Enhancing Critical Thinking in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: An Wide Overview
Keywords:
critical thinking, artificial intelligence, generative AI, generative artificial intelligence, GenAIAbstract
Nowadays, the increased access to information and artificial intelligence (AI) required us to become better critical thinkers. In addition, the access to generative AI simplified our work with information and sources of information, while requiring. This article dive into the topic of critical thinking and the use of generative AI, synthesizing findings from the last three years and offering an evidence-based background and recommendations to practitioners for effective and ethical integrated generative AI that nurtures rather than diminishes the cognitive rigor supported by critical thinking.
References
Essien, A., Bukoye, O.T., O’Dea, C., & Kremantzis, M.D. (2024). The influence of AI text generators on critical thinking skills in UK business schools. Studies in Higher Education, 49, 865 - 882.
Federiakin, D., Molerov, D., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., & Maur, A. (2024). Prompt engineering as a new 21st century skill. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1366434). Frontiers Media SA.
Gerlich, M. (2025). AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6.
Goodfellow, I. J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. Advances in neural information processing systems, 27, 2672-2680.
Goyal, A. (2025). AI as a Cognitive Partner: A Systematic Review of the Influence of AI on Metacognition and Self-Reflection in Critical Thinking. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 10(3), 1231-1238.
Jackson, J. (2025). Increased AI use linked to eroding critical thinking skills. Phys. org.
Koos, S., & Wachsmann, S. (2023). Navigating the impact of chatgpt/gpt4 on legal academic examinations: Challenges, opportunities and recommendations. Media Iuris, 6, 255–270. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v6i2.45270
Lee, H. P., Sarkar, A., Tankelevitch, L., Drosos, I., Rintel, S., Banks, R., & Wilson, N. (2025). The impact of generative AI on critical thinking: Self-reported reductions in cognitive effort and confidence effects from a survey of knowledge workers. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-22).
Lin, H., Wei, W., & Lu, H. (2025). Facilitator or barrier? A systematic review on the relationship between Artificial Intelligence technologies and the development of critical thinking skills. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 7(2).
Mei, K. X., & Weber, N. (2025). Designing AI Systems that Augment Human Performed vs. Demonstrated Critical Thinking. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.14689
Melisa, R., Ashadi, A., Triastuti, A., Hidayati, S., Salido, A., Ero, P. E. L., Marlini, C., Zefrin, Z., & Al Fuad, Z. (2025). Critical Thinking in the Age of AI: A Systematic Review of AI's Effects on Higher Education. Educational Process: International Journal, 14, e2025031. doi: 10.22521/edupij.2025.14.31
O’Dea, X. (2024). Generative AI: is it a paradigm shift for higher education?. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 811-816.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Rowman & Littlefield.
Premkumar, P. P., Yatigammana, M. R. K. N., & Kannangara, S. (2024). Impact of generative AI on critical thinking skills in undergraduates: A systematic review. Journal of Desk Research Review and Analysis, 2(1).
Prike, T., Holloway, J., & Ecker, U. K. (2024). Intellectual humility is associated with greater misinformation discernment and metacognitive insight but not response bias. advances. in/psychology, 2, e020433.
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
Sardi, J., Candra, O., Yuliana, D. F., Yanto, D. T. P., & Eliza, F. (2025). How Generative AI Influences Students' Self-Regulated Learning and Critical Thinking Skills? A Systematic Review. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 15(1).
Stadler, M., Bannert, M., & Sailer, M. (2024). Cognitive ease at a cost: LLMs reduce mental effort but compromise depth in student scientific inquiry. Computers in Human Behavior, 160, 108386.
Suriano, R., Plebe, A., Acciai, A., & Fabio, R. A. (2025). Student interaction with ChatGPT can promote complex critical thinking skills. Learning and Instruction, 95, 102011.
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 28.
Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: the relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 15.
Wang, J., & Fan, W. (2025). The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: insights from a meta-analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1-21.
Wang, X., Leng, C. H., & Zainuddin, Z. (2024). The effectiveness of generative AI in education: A systematic review of empirical study. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 12(4), 48-66.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Didactica Danubiensis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
