A Comparative Performance Evaluation of Islamic and Conventional Funds in South Africa
The study comparatively evaluated the performance of Islamic and Conventional funds that comprised of South African unit trusts listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) vis-à-vis selected market benchmark indices. Whilst the study utilised descriptive statistical analysis for the non-risk adjusted performance analysis, several investment performance models were used for the risk adjusted performance analysis. Relevant statistical tests were performed to decipher relationships between the Islamic fund and the Conventional fund vis-à-vis the selected market benchmarks. Based on the non-risk adjusted performance analysis and absolute risk adjusted performance analysis, the empirical evidence suggests that the Conventional fund performed better than the Islamic fund. However, the relative risk adjusted performance analysis shows a mixed overall result during the entire period of the study. While the Modigliani & Modigliani measure and Jensen alpha showed that the Conventional fund performed better than the Islamic fund from a risk adjusted return perspective, the Treynor ratio showed that the Islamic fund performed better than the Conventional fund. More so, while the t-test analysis suggests that there is no statistically significant evidence to support that the Islamic fund under or outperforms the Conventional fund, the correlation analysis showed that both funds are more positively correlated and statistically significant with the South African market indices. The findings of the study imply that an investment in the Conventional fund would have offered a superlative non-risk adjusted return than the Islamic fund. Also, the relative risk adjusted performance imply that upon the diversification of unsystematic risks in some market indices, the Islamic fund may perform better than the Conventional fund.
Agussalim M, Limakrisna N and Ali H (2017) Mutual Funds Performance: Conventional and Sharia Product. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 7(4).
Ahmad S and Alsharif D (2019) A Comparative Performance Evaluation of Islamic and Conventional Mutual Funds in Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed SF and Soomro RH (2017) Analyzing Performance of Islamic and Conventional Funds Listed In Karachi Stock. KASBIT Business Journals (KBJ) 10(Special Issue): 6-30.
Alam M and Ansari VA (2020) Are Islamic indices a viable investment avenue? An empirical study of Islamic and conventional indices in India. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management.
Alwi S, Ahmad R, Hashim IZA, et al. (2019) Investigating the Islamic and conventional mutual fund performance: Evidence from Malaysia equity market. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing 15(7): 371-384.
Anwar SR and Arif TMH (2017) Evaluation of mutual funds performance in Bangladesh: Investors and market perspective. Global Journal of Management and Business Research.
Arif M, Samim MM, Khurshid MK, et al. (2019) Islamic Versus Conventional Mutual Funds Performance in Pakistan; Comparative Analysis Through Performance Measures and DEA Approach. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences 8(1): pp. 76-94.
Aziz JA (2018) Islamic Banking in Global Economic Context (Critical Studies of Operational System and Performance of Islamic Banking). Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial 12(2): 343-361.
Aziz RA, Hassan R, Salman SA, et al. (2019) The Public Perception on Knowledge of Islamic Unit Trust in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Social Science 10(5).
Badr MA (2016) Factors Affecting the Financial Performance of Investment Funds a Comparative Study: Islamic versus Conventional Funds. Available at SSRN 2953925.
Banani A and Hidayatun NA (2017) Performance of Islamic indices: Risk adjusted returns of Sharia compliant stocks on Jakarta Islamic Index and Dow Jones Islamic Turkey. Journal Economics & Business Atmajaya Indonesia 1(1): 1-18.
Ben-David I, Franzoni F and Moussawi R (2017) Exchange-traded funds. Annual Review of Financial Economics 9: 169-189.
Billah MMS (2019) Islamic Unit Trust (Micro-Saving). Islamic Financial Products. Springer, pp.369-377.
Bodie Z, Kane A and Marcus AJ (2019) Essentials of investments. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Taipei.
Chandra P (2017) Investment analysis and portfolio management. McGraw-hill education.
Gil-Bazo J, Hoffmann P and Mayordomo S (2019) Mutual funding. Available at SSRN 2541458.
Hasan AN, Abdul-Rahman A and Yazid Z (2020) Shariah governance practices at Islamic fund management companies. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research.
Kholvadia F (2017) Islamic banking in South Africa–form over substance? Meditari Accountancy Research.
Merdad H, Hassan MK and Alhenawi Y (2010) Islamic versus conventional mutual funds performance in Saudi Arabia: a case study. Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics 362(3061): 1-75.
Mishi S and Chipote P (2014) Impact of financial literacy in optimising financial inclusion in rural South Africa: Case study of the Eastern Cape Province. Accessed.
Nofsinger JR (2017) The psychology of investing. Routledge.
Omri A, Soussou K and Ben Sedrine Goucha N (2019) On the post-financial crisis performance of Islamic mutual funds: the case of Riyad funds. Applied Economics 51(18): 1929-1946.
Patel Y (2018) The Performance of Shariah Compliant Investment Funds in South Africa. University of Johannesburg.
Reddy K, Mirza N, Naqvi B, et al. (2017) Comparative risk adjusted performance of Islamic, socially responsible and conventional funds: Evidence from United Kingdom. Economic Modelling 66: 233-243.
Shaikh SA, Ismail MA, Ismail AG, et al. (2019) Comparative analysis of Shari’ah-compliant portfolios: evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research.
Trabelsi L, Bahloul S and Mathlouthi F (2020) Performance analysis of Islamic and conventional portfolios: The emerging markets case. Borsa Istanbul Review 20(1): 48-54.
Yusuff N, Mansor F and Hamed AB (2017) The Measurement Of Islamic Unit Trust Investment Decision In Malaysia: An Exploratory Factor Analysis. IJIB 2(1): 38-45.
The author fully assumes the content originality and the holograph signature makes him responsible in case of trial.