Current Dimensions of Affirming National Dignity in a Pluricultural Context
Keywords:
national dignity, national identity, pluriculturalism, intercultural dialogue, national valuesAbstract
The article analyses the contemporary dimensions of affirming national dignity within the
current pluricultural context, characterized by accelerated social dynamics, globalization processes, and
the intensification of interactions among cultures. National dignity is approached as an axiological
expression of collective identity, grounded in historical, cultural, and symbolic values assumed at both
individual and community levels. From this perspective, national dignity reflects a community’s
capacity to value its own identity, to affirm continuity, and to maintain cohesion within a space shaped
by cultural diversity. Several current dimensions of affirming national dignity are highlighted. The
cultural dimension focuses on promoting language, traditions, and tangible and intangible heritage as
markers of historical continuity. The axiological dimension emphasizes the assumption of moral, civic,
and spiritual values that support collective self-respect and social responsibility. The educational
dimension underlines the role of forming identity awareness, values education, and the development of
respect for cultural plurality. The communicative dimension is expressed through intercultural dialogue,
value exchange, and the capacity to represent national identity within an open framework of
intercultural relations. The civic and institutional dimension reflects the affirmation of national dignity
through public policies, normative frameworks, and social initiatives aimed at protecting identity and
promoting community cohesion. The content emphasizes the affirmation of national dignity as an open,
relational, and dynamic process, achieved through valuing one’s own identity in interaction with other
cultures. National dignity is outlined as a resource for identity balance, community cohesion, and social
responsibility, with relevance for integrating national dignity within a contemporary pluricultural space.
References
Albu, G. (2017). Education, human dignity, respect between people and self-respect. Didactica Pro…,
Journal of Educational Theory and Practice, 4(104), 5–10.
Antoci, D. (2020). Theory and methodology of the formation of the value orientation of adolescents
and young people. Print-Caro.
Bennegad, R. (1993). One migrant can hide another. In A.N.P.A.S. (ed.), Enfances et cultures:
Problématique de la différence et pratiques interculturelles. Éditions Privat.
Blaga, L. (2011). The Culture Trilogy. Humanitas.
Bunescu, G. (1998). School and moral values. Theories and practices of psychosociomoral
development. Editura Didactică și Pedagogică.
Callo, T. (2010). The Scientific School of Transpresent Pedagogy. Pontos.
Constitution of the Republic of Moldova. (1994). In Official Gazette of the Republic of Moldova, No.
Republic of Moldova.
DEX Online. (2026). Dignity. DEX Online. https://dexonline.ro/definitie/demnitate
Duhlicher, O. (2010). Intercultural communication – premise and mechanism for the formation of
intercultural competence. University Studies. Scientific Journal of the State University of Moldova,
(34), 118–123.
George, G. (2001). Philosophy of culture. University course. National School of Political and
Administrative Studies. https://ru.scribd.com/doc/43970406/Filosofia-Culturii
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. (1966). Adopted at New York on December 16,
; ratified by the Republic of Moldova on July 28, 1990. Official Gazette of the Republic of
Moldova, 1998.
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (1966). Adopted by the UN General
Assembly (Resolution 2200 A [XXI]); entered into force January 3, 1967. In: International Treaties to
which the Republic of Moldova is a Party (Vol. I, 1998).
Jandt, F. E. (2004). An introduction to intercultural communication: Identities in a global community.
Sage Publications.
Linton, R. (1998). The Cultural Background of Personality. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis
Group, 114 p.
Merolla, J. L., Ramos, J. M., Zechmeister, E. J. (2007). Crisis, charisma and consequences: Evidence
from the 2004 US presidential election. Journal of Politics, 69(1), 30–42.
Pâslaru, V. (2006). Value and axiological education: definition and structuring. Didactica Pro...,
Journal of Educational Theory and Practice, 1(35), 3–10.
Denis de Rougemont, D. (1990). On the role of Europe in the dialogue of cultures. Cadmos, European
Centre for Culture, (50), 6–22.
Silistraru, N. (2006). Values of modern education. Institute of Education Sciences.
Tylor, E. B. (2016). Primitive culture. researches into the development of mythology, philosophy,
religion, art, and custom, (Vol. I). Dover Publications.
UNESCO. (n.d.). Why intercultural dialogue matters today? UNESCO. Retrieved January 8, 2026, from
Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (1948). Adopted at New York on December 10, 1948; acceded
to by the Republic of Moldova by Parliament Decision no. 217-XII of July 28, 1990. Official Bulletin
of the Republic of Moldova, 1990(008).
Ziglar, Z. (2019). From good to excellent. Curtea Veche.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Didactica Danubiensis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
