Student-Centred Communication in an Intercultural Educational Context

Authors

  • Olga Alcaz Universitatea Pedagogică de Stat „ION CREANGĂ” din Chișinău

Keywords:

intercultural competence, learning engagement, pedagogical communication, cultural diversity

Abstract

This paper examines the role of student-centred communication in addressing cultural and linguistic diversity in technical and vocational education. It aims to demonstrate why communication oriented toward learners’ experiences is essential for inclusive and effective teaching in heterogeneous educational contexts. Prior Work The study builds on established research in student-centred pedagogy, intercultural education, and teacher – student interaction, which emphasises participation, dialogue, and cultural responsiveness as key conditions for meaningful learning. Approach A qualitative theoretical analysis was conducted, based on a systematic review and synthesis of international academic literature focusing on communication practices, intercultural competences, and learning resources in vocational and technical education. Results The analysis indicates that student-centred communication enhances learner engagement, supports the effective use of learning resources, and improves educational interactions in culturally diverse settings. It also identifies persistent challenges, including language barriers and limited pedagogical preparation for diversity. Implications The findings highlight the need to strengthen intercultural and communication competences within initial and continuing teacher education, particularly for vocational and technical educators. Value The paper offers an integrated conceptual perspective that connects student-centred communication with intercultural education in technical and vocational contexts, contributing original insights for inclusive pedagogical practice.

References

Banks, J. A. (2015). An introduction to multicultural education. Boston: Pearson.

Bartolomé, A., Castañeda, L., & Adell, J. (2018). Personalisation in educational technology: The absence of pedagogy. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15.

Biesta, G. (2015). What is education for? European Journal of Education, 50(1).

Central Council of Education. (2021). Japanese-style school education in the Reiwa era. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.

Freeman, S., et al. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Gulson, K. N., & Sellar, S. (2019). Emerging data infrastructures and the new topologies of education policy. Environment and Planning D.

Hangartner, J., Toyokawa, Y., & Ramírez, M. G. (2025). Anticipating data sharing for student-centred education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(1).

Hangartner, J., et al. (2024). The fabrication of the autonomous learner. London: Routledge.

Knox, J., Williamson, B., & Bayne, S. (2020). Machine behaviourism: Future visions of learnification and datafication. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 31–45.

Lupton, D., & Williamson, B. (2017). The datafied child: The dataveillance of children and implications for their rights. New Media & Society, 19(5), 780–794.

OECD. (2018). Global competence for an inclusive world. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Ogata, H., et al. (2024). Educational DX and data use. Tokyo: Springer.

Swissuniversities. (2022). Grundsätze und Leitvorstellungen für die Entwicklung der Lehre [Principles and guiding concepts for the development of teaching]. Bern: Swissuniversities.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-01

How to Cite

Alcaz, O. (2026). Student-Centred Communication in an Intercultural Educational Context. Didactica Danubiensis, 6(1), 522–529. Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/DD/article/view/3841

Issue

Section

Articles