Kids at the Crossroads: The Influence of International Law on Child Psychology
Keywords:
Global Child Welfare; International Law and Child Mental Health; Legal Impact on Child Psychology; Children’s Rights and Mental Health; Cross-border Child ProtectionAbstract
This research explores the intersection of international law and child psychology, emphasizing how legal frameworks shape the mental health and well-being of children across diverse cultural contexts. The Court has established that private life comprises physical and psychological elements and relates to a person’s identity. Focusing on key instruments such as the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, the study examines the implications of these laws for psychological practices and policies affecting children’s rights and welfare. Through a review of case studies and existing literature, we highlight the positive impacts of international legal standards on child mental health interventions, as well as the challenges faced in their implementation. By analyzing the role of cultural variations and local practices, the research underscores the necessity for collaboration between legal and psychological professionals to advocate for effective, child-centered approaches. Ultimately, this study aims to illuminate the critical role of international law in shaping a more supportive environment for children’s psychological development, suggesting pathways for future research and policy improvements.
References
Allan, A. (2015). Law and ethics in psychology: An international perspective. Ethics & Behaviour, 25(6), 443-457.
Cherry, K. (2023, March 13). 7 Developmental Theories: Child development theories of Freud, Erickson, and more. Verywell Mind. Retrieved from https://www.verywellmind.com/child-development-theories-2795068.
Cherry, K. (2024, July 15). How social learning theory works. Verywell Mind. Retrieved from https://www.verywellmind.com/social-learning-theory-2795074.
Commission of the European Communities. (2006). Communication from The Commission Towards an EU Strategy on the Rights of the Child. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2006:0367:FIN:en:PDF.
Detrick, S. (2023). The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: A guide to the “Travaux Préparatoires”. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=FMj7EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&ots=U2g5Do3YZL&sig=lSpym0bkuYrIpPdpc1EPy1ifiXo.
Deva, S. (2024, September 18). Decisive action required to realise right to development of children and future generations: UN expert. United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/09/decisive-action-required-realise-right-development-children-and-future.
European Commission. (2021). Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values Programme (CERV). EU Funding & Tenders Portal. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/programmes/cerv.
European Commission. (2021). Uricchio v. Italy and 31 other States (Case No. 14615/21) and De Conto v. Italy and 32 other States (Case No. 14620/21). EU Funding & Tenders Portal. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=003-7566368-10398533&filename=Status%20of%20climate%20applications%20before%20the%20European%20Court.pdf.
European Court of Human Rights. (2021). Uricchio v. Italy and 32 other States, Case No. 14615/21. Retrieved from https://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/uricchio-v-italy-and-32-other-states/.
Federal Court of Australia. (2023). Save the Children Australia v Minister for Home Affairs [2023] FCA 1343. Retrieved from https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2023/2023fca1343.
Garagounis, B. (2023). Magistrate failed to consider minor's right to privacy under the Victorian Charter. MB (a pseudonym) v Children’s Court of Victoria & Anor [2023] VSC 666. Human Rights Law Center. Retrieved from https://www.hrlc.org.au/human-rights-case-summaries/2023/12/12/childrens-court-victoria-charter.
Hamill, C. (2021, March 19). Keeping children out of custody wherever possible – the Supreme Court of Victoria overturns decision to refuse bail to 15-year-old child. Human Rights Law Centre. https://www.hrlc.org.au/human-rights-case-summaries/2021/3/19/keeping-children-out-of-custody-wherever-possible-the-supreme-court-of-victoria-overturns-decision-to-refuse-bail-to-15-year-old-child.
Humanium. (2024). Geneva Declaration on Child Rights, 1924. Retrieved from https://www.humanium.org/en/geneva-declaration/#:~:text=On%2026%20September%201924%2C%20the,rights%20for%20children%20were%20recognised.
International Criminal Court. (2021). The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen ICC-02/04-01/15. Retrieved from https://www.icc-cpi.int/uganda/ongwen.
Kecskés, G., & Lux, Á. (2023). There is no plan(et) B - environmental “crossroads” of children’s rights. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 64(1), 4-31.
Kwok, V. & Msehli, S. (2024, September 19). UN Child Rights Committee publishes findings on Argentina, Armenia, Bahrain, Israel, Mexico, and Turkmenistan. United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/09/un-child-rights-committee-publishes-findings-argentina-armenia-bahrain.
Lux, A., & Kaya, R. (2023). Editorial: Challenges of children’s rights. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 64(1), 1-3.
O’Mahony, C. (2019). Constitutional Protection of children’s rights: visibility, agency and enforceability. Human Rights Law Review, 19(3), 401-434.
Orthey, R., Rechdan, J., Satchell, L. P., Kyo, A., Matsuda, I., & Walsh, D. (2024). Applications of legal psychology in Japan: Current practice, research knowledge, and future directions. Collabra: Psychology, 10(1).
Schrama, W. M., Freeman, M., Law, F., Taylor, N. J., & Bruning, M. R. (Eds.). (2021). International handbook on child participation in family law. Cambridge: Intersentia. Retrieved from https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/download/ea27d1b6fc01ae5757223f9d9c6f4fc2a61d57e321810125a879c2cf4c57c8c4/1008354/England%20and%20Wales.pdf.
Siffrein-Blanc, C., Moreau, T., Paré, M., & Bruning, M. (2022). Children’s access to justice. A critical Assessment. Intersentia.
UNICEF. (2021). History of child rights. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention/history-child-rights.
UNICEF. (2024). History of child rights: International standards have advanced dramatically over the past century – explore the milestones. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention/history-child-rights.
UNICEF. (2024). The Convention on the Rights of the Child: The children’s version. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention/convention-text-childrens-version.
United Nations General Assembly. (1989, November 20). Convention on the Rights of the Child. General Assembly resolution 44/25. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child.
United Nations General Assembly. (2002). A world fit for children: resolution / adopted by the General Assembly. United Nations Digital Library. Retrieved from https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/464538?v=pdf.
United Nations Information Service. (2024, September 13). Committee on the Rights of the Child Closes Ninety-Seventh Session after Adopting Concluding Observations on Argentina, Armenia, Bahrain, Israel, Mexico and Turkmenistan. United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/news/2024/09/committee-rights-child-closes-ninety-seventh-session-after-adopting-concluding.
United Nations. (2024). The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/goals.
United Nations. (2024). UNICEF. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/ccoi/unicef-united-nations-childrens-fund.
Van Bueren, G. (2021). The international law on the rights of the child, Vol. 35. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=cs8VEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&ots=50gpPbSNKx&sig=1x-aH4UKsPO3tunkr77Y3Wp3I7I.
Veselov, M. (2020). Administrative and legal ensure of “the best interests of the child” in the field of junior justice. Public Administration and Law Review, 3, 49-56.
Williams, A. (2024). Duarte Agostinho v Portugal – Strasbourg Gives Judgment in Landmark Climate Change Case, App. No. 39371/20. Cornerstone Barristers. Retrieved from https://cornerstonebarristers.com/duarte-agostinho-v-portugal-strasbourg-gives-judgment-in-landmark-climate-change-case/.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Junaid Butt

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The author fully assumes the content originality and the holograph signature makes him responsible in case of trial.