Overview of the Role of Selected Consumer Protection Bodies in the Regulation of Prices and Access to Redress Under the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008

Authors

  • Howard Chitimira North-West University
  • Phemelo Magau University of Pretoria

Keywords:

consumer protection; prices; consumer rights; regulatory bodies; vulnerable consumers

Abstract

The Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (CPA) seeks to promote the achievement and maintenance of a fair, accessible, efficient, sustainable and responsible market place for consumer products and services in South Africa. Moreover, the CPA seeks to provide an accessible, consistent, harmonised, effective and efficient system of redress for consumers. Notably, the CPA provides that the supplier should not supply or enter into an agreement to supply any goods or services at a price that is unfair, unreasonable, or unjust. This is generally aimed at combating any problems that are suffered by consumers when accessing goods and services in South Africa. Accordingly, various regulatory bodies and related role-players were established to enforce consumer rights and provide redress mechanisms to vulnerable and affected consumers. These consumer protection bodies and related role-players include the National Consumer Commission (NCC), the National Consumer Tribunal (NCT), provincial consumer courts, ordinary courts and other alternative dispute resolution agencies. These bodies and role-players are statutorily obliged to resolve consumer disputes in South Africa. However, there are some uncertainty challenges regarding the jurisdiction of ordinary courts and consumer protection regulatory bodies in relation to disputes that relate to the consumers’ right to fair, just and reasonable prices, terms and conditions of goods and services. This article discusses the role of the NCC, the NCT, provincial consumer courts, ordinary courts and other alternative dispute resolution agencies in the regulation of prices for goods, services and access to redress for affected consumers under the CPA. This is done to provide some recommendations that could resolve jurisdictional and regulatory challenges in relation to the price and access to goods and services under the CPA.

Author Biography

Howard Chitimira, North-West University

Associate Professor, Faculty of Law

References

Abrahams, R. (2017). Financial Inclusion in South Africa: A Review of the Literature. Southern African Accounting Association Biennial International Conference Proceedings, pp. 632-661.

Barnard, J. & Mišćenić, E. (2019). The Role of the Courts in the Application of Consumer Protection Law: A Comparative Perspective. Journal for Juridical Science, 44(1), pp. 111-138.

Barnard, J. (2013). Unfairness of Price and the Doctrine of Laesio Enormis in Consumer Sales. THRHR, 76, pp. 521-536.

Boshoff, W. H. (2021). South African Competition Policy on Excessive Pricing and its Relation to Price Gouging During the COVID‐19 Disaster Period. South African Journal of Economics, 89(1), pp. 112-140.

Chitimira, H. & Magau, P. (2022). A Legal Conspectus of Some Role-Players in the Development of Financial Education in South Africa. EIRP Proceedings, 17(1), pp. 360-375.

Chitimira, H. & Magau, P. (2023). The Role of Selected Regulatory Bodies in the Promotion of Financial Education in South Africa. Acta Universitatis Danubius Juridica, 19(1), pp. 28-47.

Chitimira, H. & Magau, P.T. (2021). A Legal Analysis of the Use of Innovative Technology in the Promotion of Financial Inclusion for Low-Income Earners in South Africa. PER, 24(1), pp. 1-27.

Chitimira, H. & Ncube, M. (2020). Legislative and Other Selected Challenges Affecting Financial Inclusion for the Poor and Low-Income Earners in South Africa. Journal of African Law, 64(3), pp. 337-355.

Chitimira, H. & Ncube, M. (2020). The Role of Regulatory Bodies and Other Role-Players in the Promotion of Financial Inclusion in South Africa. Acta Universitatis Danubius Juridica, 16(1), pp. 7-20.

Chitimira, H. & Ncube, M. (2021). Overview Legislative Flaws Hampering the Promotion of Financial Inclusion for the Poor and Low-Income Earners in South Africa. Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics and Business Law, 10(1), pp. 67-87.

Chitimira, H. (2020). Historical Aspects of the Statutory Regulation of Financial Inclusion for the Poor and Low-Income Earners in South Africa. Acta Universitatis Danubius Economica. 16(5), pp. 269-284.

Cooter, R. & Ulen, T. (2016). Law & Economics. 6th edition. Boston: Addison-Wesley/Pearson Education Inc.

Cseres, K.J. (2005). Competition Law and Consumer Protection. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.

De, R.; Pandey, N. & Pal, A. (2020). Impact of Digital Surge During Covid-19 Pandemic: A Viewpoint on Research and Practice. International Journal of Information Management, 55, pp. 1-5.

Dellal, N.A. & Koch, S. (2019). Contemporary Educational Researches: Theory and Practice in Education. Norderstedt, Germany: Books on Demand.

Greenbaum, L. (2020). Access to Justice for All: A Reality or Unfulfilled Expectations?. De Jure Law Journal, 53(1), pp. 248-266.

Gwartney, J.D.; Stroup, R.L.; Sobel, R.S.; & Macpherson, D.A. (2020). Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice. 17th edition. Boston: Cengage Learning.

Hamadziripi, F. & Chitimira, H. (2021). The Socio-Economic Effects of the COVID-19 National Lockdown on South Africa and its Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Acta Universitatis Danubius Juridica, 17(1), pp. 24-42.

Heywood, M. & Hassim, A. (2008). Remedying the Maladies of ‘Lesser Men or Women’: The Personal, Political and Constitutional Imperatives for Improved Access to Justice. SAJHR, 24(2), pp. 263-280.

Lake, R. (2011). The Consumer’s Right to Redress - Is National Consumer Commission Fulfilling its Mandate?. De Rebus 46.

Magaqa, M. (2015). The NCC and the NCT Walk the Long Road to Consumer Protection. South African Mercantile Law Journal, 27(1). pp. 32-57.

Melville, N. (2010). Has Ombudsmania Reached South Africa? The Burgeoning Role of Ombudsmen in Commercial Dispute Resolution. SA Merc LJ, 22(1), pp. 50-65.

Mercuro, N. & Medema, S.G. (2006). Economics and the Law: From Posner to Postmodernism and Beyond. 2nd edition. Chicago: Princeton University Press.

Mupangavanhu, Y. (2012). An Analysis of the Dispute Settlement Mechanism Under the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008. 15(5). PELJ, pp. 320-346.

National Consumer Tribunal (2019). Annual Report 2018/19. Available at https://www.thenct.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/NCT-Annual-report-2018-19.pdf accessed on 17 January 2024

Naudé, T. (2009). The Consumer’s ‘Right to Fair, Reasonable and Just Terms’ Under the New Consumer Protection Act in Comparative Perspective. SALJ, 127(3), pp. 505-536.

Oxenham, J.; Currie, M. & van der Merwe, C. (2020). COVID-19 Price Gouging Cases in South Africa: Short-Term Market Dynamics with Long-Term Implications for Excessive Pricing Cases. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 11(9), pp. 524–530.

Rautenbach, C. (2022). Introduction to Legal Pluralism in South Africa. 6th edition. Durban: LexisNexis.

Sharrock, R. (2016). The Law of Banking and Payment in South Africa. Cape Town: Juta & Company (Pty) Ltd.

van Eeden, E. & Barnard, J. (2017). Consumer Protection Law in South Africa. 2nd edition. Durban: LexisNexis.

Van Heerden, C. & Barnard, J. (2011) Redress for Consumers in terms of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008: A Comparative Discussion. JICIT, 6(3), pp. 131-144.

Viscusi, W.K.; Harrington, J.E.J. & Sappington, D.E.M. (2018). Economics of Regulation and Antitrust. 5th edition. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Woker, T. (2010). Why the Need for Consumer Protection Legislation? A Look at Some of the Reasons Behind the Promulgation of the National Credit Act and the Consumer Protection Act. Obiter, 31(2), pp. 217-231.

Woker, T. (2011). A Critical Examination of the Role that the National Consumer Tribunal Plays in Debt Relief with Suggestions for Reform. Available at https://www.up.ac.za/media/shared/Legacy/sitefiles/file/47/327/lawclinicdraftpapersfromconference/tanyawokerdraft.pdf accessed on 31 January 2024.

Woker, T. (2016). Consumer Protection and Alternative Dispute Resolution. South African Mercantile Law Journal, 28(1), pp. 21-48.

Woker, T. (2017). Evaluating the Role of the National Consumer Commission in Ensuring that Consumers Have Access to Redress. South African Mercantile Law Journal, 29(1). pp. 1-16.

Woker, T. (2019). Consumer Protection: An Overview Since 1994. Stell LR, 30(1), pp. 97-115.

Case Law

Afrox Healthcare; Price Waterhouse Coopers Inc v National Potato Co-Operative Ltd 2004 6 SA 66 (SCA).

Auction Alliance v The National Consumer Commission and Others WCC No 7798/2012.

Babelegi Workwear and Industrial Supplies CC v Competition Commission of South Africa (186/CAC/JUN20) [2020] ZACAC 7.

Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 5 SA 323 (CC).

Botha (now Griessel) v Finanscredit (Pty) Ltd 1989 3 SA 773 (A).

Breedenkamp v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd 2009 5 SA 304 (GSJ), 2009 6 SA 277 (GSJ), 2010 4 SA 468 (SCA).

Brisley v Drotsky 2002 4 SA 1 (SCA).

Byleveld v Execor Twelve (Pty) Ltd t/a Motor City and Another [2014] ZANCT 2.

Clientele General Insurance Ltd v National Consumer Commission (NCT/4671/2012/60(3) & 101(1) (P)) [2013] ZANCT 7.

Clur v Keil 2012 (3) SA 50 (ECG).

Competition Commission of South Africa v Distillers Corporation (SA) Ltd [2003] ZACAC 10.

Free Market Foundation v Minister of Labour and Others [2016] 3 All SA 99 (GP).

Mobile Telephone Networks (Pty) Ltd v The National Consumer Commission NCT/2738/2011/101(1) (P) [2012] ZANCT 20.

Murray NO and Others v National Consumer Commission and Others, Auction Alliance (Pty) Ltd v National Consumer Commision and Others (NCT/4454/2012/101(1)(P)CPA, NCT/4570/2012/101(1)(P)CPA) [2012] ZANCT 17

Murray, Cloete et al v The National Consumer Commission et al NCT/4454/2012/101 (1) (P) CPA.

National Consumer Commission v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (NCT/205517/2021/73(2)(b)) [2022] ZANCT 13.

National Credit Regulator v Chatspare Pty Ltd (NCT/16/2008/138(1)(P) [2008] ZANCT 1.

NCC v Belegi Workwear and Industrial Supplies (Pty) Ltd NCT/160912/2020/73(2).

Nunes v Crawford and Others [2010] 4 All SA 304 (WCC).

South African Forestry Co Ltd v York Timbers Ltd 2005 3 SA 323 (SCA).

Vodacom Service Provider Company v National Consumer Commission (NCT/2793/2011/101 (1)(P) [2012] ZANCT 9.

Wingfield Motors (Pty) Ltd v National Consumer Commission (NCT/3882/2012/101(1)(P) CPA) [2013] ZANCT 11.

Woodlands Dairy (Pty) Ltd and Another v Competition Commission; Competition Commission v Clover Industries Ltd and Others [2009] ZACT 18.

Legislation

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996.

Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008.

Electronic Communications Act 36 of 2005.

National Credit Act 34 of 2005.

Promotion of Access to Justice Act 3 of 2000.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-09

How to Cite

Chitimira, H., & Magau, P. . (2024). Overview of the Role of Selected Consumer Protection Bodies in the Regulation of Prices and Access to Redress Under the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, 20(1), 43–59. Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDJ/article/view/2678

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>