Product Characteristics, Location and Competitive Advantage: Evidence from Electronic Gadget Outlets

Authors

  • Azeez Tunbosun Lawal Al-Hikmah University
  • Abdulrasheed Jimoh Al-Hikmah University
  • Amudat Bolatito Brimah Al-Hikmah University
  • Dana Lewis-Ambrose Unicaf University in Malawi
  • Dare Ismail Kwara State Polytechnic
  • Wasiu Omotayo Bakare Federal University

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between product characteristics (quality and price), location and competitive advantage of electronic gadget outlets within Ilorin metropolis of Kwara State. This study is hinged onResource-based View Theory, with the intentionto identify and leverage the unique resources of electronic gadget outlets to gain a sustainable competitive advantage. A  survey  research design  was  employed, employing  a  purposive  sampling technique  of  364customers of selected electronic gadget outlets within Ilorin metropolis of Kwara State. Data were collected using the Instrument titled “Product Characteristics, Location and Competitive Advantage Questionnaire (PCLACAQ)”.Both Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) and Partial Least Square (PLS-SEM) software were used to analyze the data collected. The results indicated that location correlates with the attainment of organizational competitiveness of gadget outlets. According to the study, quality is a good indicator of competitive advantage of gadgets outlets; this indicates that quality produce competitive advantage to the organization. Results from this study shows that quality and location is a good indication of the performance of electronics stores. This suggests that quality and location results in a competitive advantage for the company, while price does not contributes to enhanced organisational performance. The current research however illustrates that improving an organization's quality and location improve both its performance and its advantage over its competitors. There are some implications in this study for managers in the electronic gadget outlets. Management must ensure the quality assurance of the electronic gadget products is not compromised; this would further boost the corporate image of their business for expected productivity and longevity. Researchers and industry professionals can gain valuable insights into the strategies and factors that drive success in this particular market segment by investigating the relationship between location, product characteristics (price and quality), and competitive advantage of electronic gadget outlets. This study contributes to the existing knowledge base, provides guidance to retailers, and supports decision-making processes in the ever-changing landscape of electronic gadget retail.

Author Biographies

Azeez Tunbosun Lawal, Al-Hikmah University

PhD, Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Management Sciences

Wasiu Omotayo Bakare, Federal University

PhD Student

References

Abd Aziz, N. N. & Samad, S. (2016). Innovation and competitive advantage: Moderating effects of firm age in foods manufacturing SMEs in Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, pp. 256-266.

Abubakar, I. & Mohammad, H. I. (2019). Linking Product Line Strategies to Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study of Nigerian Food and Beverages Industry. SEISENSE Journal of Management, 2(4), pp. 65-78.

Alghamdi, H. & Bach, C. (2013). Quality as competitive advantage. International Journal of Management & Information Technology, 8(1), pp. 1265-1272.

Aminu, I. M. & Shariff, M. N. M. (2015). Influence of strategic orientation on SMEs access to finance in Nigeria. Asian Social Science, 11(4), p. 298.

Azeem, M.; Ahmed, M.; Haider, S. & Sajjad, M. (2021). Expanding competitive advantage through organizational culture, knowledge sharing and organizational innovation. Technology in Society, 66, pp. 101-635.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.

Bertheussen, B. A. (2021). Sustained competitive advantage based on industry-specific institutional frameworks. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, 697936.

Clauss, T.; Kraus, S.; Kallinger, F. L.; Bican, P. M.; Brem, A. & Kailer, N. (2021). Organizational ambidexterity and competitive advantage: The role of strategic agility in the exploration-exploitation paradox. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(4), pp. 203-213.

Dash, D.; Farooq, R.; Panda, J. S. & Sandhyavani, K. V. (2019). Internet of Things (IoT): The New Paradigm of HRM and Skill Development in the Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0). IUP Journal of Information Technology, 15(4), pp. 21-32.

Dirisu, J. I.; Iyiola, O. & Ibidunni, O. S. (2013). Product differentiation: A tool of competitive advantage and optimal organizational performance (A study of Unilever Nigeria PLC). European Scientific Journal, 9(34).

Eniola, A. A. & Ektebang, H. (2014). SME firms performance in Nigeria: Competitive advantage and its impact. International journal of Research studies in management, 3(2), pp. 75-86.

Erbaş, M.; Kabak, M.; Özceylan, E. & Çetinkaya, C. (2018). Optimal siting of electric vehicle charging stations: A gIS-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis. Energy, 163, pp. 1017-1031.

Hanmaikyur, T. J. (2016). Effect of entrepreneurial marketing practices on the performance of small and medium scale enterprises in Makurdi metropolis of Benue state, Nigeria. Unpublished PhD Thesis.

Harjadi, D.; Yuniawan, A.; Abdurrahman, A.; Dananjoyo, R.; Filatrovi, E. W. & Arraniri, I. (2020). Product characteristics, market competitive strategies, and SMEs performance: Testing their relationships. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), pp. 613-620.

Hoe, L. C. & Mansori, S. (2018). The effects of product quality on customer satisfaction and loyalty: Evidence from Malaysian engineering industry. International Journal of Industrial Marketing, 3(1), p. 20.

Hosseini, A. S.; Soltani, S. & Mehdizadeh, M. (2018). Competitive advantage and its impact on new product development strategy (Case study: ToosNirro technical firm). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(2), p. 17.

Huang, H.; Gartner, G.; Krisp, J. M.; Raubal, M. & Van de Weghe, N. (2018). Location based services: Ongoing evolution and research agenda. Journal of Location Based Services, 12(2), pp. 63-93.

Istanti, E.; Sanusi, R. & Daengs, G. S. (2020). Impacts of Price, Promotion and Go Food Consumer Satisfaction in Faculty of Economic and Business Students of Bhayangkara University Surabaya. Ekspektra: JurnalBisnisdanManajemen, 4(02), pp. 104-120.

Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), pp. 607-610.

Lakhal, L. (2009). Impact of quality on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(5), pp. 637-645.

Meyers, D. C.; Durlak, J. A. & Wandersman, A. (2012). The quality implementation framework: a synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. American journal of community psychology, 50, pp. 462-480.

Nguyen, V. (2020). Human capital, capital structure choice and firm profitability in developing countries: An empirical study in Vietnam. Accounting, 6(2), pp. 127-136.

Olokundun, M.; Ogbari, M. E.; Falola, H. & Ibidunni, A. S. (2022). Leveraging 5G network for digital innovation in small and medium enterprises: a conceptual review. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(1), pp. 1-10.

Peter, M. M. (2020). Factors influencing competitive advantage among supermarkets in Kenya: A case of nakumatt supermarket. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 9(1), pp. 83-97.

Porter, M. E. (2011). Competitive advantage of nations: creating and sustaining superior performance. Simon and Schuster. Free Press. New York, NY 10020.

Romero-Martínez, A. M.; García-Muiña, F. E.; Chidlow, A. & Larimo, J. (2019). Formal and informal institutional differences between home and host country and location choice: Evidence from the Spanish Hotel Industry. Management International Review, 59(1), pp. 41-65.

Sekaran, U. (2003). Towards a guide for novice research on research methodology: Review and proposed methods. Journal of Cases of Information Technology, 8(4), pp. 24-35.

Setyawati, I. (2022). Achieving the company’s competitive advantage by improving service quality. ENDLESS: International Journal of Future Studies, 5(2), pp. 87-94.

Shim, J. P.; Van den Dam, R.; Aiello, S.; Penttinen, J.; Sharda, R. & French, A. (2022). The transformative effect of 5G on business and society in the age of the fourth industrial revolution. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 50(1), p. 29.

Sinngu, T. & Antwi, M. (2014). Competitiveness of the South African citrus fruit industry relative to its Southern Hemisphere competitors (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Africa).

Smętkowski, M.; Celińska-Janowicz, D. & Wojnar, K. (2021). Location patterns of advanced producer service firms in Warsaw: A tale of agglomeration in the era of creativity. Cities, 108, pp. 102-137.

Suartama, I. K.; Setyosari, P. & Ulfa, S. (2019). Development of an instructional design model for mobile blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(16), p. 71.

Tiwari, S. P. (2022). Organizational Competitiveness and Digital Governance Challenges. Archives of Business Research, 10(3).

Yerima, S. Y. & Bashar, A. (2022). A novel Android botnet detection system using image-based and manifest file features. Electronics, 11(3), p. 486.

Zameer, H.; Wang, Y. & Yasmeen, H. (2020). Reinforcing green competitive advantage through green production, creativity and green brand image: implications for cleaner production in China. Journal of cleaner production, 247, pp. 11-29.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-02

How to Cite

Lawal, A. T., Jimoh, A. ., Brimah, A. B. ., Lewis-Ambrose, D. ., Ismail, D. ., & Bakare, W. O. . (2024). Product Characteristics, Location and Competitive Advantage: Evidence from Electronic Gadget Outlets. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Œconomica, 20(4), 73–90. Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDOE/article/view/2890

Issue

Section

Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth