The Crown Witnesses Objectivity in Evidence System of Indonesian Criminal Law

Authors

  • Yahman Bhayangkara University of Surabaya
  • Dossy Iskandar Prasetyo Bhayangkara University of Surabaya
  • Ina Rosmaya Bhayangkara University of Surabaya
  • Ahmad Hidayat Bhayangkara University of Surabaya
  • Kunarso Bhayangkara University of Surabaya
  • Azizul Hakiki Bhayangkara University of Surabaya

Keywords:

Criminal Procedure Code, Evidentiary System, Supreme Court Decision of Republic Indonesia, Witness

Abstract

In criminal case, defendants who jointly commit a criminal act can be used as witnesses between one another, called crown witnesses. The function of witnesses in every criminal case is very crucial since their statement are able to determine the judge's decision, which every witness statement always has great attention both by the legal actors involved in the trial and by legal observers. This research is normative juridical research through a statutory case approach to find out whether the presence of a crown witness is not contrary to the objectives of the law and how the legal protection of crown witnesses in corruption crimes.

References

Alfitra. (2011). Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Beracara Pidana, Perdata dan Korupsi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Asser. Retrieved from https://simpus.mkri.id/opac/detail-opac?id=1129

Andi Hamzah. (2008a). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia (2nd ed.). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. Retrieved from https://simpus.mkri.id/opac/detail-opac?id=8988

Andi Hamzah. (2008b). KUHP & KUHAP (Edisi Revi). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

DosenSosiologi.Com. (2023). Pengertian Objektif, Ciri, dan Contohnya.

Fakhruddin. (2017). Memahami Objektivitas Dalam Penilaian Moral. Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 3(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15408/ushuluna.v3i1.15186

Fuady, M. (2006). Teori Hukum Pembuktian (Pidana dan Perdata) (1st ed.). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti. Retrieved from https://simpus.mkri.id/opac/detail-opac?id=5116

Hamzah, A., & Dahlan, I. (1985). Perbandingan KUHAP, HIR, dan Komentar (2nd ed.). Jakarta: Yudistira. Retrieved from https://perpustakaan.mahkamahagung.go.id/slims/pusat/index.php?p=show_detail&id=3075

Kurnia, A. J. (2019). Definisi Saksi Mahkota. Retrieved February 13, 2023, from hukumonline.com website: http://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/lt4fbae50accb01/definisi=saksi-mahkota

Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Pengayoman. (2020). Pengertian Terlapor, Tersangka, Terdakwa, dan Terpidana. Retrieved July 1, 2023, from https://lbhpengayoman.unpar.ac.id/ website: https://lbhpengayoman.unpar.ac.id/pengertian-terlapor-tersangka-terdakwa-dan-terpidana/

Lilik Mulyadi. (2012). Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana: Perspektif, Teoretis, dan Praktik (2nd ed.). Bandung: Alumni. Retrieved from https://simpus.mkri.id/opac/detail-opac?id=10220

Permatasari, E. (2022). Hak-hak Tersangka, Terdakwa, dan Terpidana. Retrieved July 1, 2023, from https://www.hukumonline.com/ website: https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/hak-hak-tersangka-terdakwa-dan-terpidana-cl4236/

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Sisi-sisi Lain dari Hukum di Indonesia (3rd ed.). Jakarta: Kompas.

Rozi, F. (2018). Sistem Pembuktian Dalam Proses Persidangan Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Yuridis Unaja, 1(2), 19–33. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/286645-sistem-pembuktian-dalam-proses-persidang-c81b9beb.pdf

Tesis, I. (2013). Metode Penelitian Hukum Empiris dan Normatif. Retrieved November 14, 2021, from https://idtesis.com/metode-penelitian-hukum-empiris-dan-normatif/

Tim Hukumonline. (2022). Jenis-Jenis Saksi dari Memberatkan hingga Meringankan. Retrieved July 1, 2023, from https://www.hukumonline.com/ website: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/jenis-jenis-saksi-lt629444af59b56/

Tindak Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga. (2008). Retrieved January 22, 2023, from bunghatta.ac.id website: https://bunghatta.ac.id/artikel-226-tindak-kekerasan-dalam-rumah-tangga.html

Willa Wahyuni. (2022). Saksi Mahkota Sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Perkara Pidana. Retrieved February 13, 2023, from hukumonline.com website: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/saksi-mahkota-sebagai-alat-bukti-dalam-perkara-pidana-lt6357a94bc08cc

Downloads

Published

2023-09-27

How to Cite

Yahman, Prasetyo, D. I. ., Rosmaya, I. ., Hidayat, A. ., Kunarso, & Hakiki, A. . (2023). The Crown Witnesses Objectivity in Evidence System of Indonesian Criminal Law. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, 19(2), 176–187. Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDJ/article/view/2392

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 2 (2023)

Section

Studies and Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Yahman, Dossy Iskandar Prasetyo, Ina Rosmaya, Ahmad Hidayat, Kunarso, Azizul Hakiki

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The author fully assumes the content originality and the holograph signature makes him responsible in case of trial.