Disruptive Changes and Emerging Risks within Internal Auditing Profession: A Review from South Africa
Keywords:
South Africa; emerging risks, auditing profession; disruptive technology; competencies; environmentAbstract
The pervasive advances in information technology, coupled with environmental changes and
the gruelling real-time stakeholder demands consistently challenge the auditing profession. Modernday
complex interconnected business networks, are progressively making the true nature of emerging
risks difficult to assess. Some of these emerging risks are like ticking time-bombs that can erupt rapidly
and dramatically without cautionary. Emerging risks are concealed risk exposures with potential to
trigger unanticipated and disconcerting shocks. As a result, organisations are more frequently turning
to their internal auditing departments to help with the task of identifying emerging risks and guiding
risk management protocols consistent with the dynamic risk landscape. The auditing professionals are
increasingly being judged and evaluated for their ability to adapt and be forward-looking in matters of
risk assessment. For that reason, internal auditors are forced to adopt laterally think and adapt to
emerging risks. Several examples in recent years have shown the immense responsibility that internal
auditing professionals must carry, and the present paper is to be seen as a contribution to understanding
the implications of the changing risk landscape on the internal auditing profession. The qualitative
thematic analysis identifies the overwhelming need for agility within the internal auditing profession,
that emerging risks are engraining business operations, and remain significant determinants of
governance and accountability. The results of the study have several policy implications and ignites
pertinent future research propositions.
References
environment: Knowledge management and knowledge management technology. Elsevier.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research
journal, 9(2), pp. 27-40.
Byrnes, P. E.; Al-Awadhi, A.; Gullvist, B.; Brown-Liburd, H.; Teeter, R.; Warren Jr, J. D. & Vasarhelyi,
M. (2018). Evolution of Auditing: From the Traditional Approach to the Future Audit 1. Continuous
Auditing: Theory and Application, pp. 285-297. Emerald Publishing Limited.
Chambers, A. D. & Odar, M. (2015). A new vision for internal audit. Managerial Auditing Journal,
30(1), pp. 34-55.
Coetzee, P. & Lubbe, D. (2014). Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of risk-based internal audit
engagements. International Journal of Auditing, 18(2), pp. 115-125.
Doppelt, B. (2017). Leading change toward sustainability: A change-management guide for business,
government and civil society. Routledge.
Ratzinger-Sakel, N. V. & Gray, G. L. (2015). Moving toward a learned profession and purposeful
integration: Quantifying the gap between the academic and practice communities in auditing and
identifying new research opportunities. Journal of Accounting Literature, 35, pp. 77-103.
Rezaee, Z.; Sharbatoghlie, A.; Elam, R. & McMickle, P. L. (2018). Continuous auditing: Building
automated auditing capability. Continuous Auditing: Theory and Application, pp. 169-190. Emerald
Publishing Limited.
Jurisch, M. C.; Rosenberg, Z. & Krcmar, H. (2016). Emergent risks in business process change projects.
Business Process Management Journal, 22(4), pp. 791-811.
Soh, D. S. & Martinov-Bennie, N. (2015). Internal auditors’ perceptions of their role in environmental,
social and governance assurance and consulting. Managerial Auditing Journal, 30(1), pp. 80-111.
Yee, C. S.; Sujan, A.; James, K. & Leung, J. K. (2017). Perceptions of Singaporean internal audit
customers regarding the role and effectiveness of internal audit. Asian Journal of Business and
Accounting, 1(2), pp. 147-174.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author fully assumes the content originality and the holograph signature makes him responsible in case of trial.
