Empirically Investigating the Presence of Positive Accounting Research as the Meta- Theory for Accounting Academics:

Further Evidence from Saudi Arabia

  • Khalid Al-Adeem King Saud University
Keywords: Accounting Academics; Accounting Academe; Accounting Sociology; Saudi Arabia; Agency Theory; Positive Accounting Methodology; Doctoral education;

Abstract

This study empirically explores the extent to which accounting academics in Saudi Arabia apply agency theory conceptually and methodologically. All accounting academics in Saudi Arabia have been awarded decorates abroad from various institutions worldwide, which makes them suitable subjects to investigate whether they are dominated by positive accounting methodology to assess its global impact. Fifty respondents volunteered to take the web-based questionnaire. Almost reaching an agreement that agency theory was originated in accounting conventions, sampled accounting academics concur that such a theory is an accounting theory. Controversially, while they agree with propositions of Jensen and Meckling, (1976), they are unsure that agency theory is the most suitable theory for accounting research and are undecided in deeming the view that C.E.O.s as agents and shareholders as principals is the only correct way to build understanding on the nature of the corporation. They are generally aware of positive accounting methodology and are exposed to it in their doctoral studies. Not constraining accounting inquiry to phenomena that behave rationally, they nonetheless assume rationality in almost all observed behavior in accounting.

References

Alameen, B. I. (1997). Accounting choices from positive accounting theory perspective. Accounting, 4(12), s. 44-48. (in the Arabic Language).

Al-Adeem, K. (2017). Role of doctoral education in shaping minds and thinking: Reflection on my doctoral education at Case Western Reserve University. International Journal of Critical Accounting. 9 (5-6): 494–513.

Al-Adeem, K. (2019a). Who Decides What is Publishable? Empirical Study on the Influence of a Journal’s Editorial Board on the Observed Paradigm Shift in US Academic Accounting Research. The North American Accounting Studies 2 (1): 1-21.

Al-Adeem, K. (2019b). Critique and an Extension of Nohora García’ s Understanding Mattessich and Ijiri: A Study of Accounting Thought. ‏ International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting. 9(4): 420-438.

Al-Adeem, K. R. (2021). Properly identified imaginary needs, an inaccurately proposed methodology: The case of Rochester School of Accountancy’s positive accounting methodology. Working Paper. King Saud University. Saudi Arabia.

Al-Adeem, K.R. and Fogarty, T.J. (2010). Accounting Theory: A Neglected Topic in Academic Accounting Research, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing AG & Co. KG Theodor-Heuss-Ring 26, 50668 Köln, Germany.

Al-Adeem, K., & Al-Sogair, I. Y. (2019). Effectiveness of the board of directors in monitoring executive management: Preliminary evidence from Saudi Arabia. Journal of Governance and Regulation. 8(3): 72-82.

Al-Khonain, S., Al-Adeem, K. (2020). Corporate Governance and Financial Reporting Quality: Preliminary Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 4(1), 109-116. http://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.4(1).109-116.2020.

Al-Moussa, A. A. Experience of scholarships to foreign universities in Saudi Arabia : a model for investment in human resources & their contribution to development. Proceeding of the Arabian Conference of Higher Education. Cairo, Egypt. May 31-June 2/2009. Pages: 805-819> (in the Arabic Language). Retrieved: http://search.shamaa.org/FullRecord?ID=27668

Alkhadash, H M. (2004). Directions of accounting research in Jordanian peer-reviewed journals. Almanarah. 10(2): 289-313. (in the Arabic Language).

Al-Shabeeb, R. and Al-Adeem, K. (2019). Whether Earning Management Is An Ethical Practice: An Exploratory Study. Global Journal of Economics and Business. 6 (1) 62-80. (in the Arabic Language).

Almotairi, 1997). Contemporary directions in accounting research. Accounting (in Arabic Language). 4 (12), 36-39. (in the Arabic Language).

Almotairy, O. S. and Motwali, T.A. (2002). Contemporary research approaches (interpretive and critical) and their absence from Arabian accounting research. 5(1): 1-37. (in the Arabic Language).

Alshamam, M.A. H and Abdula Alhafez, A. M. K. (2020). Influence of directions of accounting research during the period 1926-2019 on constructing accounting theory. LFU (French-Lebanese University) 5(1): 713-745. (in the Arabic Language).

Amer, S., & Sajjad, M. A. M. (2014). Mudarabah – A new paradigm for corporate governance. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(6), 98-102.

Avelé, D. (2014), Positive accounting theory: theoretical and critical perspectives, “International Journal of Critical Accounting”, 6(4), s. 396-415.

Belkaoui, A. R.(1996). “Accounting, A Multiparadigm Science.” Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

Ball, R. and Brown, P. (1968). ‘An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers’, Journal of Accounting Research, 6 (2) 159 - 178.

Beaver, W.H. (1968). ‘An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers’. Journal of Accounting Research, 6 (Empirical Research in Accounting: Selected Studies selected studies), 67 - 92.

Beyer, B., Herrmann, D., Meek, G.K. and Rapley, E.T. 2010. What it means to be an accounting professor: A concise career guide for doctoral students in accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp.227 - 244.

Bricker, R.J. (1987). An Empirical Investigation of the Intellectual Structure of the Accounting Discipline: A Citational Analysis of Selected Scholarly Journals 1983-1986. Ph. D. Dissertation. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
Boland, L. A., & Gordon, I. M. (1992). Criticizing positive accounting theory. Contemporary Accounting Research, 9(1), 142-170.

Brinn, T., and M. J. Jones. 2008. The composition of editorial boards in accounting: A UK perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21 (1): 5–35.

Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo Academicus. Stanford University Press.

Chabrak, N. (2005). “The politics of transcendence: hermeneutic phenomenology and accounting policy.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16(2): 701-716.

Chabrak, N., & Burrowes, A. (2006). The Language of the Rochester School: positive accounting theory Deconstructed. In 8th IPA Conference-The Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Accounting Conference.

Chambers, R.J. (1993). “Positive accounting theory and the PA cult.” ABACUS. 29(1):1-26.

Christenson, (1983). “Methodology of positive accounting.” The Accounting Review. Jan. 58(1): 1-22.

Collin, S. O. Y., Tagesson, T., Andersson, A., Cato, J., & Hansson, K. (2009). Explaining the choice of accounting standards in municipal corporations: Positive accounting theory and institutional theory as competitive or concurrent theories. Critical perspectives on Accounting, 20(2), 141-174.

Committe, B. (2016) Proposal for university-wide PhD programme of study the purpose of which is to promote innovation in accounting (and other discipline) research, International Journal of Critical Accounting, 8 (2), 144–152.

Cushing, B.E. (1989) ‘A Kuhnian interpretation of the historical evolution of accounting’, The Accounting Historians Journal, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp.1–41.

Davis, J. P. (1897). The Nature of Corporations. Political Science Quarterly, 12(2), 273-294.

Demski, J. S. (1988). Positive accounting theory: A review. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(6), 623-629.

Demski, J. S. (2007). Is accounting an academic discipline?. Accounting Horizons, 21(2), 153–157.

Dopuch, N. (1979). “Empirical vs. non-empirical contributions to accounting theory development,” in J.J. Davis (ed.). pp. 67-83. “Accounting Research Convocation on the Subject of Seeking Full Disclosure.” University of Alabama. November.

Dyckman, T. R., & Zeff, S. A. (2015). Accounting research: past, present, and future. Abacus, 51(4), 511-524.

Flellingham, J.C. (2007). Is accounting an academic discipline? Accounting Horizons, 21(2), 159–163.

Fogarty, T.J. (2011). ‘The social construction of research advice: The American Accounting Association plays Miss Lonelyheart’. Accounting and the Public Interest, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp.32 - 51.

Fogarty, T. J. and C. Liao. (2009) Blessed are the gatekeepers: A longitudinal study of the editorial boards of The Accounting Review. Issues in Accounting Education 24 (3): 299–318.

Fogarty, T. and G. Jonas. 2010. The hand that rocks the cradle: Disciplinary socialization at the American Accounting Association’s Doctoral Consortium. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 21 (4): 303–317.

Fogarty, T. J., and G. A. Jonas. (2013). Author characteristics for major accounting journals: Differences among similarities 1989–2009. Issues in Accounting Education 28 (4), 731–757.

Fogarty, T. J. and A. Zimmerman. (2019). Few are called, fewer are chosen: Elite reproduction in US academic accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 60, 1-17.

Feyerabend, P. (1987). Science in a Free Society. Great Britain: Therford Press Limited, Therford Norfork.

Feyerabend, P. (2010). Against Method. Verso, London, UK. New Edition Introduced by Ian Hacking (4 th ed.). Verso, New York: United States.

Feyerabend, P., & Oberheim, E. (2011). The Tyranny of Science. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Gaffikin, M.J.R. (1988) Legacy of the golden age: recent developments in the methodology of accounting, ABACUS, 24 (1), 16–36.

Gillispie, C. C. (1960). The Edge of Objectivity: An Essay in the History of Scientific Ideas (Vol. 52). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Gaukroger, S. (2012). Objectivity: A very Short Introduction. (Vol. 316). Oxford University Press.

Harris, S. B. (2016). Auditor Independence and the Role of the PCAOB in Investor Protection. Speech delivered at the International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN) Annual Conference. San Francisco, USA. Retrieved: https://pcaobus.org/news-events/speeches/speech-detail/auditor-independence-and-the-role-of-the-pcaob-in-investor-protection_616 last visit 11/23/2020

Hassan, N. T. (2014), Determines of accounting choices in Saudi public companies, Egyptian Accounting Review, 4(8): 73-107. (in the Arabic Language).

Heck, J., and B. Jensen. 2007. An analysis of the evolution of research contributions by The Accounting Review, 1926-–005. Accounting Historians Journal 34 (2): 109–142.

Hines, R.D. (1988), Popper's methodology of falsificationism and accounting research, “The Accounting Review”, s. 657-662.

Hopwood, A. G. (1987). “The archeology of accounting systems.” Accounting, Organizations and Society. 12 (3): 207-234.

Hopwood, A. G. (2007) “Whither accounting research.” The Accounting Review. 82 (5):1365-1374.

Hoyden, G. M., Bodie, M. T., & Ribstein, L. E. (2011). The Uncorporation and the Unraveling of" Nexus of Contracts" Theory. Available at: http://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1156&context=mlr

Ibraheem, A.A M. (2002), Accounting Theory. (in the Arabic Language).

Ibraheem, A.A.M. (2008), Evaluating traditional and modern research approaches in contracting accounting theory. Contemporary Commercial Research Journal. 22(1): 50-85. (in the Arabic Language).

Ittonen, K. (2010). A theoretical examination of the role of auditing and the relevance of audit reports. Proceedings of the University of Vaasa. Teaching Aid Series VAASA YLIOPISTO

Jamal, K., & Sunder, S. (2011). Is mandated independence necessary for audit quality?. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(4-5), 284-292.

Jazar, M. M. A. (2019). Directions of Accounting Research Published in Journals in Saudi Arabia during the period 2001-2017. Public Administration Journal. 57(3): 529-548. (in the Arabic Language).

Jeanjean, T., Ramirez, C. (2009), Back to the origins of positive theories: A contribution to an analysis of paradigm changes in accounting research, Accounting in Europe, 6(1), s. 107-126.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1994). The nature of man. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 7(2), 4-19.

Kabalski, P. (2016), Why should accounting science be more normative?, “Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości”, (88), s. 61-72.

Kabir, H. (2010). Positive accounting theory and science . Journal of CENTRUM Cathedra, 3 (2),136-149.

Kaplan, S.E., Ruland, R.G. (1991), Positive theory, rationality and accounting regulation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 2(4): 361-374.

Kerlinger, F. N. (1979). Behavioral research: A conceptual approach. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Kinney, W.R. (1990). Editorial- The Accounting Review: 1987-1989. The Accounting Review, Vol. 65 No. 1, pp.158 - 270.

Kuhn, T. S. 1996. The Structure of Science Revolution, 3rd ed., Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Kornhauser, L. A. (2989). The Nexus of Contracts Approach to Corporations: A Comment on Easterbrook and Fischel”. Colum. L. Rev., 89, 1449.

Jeanjean, T., & Ramirez, C. (2009). Back to the origins of positive theories: A contribution to an analysis of paradigm changes in accounting research. Accounting in Europe, 6(1), 107-126.

Lee, P., J. Guthrie, and R. Gray. 1998. Accounting and management research: Passwords from the gatekeepers. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 11 (4): 371–406.

Lee, T. 1995. Shaping the US academic accounting research profession: The American Accounting Association and the social construction of a professional elite. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 6 (3): 241–261.

Lee, T. 1997. The editorial gatekeepers of the accounting academy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 10 (1): 11–30.

Lee, T. 1999. Anatomy of a professional elite: the executive committee of the American Accounting Association 1916–1996. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 10 (2): 247–264.

Lee, T. A. 2001. Sustaining a habitus. In Advances in Accountability: Regulation, Research, Gender and Justice, 8: 177-194.

Lee, T., and P. Williams. 1999. Accounting from the inside: Legitimating the accounting academic elite. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 10 (6): 867–895.

Manninen, A. 1996. The production of knowledge in accounting. Accounting, Organization and Society 21 (7/8): 655–674.

Mattessich, R. (1972). “Methodological preconditions and problems of a general theory of accounting.” The Accounting Review. Jul. 47 (3): 469-487.

Milne, M. J. (2002). Positive accounting theory, political costs and social disclosure analyses: a critical look. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(3), 369-395.

Mouck, T (1989), Irony of the golden age of accounting methodology. Accounting Historians Journal. 16(2), 3.

Mouck, T. (1990). Positive accounting theory as a Lakatosian research programme. Accounting and Business Research. 21(79): 231-239.

Mouck, T. (1992). “The rhetoric of science and the rhetoric of revolt in the “story” of positive accounting theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 5(4):35-56.

Ndjetcheu, L. (2012). An African critical interpretation of the positive theory of accounting of Watts and Zimmerman (1978, 1980, 1986). Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance. 1(1): 25-39.

Ochoa-Pachas, J. (2021). Descriptive studies are quantitative and can carry hypotheses. Academia Letters, Article 2760. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL2760.

Okcabol, F. and Tinker, T. (1990). “The market for positive theory: deconstructing the theory for excuses.” Advances in Public Interest. 3:71-95.

Oler, D. K., M. J. Oler, and C. J. Skousen. 2010. Characterizing accounting research. Accounting Horizons 24 (4): 635–670.

Oler, D. K., M. J., Oler, C. J. Skousen, and J. Talakai. 2016. Has concentration in the top accounting journals changed over time? Accounting Horizons 30 (1): 63–78.
Othamn, A.I. (2000), Evaluating the scientific methodology for the conceptual framework of positive accounting theory. Public Administration. 39(4): 729-772.

O'Connor, S. M., (2002), The inevitability of Enron and the impossibility of 'auditor independence' under the current audit system (March 1). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=303181 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.303181

Persson, M. E. (Ed.). (2016), AC Littleton's Final Thoughts 1on Accounting: A collection of Unpublished Essays, Foreword, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Preston, J. (2018). Feyerabend: Philosophy, Science and Society. John Wiley & Sons.

Reiter, S. A. 1998. Economics imperialism and the crisis in financial accounting research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 9 (2): 143–171.

Rodgers, J. L., and P. F. Williams. 1996. Patterns of research productivity and knowledge creation at The Accounting Review: 1967–1993. The Accounting Historians Journal 23 (1): 51–88.

Ronen, J. (2006). A proposed corporate governance reform: Financial statements insurance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23(1-2), 130-146.

Saraj, M.A. (1989), Analysis of the effectiveness of using normative approach and positive approach in accounting theorization. Public Administration. 63 (1): 143-176. (in Arabic).

Schwandt, T.A. (2001), Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry (2nd ed), New York: Sage publications.

Sinha, S. K. (2008). Positive accounting theory: A critique. The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices, 7(4), 7-16.

Srivastava, J., & Baag, P. K. (2020). Positive accounting theory and agency costs: A critical perspective. AIMS International. May.14 (2), 101-113

Stout, L.A., (2012). The shareholder value myth: how putting shareholders first harms investors, corporations, and the public. Berrett¬ Koehler.

Sterling, R. S. (1990). “Positive accounting theory: An assessment.” ABACUS. 26(2):97-135.

Subramaniam, N. (2006). “Agency theory and accounting research: An overview of some conceptual and empirical issues.” in Z. Hoque (ed.) “Methodological Issues in Accounting Research: Theories and Methods” London: Spiramus

Sy, A. and Tinker, T. (2005) ‘Archival research and the lost worlds of accounting’. Accounting History, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp.48 - 69.

Sy, A. and Tinker, T. (2011). From Mellmott to Madoff: history in the (re) making. Accounting Historians Journal, 38 (1): 141 - 158.

Tinker, T. (1988). Panglossian accounting theories: the science of apologising in style. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(2): 165-189.

Tinker, A. M., Merino, B. D. and Neimark, M. D.(1982). “The normative origins of positive theories: Ideology and accounting thought.” Accounting, Organizations and Society. 7(2):167-200.

Tinker, T. and Puxty, T. (1995). “Policing Accounting Knowledge: The Market for Excuses Affair.” Princeton, NY: Markus Weiner Publishers.

Tuttle, B., and J. Dillard. 2007. Beyond competition: Institutional isomorphism in the U.S. accounting research. Accounting Horizons 21 (4): 387–409.

Watts, R. L. (1977). Corporate financial statements, a product of the market and political processes. Australian Journal of Management, 2(1), 53-75.

Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1978). Positive accounting theory for the determination of accounting. The Accounting Review, 53(1), 112–134.

Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1979). The demand for and supply of accounting theories: the market for excuses. The Accounting Review, 54(2), 273–304.

Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1981). The markets for independence and independent auditors. Working Paper. Retrieved: file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/Watts_Zimmerman_MarketsIndp%20(3).pdf last access 11/25/2020.

Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1982). Auditors and the Determination of Accounting Standards. Working Paper. Retrieved: file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/Watts_Zimmerman_Audit&Account.pdf last access 11/25/2020.

Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1983). Agency problems, auditing, and the theory of the firm: Some evidence. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(3), 613-633.

Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive accounting theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1990). Positive accounting theory: A ten year perspective. The Accounting Review, 65(1), 131–156.

West, B. P. (2003). “Professionalism and Accounting Rules.” New York, NY: Routledge.

Whitley, R. 2000. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Science, 2nd ed., New York: Oxford University Press.

Williams, P. F., and J. Rodgers, J. 1995. The Accounting Review and the production of knowledge. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 6 (3): 263–287.

Williams, P. F. (1989). “The logic of positive accounting theory.” Accounting, Organizations and Society. 14(5/6):455-468.

Williams, P. F. (2001). “Who gets to speak and what must they say? A commentary on the Briloff affair,” Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 12 (2): 213-219.

Williams, P. F. (2003). “Modern accounting scholarship: The imperative of positive economics science.” Accounting Forum. September. 27(3):251-269

Williams, P. F. (2017), Jumping on the wrong bus: Reflections on a long, strange journey, Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 49: 76-85.

Whittington, G. (1987). Positive accounting: A review article. Accounting and Business Research, 17(68), 327-336.

Wolk, H. I. Dodd, J. L. and Tearney, M. G. (2004). “Accounting Theory: Conceptual Issues in A Political and Economic Environment. (6th ed.)” Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.

Yousof, A.M. (2006), Analyses and critique the foundation of positive theorization in accounting. Business Administration, 112, s. 26-35.

Zeff, S.A. (1989) Recent trends in accounting education and research in the USA: some implication for UK academics, The British Accounting Review, 21 (2), 159–176.

Zimmerman, J. (1989). ‘Improving a manuscript’s readability and likelihood of publication’. Issues in Accounting Education, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp.458 - 466.
Published
2021-09-27
Section
Articles