The Age of Digital Entrepreneurship and Digital Information Processing for Entrepreneurs: Are the Entrepreneurs in the Rural, Limpopo Province, South Africa Ready for This Era?
Abstract
The digital divide between urban and rural areas persists as a major challenge in achieving inclusive and sustainable development in South Africa. In rural provinces like Limpopo in South Africa, communities face significant barriers in accessing and utilizing digital skills, hindering their entrepreneurial potential and limiting their ability to benefit from digital platforms that can enhance and sustain their businesses. The problem lies in the lack of digital literacy and infrastructure challenges that impede entrepreneurs and rural communities from effectively utilizing digital tools and participating in the digital economy. This is a conceptual paper based on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as its framework which advocates for usage of technology by entrepreneurs. In the realm of digital entrepreneurship, TAM plays a crucial role in understanding and fostering technology adoption by entrepreneurs (Venkatesh et al., 2012; Agarwal & Prasad, 2013). Recent studies highlight its relevance for digital entrepreneurs navigating a rapidly evolving technological landscape (Sussman & Siegal, 2017; Liang et al., 2017). As digital ventures rely heavily on user acceptance, integrating TAM into the entrepreneurial process becomes strategic. However, in South Africa, the access to Information Technology Infrastructure is always a problem and entrepreneurs end up conducting their business using traditional methods of advertising such as mouth to mouth and also traditional payment methods like usage of cash. This study recommends that entrepreneurs in Limpopo should adopt the usage of technology as soon as possible in order to grow and sustain their businesses.
References
*** (2013). National Development Plan 2030: Our Future, make it Work. National Planning Commission. Pretoria: Government printers.
*** (2015). National Development Plan 2030 and Small Business: Moving South Africa Forward. Department of Small Business Development. Retrieved from https://www.dsbd.gov.za/Resource%20Centre/NDP%20and%20SMMEs.pdf.
*** (2016). General Household Survey 2015. Statistics South Africa. Retrieved from http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0318/P03182015.pdf.
*** (2016). South Africa Connect: Creating Opportunities, Ensuring Inclusion. South Africa’s Broadband Policy. Department of Telecommunications and Postal Services. Retrieved from https://www.dtps.gov.za.
*** (2019). Continuous National Household Sample Survey. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). Retrieved from https://www.ibge.gov.br.
*** (2019). Measuring the Digital Transformation: A Roadmap for the Future. OECD. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org,
*** (2019). South Africa Digital Economy Diagnostic. World Bank. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org.
*** (2020). General Household Survey. Statistics South Africa. Pretoria: Government printers.
*** (2020). Internet Access and Usage in South Africa. SAIGF (South African Internet Governance Forum). Retrieved from https://www.saigf.org.
*** (2020). Limpopo CoLab report for 2020. Unpublished document. University of Limpopo.
*** (2020). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2020. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Retrieved from https://www.itu.int.
*** (2020). The World Bank Digital Development Global Practice. World Bank. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org.
*** (2020). The World Bank Digital Development Global Practice. World Bank. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org.
*** (2021). Global Education Monitoring Report 2021/2: Non-state actors in education: Who chooses? Who loses? United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org.
*** (2021). Internet/Broadband Fact Sheet. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org.
*** (2021). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2021. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Retrieved from https://www.itu.int.
*** (2021). The Indian Telecom Services Performance Indicators. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). Retrieved from https://www.trai.gov.in.
*** (2022). DigiSkills Program. NEMISA. Retrieved from https://www.nemisa.co.za/digiskills-program/.
*** (2022). National Digital Inclusion Strategy. South African Department of Communications.
*** (2023). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023: Special Edition. United Nations. United States of America.
Agarwal, R. & Prasad, J. (2013). The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences, 44(4), 813-847.
Agarwal, R. & Selen, W. (2018). Dynamic capability building in service value networks for achieving service innovation. MIS Quarterly, 42(1), 145-167.
Ataguba, J. E.; Day, C. & McIntyre, D. (2018). Explaining the role of the social determinants of health on health inequality in South Africa. Global Health Action, 8(1).
Brown, A. & Green, B. (2019). Digital Inclusion in Urban Environments: A Comprehensive Analysis. Journal of Digital Access, 5(2), 123-145.
Budlender, D. & Lund, F. (2018). South Africa: A legacy of family disruption. Development and Change, 42(4), 925-946.
Chatterjee, S. & Kumar, A. (2021). Digital transformation in small and medium-sized enterprises: Strategies and challenges. Journal of Business Research, 123, 23-35.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Davis, F. D.; Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Dwivedi, Y. K. et al. (2017). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 42, 1-7.
Ernst & Young. (2016). EY Digital Deal Economy Study 2016: Africa Attractiveness Survey. Pretoria, South Africa.
Jones, C. (2020). Bridging the Gap: Understanding the Digital Divide.
Kergroach, S. (2020). Giving momentum to SME digitalisation. OECD centre for Entrepreneurship. Paris, France.
Kraus, S.; Palmer, C.; Kailer, N.; Kallinger, F. L. & Spitzer, J. (2019). Digital entrepreneurship: A research agenda on new business models for the twenty-first century. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(2), 353-375.
Kshetri, N. (2017). Cybersecurity and International Relations. London: Polity Press.
Nambisan, S.; Wright, M. & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges, and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8).
Nkuna, N. & Nkomo, T. S. (2020). Bridging the digital divide in rural South Africa: A study on the impact of digital infrastructure on business performance. South African Journal of Information Management, 22(1), 1-9.
Phiri, M. & Munthali, T. (2019). An analysis of the determinants of poverty in South Africa. Economic Research Southern Africa. https://www.econrsa.org.
Rogan, M. & Reynolds, J. (2018). The working poor in South Africa: Labour market dynamics and poverty as a multi-dimensional phenomenon. Development Southern Africa, 35(6), 751-769.
Shane, S. (2003). A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Shane, S. (2017). Born Digital: How Children Grow Up in a Digital Age. New York: Springer.
Smith, J. et al. (2021). Rural Technology Access: A Study of Challenges and Solutions. Journal of Rural Studies, 15(3), 201-215.
Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
Venkatesh, V.; Thong, J. Y. & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.
Von Briel, F.; Davidsson, P. & Recker, J. (2018). Digital technologies as external enablers of new venture creation in the IT hardware sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(1), 47-69.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mankolo Xaverine Lethoko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The author fully assumes the content originality and the holograph signature makes him responsible in case of trial.