On Economic Change: Landmarks Of Economic Modernism

Authors

  • Gabriela Bodea Babeş-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca
  • Aurelian-Petruș Plopeanu Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași
  • Daniel Homocianu Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași

Keywords:

economic and social change; mentality; modernism; progress

Abstract

Change consists in a noticeable transformation in time, which affects the structure or functioning of the social organization of a community, changing the course of its history. Without being allowed to induce delusions, change imposes development examples for our society, taking on the role of a modernizing agent. The purpose of the present paper is to provide an overview on the process of social modernization via economic, social, cultural and political structures of human communities and government forms, concluding with the fact that modernism is the movement that sets modernization in motion. Our conclusion is that modernism tries to “mask” decadence through innovation, but also taking into account ‘traditional’ as a reality and not disadvantage. Innovation is necessary as well in order to overcome limits of our past, but it cannot cancel traditions and neither does it have the moral rights to do so.

References

Beaud, M. (2001). A History of Capitalism. 1500-1980. Chisinau: Cartier.
Berger, P. (1992). The Uncertain Triumph of Democratic Capitalism. Journal of Democracy, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 7-16.
Boia, L. (2007). The West. A Historical Interpretation. Bucharest: Humanitas.
Boudon, R. (ed. ) (1997). Traité de Sociologie. Bucharest: Humanitas.
Boudon, R. (1984). La Place du Désordre. Paris: PUF.
Didier, M. (1994). Economy: Rules of the Game. Bucharest: Humanitas.
Friedman, M. (1995). Capitalism and freedom. Bucharest: Enciclopedica.
Fukuyama, F. (2003). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Bucharest: Antet XX.
Galbraith, J. K. (1982). Economics and the Public Purpose. Bucharest: Politica.
Graff, H. J. (1991). The Legacies of Literacy: Continuities and Contradictions in Western Culture and Society. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Groethuysen, B. (1927). Origines de l’Esprit Bourgeois en France. Paris: Gallimard.
Hayek, F. (2001). The Road to Serfdom. New York: Routledge.
Hayek, F. (2011). The Constitution of Liberty: The Definitive Edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Mill, J. S. (1993). On the Definition and Method of Political Economy. D. M. Hausman (ed. ). The Philosophy of Economics. An Anthology. Bucharest: Humanitas.
Little, I. M. D. (2002). A Critique of Welfare Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Locke, J. (1980). Second Treatise of Government. C. B. Macpherson (ed. ). Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
Marx, K. (1954). A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Bucharest: State Publishing House for Political Literature.
National Intelligence Council (2008). Global Trends 2025. A Transformed World. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.
Pirenne, H. (2006). Economic and Social History of Medieval Europe. London and New York: Routledge.
Popper, K. (1998). The Lesson of this Century. Bucharest: Nemira.
Robbins L. in Hausman, D. M. (ed. ) (1993). The Philosophy of Economics. An Anthology. Bucharest: Humanitas.
Schumpeter, J. A. in Hausman, D. M. (ed. ) (1993). The Philosophy of Economics. An Anthology. Bucharest: Humanitas.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). Capitalisme, Socialisme et Démocratie. Paris: Payot.
Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond Freedom and Dignity. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Weber, M. (2005). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Routledge.
Wilcox, C. (1970). Competition and Monopoly in American Industry. Westport: Greenwood Press.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-03

How to Cite

Bodea, G. ., Plopeanu, A.-P. ., & Homocianu, D. . (2020). On Economic Change: Landmarks Of Economic Modernism : Array. EuroEconomica, 39(2). Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/EE/article/view/298