The Settlement of Management Rights Dispute or Utilization of Legal Certainty on the “Surat Ijo” Land Status
Abstract
The land is one of the natural resources essential for human life. However, the land area is decreasing and limited because of the high population, natural conditions, and land area ownership. In Surabaya, land with Surat Ijo (green certificate) status has caused controversy between the government and Land Use Permits (IPT) holders. This study discusses the management and utilization of Surat Ijo land in Surabaya. This study uses normative legal methods with descriptive analysis. The data collection technique used in this study was a literature study. The results show that the concepts of land and management rights have been recognized by law in Indonesia. Surat Ijo or land use permits (IPT) holders only have management rights over the land they occupy but not the rights over the land. They can involve a third party to use the land, but the right still belongs to the Surabaya Government. Thus, it can be concluded that land with Surat Ijo status belongs to the Surabaya government, which residents with official IPT manage.
References
Andari, C. P., & Purwoatmodjo, D. (2019). Akibat Hukum Asas Pemisahan Horizontal dalam Peralihan Hak atas Tanah. Notarius, 12(2), 703–717.
Atikah, N. (2022). Kedudukan Surat Keterangan Tanah sebagai Bukti Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah dalam Sistem Hukum Pertanahan Indonesia. Notary Law Journal, 1(3), 263–289.
Bakker, L. (2008). Can We Get Hak Ulayat? Land and Community in Pasir and Nunukan, East Kalimantan. Conference: Indira Workshop.
David, D. (2021). Keberadaan Surat Ijo dikaji berdasarkan Pendekatan Kasus dan Teori Tujuan Hukum Gustav Radbruch. Jurnal Education and Development, 9(4), 478–484.
Hariri, A., Prakasa, S. U. W., Arifin, S., Efendi, A. B., & Asis, A. (2022). Corporate vs Community Head to Head: The Complexity of Land Tenure Conflict in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services, 4(1), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v4i1.55648
Kurniawan, M. N. (2012). Kasus Pertahanan diatas Surat Hijau di Kota Surabaya Provinsi Jawa Timur. Sekolah Tinggi Pertahanan Nasional Yogyakarta.
Kusumadara, A. (2013). Perkembangan Hak Negara atas Tanah: Hak Menguasai atau Hak Memiliki? Jurnal Media Hukum, 20(2), 262–276. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v20i2.267
Margareta, S., & Huda, M. (2023). The Legal Footing of Petok D as the Evidence of Land Ownership and Rights. Ius Positum: Journal of Law Theory and Enforcement, 2(2), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.56943/jlte.v2i2.284
Nola, L. F. (2013). Sengketa Tanah Partikelir. Negara Hukum, 4(2), 183–196.
Santoso, U. (2010). Pengelolaan Tanah Aset Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. Majalah Yuridika, 25(1).
Santoso, U. (2012). Eksistensi Hak Pengelolaan dalam Hukum Tanah Nasional. Mimbar Hukum, 24(2), 187–375.
Santoso, U. (2013). Kewenangan Pemerintah Daerah dalam Penguasaan atas Tanah. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 13(1), 99–108.
Sari, I. (2017). Hak-Hak atas Tanah dalam Sistem Hukum Pertahanan di Indonesia menurut Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria (UUPA). Jurnal Mitra Manajemen, 9(1), 15–33.
Savitri, A. R., & Sujatmoko, E. (2020). Pencabutan Izin Pemakaian Tanah (IPT) untuk Kepentingan Umum oleh Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. Universitas Airlangga.
Sidiq, A. (2023). Building Use Rights over Land Management Rights in Shopping Centers. Communale Journal, 1(1), 23–35.
Sukaryanto. (2013). Konflik Tanah Surat Ijo di Surabaya (Sebuah Perspektif Teoretik-Resolutif). Bhumi, 2(2), 165–178.
Zainuddin, & Ulya, Z. (2018). Domein Verklaring dalam Pendayagunaan Tanah di Aceh. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 13(1), 139–152.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Karim, Jamil, Lolita Permanasari, Edi Wahyuningati, Siti Ngaisah, Sinarianda Kurnia Hartantien
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The author fully assumes the content originality and the holograph signature makes him responsible in case of trial.
