Has the International Crimes Tribunal Bangladesh (ICT-BD) assisted to Reconcile Society?


  • Rahman Md Mustakimur The Chinese University of Hong Kong


International Criminal Justice;, International Criminal Trial; , Fair Trial Rights; , Justifications of Punishment


Following the Liberation War of 1971 between Bangladesh (formerly East Pakistan) and West Pakistan, Bangladesh, a newly formed country, enacted the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act in 1973 to prosecute and punish war criminals. However, it was not until 2009 that the Bangladeshi government revived the vision of trials, announcing its intention to establish a war crimes tribunal. By appointing judges, investigators, and prosecutors, the tribunal was finally established in 2010. Although the tribunal formed by the 1973 Act is claimed to operate independently, this article arguesthat several significant shortcomings hinder the overall judicial process of criminalizing and sentencing individuals. To do that, it examines several provisions of the 1973 Act and the tribunal’s operations in light of international standards. The paper concludes that while the Bangladeshi government’s efforts to bring the suspects to justice are praiseworthy, the domestic tribunal fell short of guaranteeing the accused’s right to a fair trial and justice for society. It further contends that instead of uniting society, the tribunal splintered it. The study continues by noting that combining a hybrid tribunal and a Truth Commission could have helped unite the community and ensured justice.


Adlestein, A. L. (1954). The Statute of Limitations in Criminal Law: Prosecution. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, pp. 630, 634.

Adlestein, A. L. (1995). Conflict of the Criminal Statute of Limitations with Lesser Offenses at Trial. William & Mary Law Review, pp. 199; 262.

Afrin, Z. (2009). The International War Crimes (Tribunal) Act, 1973 of Bangladesh. Indian Yearbook of International Law and Policy,pp. 341; 344.

Allen, F. A. (1959). Criminal justice, legal values and the rehabilitative ideal. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Political Science.

Alvarez, J. (1999). Crimes of States/Crimes of Hate: Lessons from Rwanda. International Law and International Relations Theory, pp. 365; 375.

Bagaric, M., & Morss, J. R. (2006). International sentencing law: In search of a justification and coherent framework. International Criminal Review.

Beachler, D. W. (2011). The Genocide Debate: Politicians, Academics, and Victims. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Beccaria, C. (1764). On Crimes and Punishment.

Bentham, J. E. (2009). Deterrence. In A. von Hirsch, A. Ashworth, & J. V. Roberts. Principled Sentencing: Readings on Theory and Policy. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Bergman, D. (2013). Bangladesh war crimes tribunal in the dock. Doha: Aljazeera.

Bhatnagar, Y. (1971). Bangladesh: Birth of a Nation. Delhi: Indian School Supply Depot Publication Division.

Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against Our Will: Men Women and Rape. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Cantero, J. A. (2011). After Truth: The Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Media and Race Relations in Post-Apartheid South Africa. Government and International Relations Honors Papers, p. 35.

Chaudhury, K. (1972). Genocide in Bangladesh. New Delhi: Orient Longman.

Chopra, S. (2015). The International Crimes Tribunal in Bangladesh: Silencing Fair Comment. Journal of Genocide Research, pp. 211, 213.

Clark, J. N. (2008). The Three Rs: Retributive justice, Restorative justice, and Reconciliation. Contemporary Justice Review, pp. 331; 332.

Cohen, D. (2007). Hybrid Justice in East Timor, Sierra Leone, and Cambodia: Lessons Learned and Prospects for the Future. Stanford Journal of International Law.

Cotton, M. (2000). Back with a Vengeance: The Resilience of Retribution as an Articulated Purpose of Criminal Punishment. American Criminal Law Review, p. 1313.

Dickinson, L. A. (2003). The Relationship Between Hybrid Courts and International Courts: The case of Kosovo. New England Law Review, pp. 1059-1060.

Drumbl, M. A. (2000). Punishment, Postgenocide: From Guilt to Shame to Civis in Rwanda. NYU Law Review, pp. 1221; 1283.

Drumbl, M. A. (2002). Lessons for International Criminal Justice from Rwanda. Working Paper Series, p. 227.

Drumbl, M. A. (2005). Collective Violence and Individual Punishment: The Criminality of Mass Atrocity. North-western University Law Review, pp. 539, 549.

Drumbl, M. A. (2007). Atrocity, Punishment and International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Drumbl, M. A. (2012). Reimagining Child Soldiers In International Law And Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Duff, R. A. (2001). Punishment, Communication, and Community. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

Durkheim, E. (1982). The Rules Of Sociological Method, In Steven Lukes (Edt) The Rules Of Sociological Method And Selected Texts On Sociology And Its Method. New York: The Free Press.

Feinberg, J. (1970). Doing & Deserving – Essays in the Theory of Responsibility. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Fischer, M. (2011). Transitional Justice and Reconciliation: Theory and Practice. In B. Austin, M. Fischer, & H. J. Giessmann, Advancing Conflict Transformation. The Berghof Handbook II. Leverkusen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.

Fletcher, G. P. (2007). The Grammar of Criminal Law: American, Comparative, and International: Volume One: Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Galbraith, J. (2009). The Pace of International Criminal Justice. Michigan Journal of International Law, p. 79.

Gardner, M. (2011). Reconsidering Trials in Absentia at Special Tribunal for Lebanon: An Application of the Tribunal’s Early Jurisdiction. The George Washington International Law Review, pp. 91; 99.

Garimella, S. R. (2013). The Bangladesh War Crimes Trials - Strengthening Normative Structure. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, pp. 27-28.

Garkawe, S. (2012). Have Recent Changes Designed to Benefit Victims of International Crimes Added to The Legitimacy of International Criminal Justice. In G. Boas, W. A. Schabas, & M. P. Scharf. International Criminal Justice: Legitimacy and Coherence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Golash, D. (2009). The Justification of Punishment in the International Context, in Larry May and Zachary Hoskins. International Criminal Law and Philosophy.

Greenawalt, A. K. (2014). International Criminal Law for Retributivists. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 969.

Hart, H. L. (1968). Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Henham, R. (2004). The Philosophical Foundations of International Sentencing. Journal of International Criminal Justice.

Hughes, P. M. (2001). Moral Atrocity and Political Reconciliation: A Preliminary Analysis. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 123.

Katzenstein, S. (2003). Hybrid Tribunals: Searching for Justice in East Timor. Harvard Human Rights Journal.

Klabbers, J. (2001). Just Revenge? The Deterrence Argument in International Criminal Law. Finnish Yearbook of International Law , 249.

Kremnitzer, M. (2020). An Argument for Retributivism in International Criminal Law. In F. Jessberger, & J. Geneuss, Why Punish Perpetrators of Mass Atrocities? Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

Ku, J., & Nzelibe, J. (2006). Do International Criminal Tribunals Deter or Exacerbate Humanitarian Atrocities? Washington University Law Review, 777.

LaFave, W. R., Israel, J. H., King, N. J., & Kerr, O. S. (2004). Criminal Procedure. Saint Paul: West Academic Publishing.

Laplante, L. J. (2007). On the Indivisibility of Rights: Truth Commissions, Reparations, and the Right to Development. Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal, 141;148.

Linton, S. (2010). Completing the Circle: Accountability for The Crimes of the 1971 Bangladesh War of Liberation. 21 Criminal Law Forum.

Malamud-Goti, J. (1990). Transitional Governments in the Breach: Why Punish State Criminals? Human Rights Quarterly.

Mamdani, M. (2014). Beyond Nuremberg: The Historical Significance of the Post- apartheid Transition in South Africa. Politics and Society, 61.

Mendeloff, D. (2004). Truth-Seeking, Truth-Telling, and Post conflict Peacebuilding: Curb the Enthusiasm? International Studies Review, pp. 355-357.

Murphy, C. (2010). A Moral Theory of Political Reconciliation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Murphy, J. G. (1979). Retribution, Justice, and Therapy: Essays in the Philosophy of Law. (Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Ouassini, A. & Ouassini, N. (2019). 3 Kill 3 million and the Rest Will Eat of Our Hands: Genocide, Rape, and the Bangladeshi War of Liberation. In F. Jacob, Genocide and Mass Violence in Asia: An Introductory Reader. De Gruyter Oldenbourg.

Popovic, S. (2012). Prosecution of War Crimes in Bosnian Cantonal and District Courts: The Role of The Rule of Law. In Kristjánsdóttir, E.; Nollkaemper, A. & Ryngaert, C. International Law in Domestic Courts: Rule of Law Reform in Post-Conflict States. Cambridge: Intersentia Publishing.

Raynor, P. & Robinson, G. (2009). Rehabilitation, Crime and Justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Razzaq, A. (2015). The Tribunals in Bangladesh: Falling Short of International Standards, in Kirsten Sellars. Trials for International Crimes in Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Robinson, D. (2008). The Identity Crisis of International Criminal Law. Leiden Journal of International Law.

Salim, A. (1971). Bangladesh: Literary Responses to the Tragedy of 1971. In Khattak, A. G. & Salim, A. The Land of Two Partitions and Beyond, p. 166.

Sander, B. (2019). Justifying International Criminal Punishment: A Critical Perspective. In M. Bergsmo, & E. J. Buis, Philosophical Foundations of International Criminal Law: Foundational Concepts. Brussels: Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher.

Schabas, W. (1997). Sentencing by International Tribunals: A Human Rights Approach. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, pp. 461–517; 502.

Schabas, W. (2012). Unimaginable Atrocities: Justice, Politics and Rights at the War Crimes Tribunals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sloane, R. D. (2007). The Expressive Capacity of International Punishment: The Limits of The National Law Analogy And The Potential of International Criminal Law. Stanford Journal of International Law, pp. 77-78.

Stahn, C. (2020). Remedial Expression: Expressive Punishment and Repair of Harm. In C. Stahn, Justice as Message: Expressivist Foundations of International Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Staub, E. (2006). Reconciliation After Genocide, Mass Killing, or Intractable Conflict: Understanding the Roots of Violence, Psychological Recovery and Steps Toward a General Theory. International Society of Political Psychology, pp. 867; 873.

Teitel, R. (2005). The Law and Politics of Contemporary Transitional Justice. Cornell Int. Law Journal.

Wilson, R. A. (2005). Judging History: The Historical Record of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Human Rights Quarterly.

Zalta, E. N. (2015). Uri Nodelman & Colin Allen, Reconciliation. The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy.

Zvobgo, K. (2020). Demanding Truth: The Global Transitional Justice Network and the Creation of Truth Commissions. International Studies Quarterly, pp. 609; 611.




How to Cite

Md Mustakimur, R. (2023). Has the International Crimes Tribunal Bangladesh (ICT-BD) assisted to Reconcile Society?. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, 19(2), 115–149. Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDJ/article/view/2379



Studies and Articles