Economic Integration and Sovereign Law at Crossroads: Poland and the EU

  • Collins Ngwakwe University of Limpopo
Keywords: Sovereign law, economic integration, EU supremacy, economic utility, economic growth, passive agreement

Abstract

The dire need for economic wellbeing may lure states into economic integration amidst a somewhat passive agreement. This paper aims to isolate the crossroad between the EU economic integration and sovereign law. The prior conceptual basis is on economic utility and passive agreement. The approach is conceptual and applies discourse analysis using the recent unprecedented Poland’s court ruling, which challenges the EU’s supremacy. The paper uncovers a central point of conflict, which is the desire to retain national legal sovereignty and the quest for higher economic utility. Therefore, the paper highlights an intractable crossroad between target economic wellbeing and regaining the supremacy of national sovereign law. This paper contributes the first utility analysis following the recent Poland’s court objection of EU’s supremacy. It is therefore a good reading for university business schools. The economic and ideological contexts of the paper provide practical insight for economic policy makers on economic integration issues. Further research may pursue the possibility that achieving envisaged higher order economic utility may assuage the desire for national sovereignty pursuit.

References

BBC (2021) Brexit: What has the European Court of Justice got to do with the NI Protocol?,https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-58889543

Buras P (2017) Europe and its discontents: Poland’s collision course with the European Union. European Council on Foreign Relations,https://ecfr.eu/publication/europe_and_its_discontents_polands_collision_course_with_the_eu_7220/

Burley, A. M., & Mattli, W. (1993). Europe before the court: A political theory of legal integration. International organization, 47(1), pp.41-76
Central European Times (2021) Polish court ruling challenges primacy of EU law.https://centraleuropeantimes.com/2021/10/polish-court-ruling-challenges-primacy-of-eu-law/
Dauti, D. H. (2021). Real Contracts in Roman Law and their Development in Positive Law with Special Emphasis on Loan Contracts (Mutuum). Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, 17(1), pp. 7 – 23

ECJ (2021) The Court of Justice Of The European Union,https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/j_6/en/
IMF (2021) World Economic Outlook Data Base,https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/SPROLLs/world-economic-outlook-databases#sort=%40imfdate%20descending

Loewenstein, G., O'Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Projection bias in predicting future utility. the Quarterly Journal of economics, 118(4), pp. 1209-1248.
Maftei, J. (2015). Sovereignty in International Law. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, 11(1), ppl.54-65.
Ringeisen-Biardeaud, J. (2017). “Let’s take back control”: Brexit and the Debate on Sovereignty. Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique. French Journal of British Studies, 22(XXII-2). https://doi.org/10.4000/rfcb.1319
Simon, H. A. (1986). Rationality in psychology and economics. Journal of Business, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2352757?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents
Smith, D. L., & Wanke, J. (1993). Completing the single European market: An analysis of the impact on the member states. American Journal of Political Science, 37(2), pp. 529-554.
The Guardian (2021) Polish court rules EU law incompatible with its constitution,https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/oct/07/polish-court-rules-that-eu-laws-incompatible-with-its-constitution
Published
2021-11-22
Section
Studies and Articles