In Search of Corruption Prevention Model: Case Study from Indonesia Village Fund
Keywords:
corruption; fraud triangle; fraud diamond; fraud pentagon; Indonesia village fundAbstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore the causes of corruption in Indonesia village fund and to discuss the possible strategy to combat corruption. The research uses explanatory case study approach to get understanding through multiple types of data sources such as interviews, documents, publicly reports and news as well as government reports related to the corruption and village fund. Further, this study uses criminology theories to introduce a corruption prevention model. The results of the study describe various theories related to the causes of corruption from various approaches, such as criminology, psychology and social issues. The corruption prevention model produced in this study is the result of a combination of these theories that are adapted to various techniques that are often found in corruption in village funds. The corruption prevention model is expected to give a practical contribution as one of the references to curb corruption more efficiently.
References
Cressey, D. R. (1973). Other people's money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement (revised edition). Montclair. NJ: Patterson Smith Publishing Corporation.
Dorminey, J., Fleming, A. S., Kranacher, M.-J., & Riley Jr, R. A. (2012). The evolution of fraud theory. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(2), 555–579. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-50131
Graycar, A., & Sidebottom, A. (2012). Corruption and control: a corruption reduction approach. Journal of Financial Crime, 19(4), 384–399. https://doi.org/10.1108/13590791211266377
Hoekstra, A., & Kaptein, M. (2014). Understanding integrity policy formation processes: A case study in the Netherlands of the conditions for change. Public Integrity, 16(3), 243–264.
Horwath, C. (2011). Putting the Freud in Fraud: Why the Fraud Triangle Is No Longer Enough. IN Horwath, Crowe.
Indonesia Corruption Watch. (2018). Outlook dana desa 2018 potensi penyalahgunaan anggaran desa di tahun politik. Web page. Retrieved from https://antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/outlook_desa_2018_-_icw.pdf, date 07.06.2019
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2018). Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja. Web page. Retrieved from https://www.kpk.go.id/id/publikasi/laporan/laporan-akuntabilitas-kinerja/768-laporan-akuntabilitas-lakip-kpk-2018, date 09.06.2019.
Mandala, M., & Freilich, J. D. (2017). Preventing successful assassination attacks by terrorists: An environmental criminology approach. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 3(3), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-09-2016-0022
Peltier-Rivest, D., & Lanoue, N. (2015). Cutting fraud losses in Canadian organisations. Journal of Financial Crime, 22(3), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2013-0064
Prabowo, H. Y., Syamsudin, M., & Sriyana, J. (2012). Understanding Corruption from Behavioral Perspective: A Case Study of Yogyakarta Special Province. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, (55).
Ramamoorti, S., Morrison, D., & Koletar, J. W. (2009). Bringing freud to fraud: Understanding the state-of-mind of the C-Level suite/white collar offender through "ABC" analysis. Institute for Fraud Prevention (IFP) at West Virginia University.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organisational behavior. Pearson Education Limited.
Sutherland, E. H., Cressey, D. R., & Luckenbill, D. F. (1992). Principles of criminology. Altamira Press.
Wells, J. (2005). Fraud Triangle. J. Wells, Principles of Fraud Examination. Hoboken, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author fully assumes the content originality and the holograph signature makes him responsible in case of trial.
