Monitoring For Good Governance in South Africa: The Complex of a Fair Public Administration

  • Mokoko Piet Sebola
Keywords: complex; good governance; monitoring; public governance; evaluation

Abstract

Post-apartheid South African government came up with stringent measures of ensuring the notion of good governance. This notion is to be achieved through a system that is fair and characterized by elements of transparency. The major purpose is to ensure that public resources are utilized to the benefit of the South African citizens, hence the delivery of services to the recipients. These measures exist in line with established state institutions to monitor compliance and efficiency of the government administration. As way of promoting such notion and strengthening good governance through performance of state Departments, the post-Mbeki administration introduced new government Departments as well as the establishment of the new unit in the Presidency called the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME). The unit has been in existence for some years now. State Departments and municipalities in the country continue to get qualified audit reports and adverse audit opinions from the Auditor- General of South Africa (AGSA). This is despite the existence of measures (accountability and ethical practices) and institutions of ensuring good governance and transparency in the country. This article investigates the roles of the South African institutions in monitoring good governance and the extent at which these institutions experience functional limitations to fulfill their constitutional mandate. The argument is that there are inconsistencies between the institutions of monitoring and the real complex public administration environment which involves the institutions, politicians, and public officials.

References

Ahmad, R. (2008). Governance, Social Accountability and the Civil Society. JOAAG, 3(1), pp. 10-20.
Brynard, P.A. (2007). Multiplicity in Public Policy Implementation. African Journal of Public Affairs, (1), pp. 34-39.
Carboni, N. (2010). Professional Autonomy versus Political Control: How to Deal with the Dilemma. Some Evidence from the Italian Core Executive. Public Policy and Administration, 25(4), pp. 365-372.
Cloete, F. & de Coning, C. (2014). Improving Public Policy, Theory, Practice and Results. 3rd Ed. Van Schaik Publishers: Pretoria.
Dlamini, P.C. & Migiro, S.O. (2016). Performance monitoring and evaluation systems in the South African local government. Journal of Public Administration, 51(3), pp. 376-390.
Epstein, R.A. (2008). Why the Modern African State is inconsistent with the rule of law. NYU Journal of Law and Liberty, 3, pp. 491-515.
Fukuyama, F. (2015). Why is democracy performing so poorly? Journal of Democracy, 26(1), pp. 11-20.
Global Monitoring Report, 2015/16. Monitoring and Improving Governance Subsystems: Bureaucratic Capability, Front-Line Provision, Checks and Balances.
Harpur, P. (2011). New Governance and the Role of Public and Private Monitoring of labour Conditions: Sweatshops and China Social Compliance for Textile and Apparel Industry. The Internet Journal of Rutgers School of Law, 38, pp. 2010-2011.
Hassen, T.H. (2015). Policy capacity building in the Ethiopian civil service. Unpublished Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of Doctor of Public Administration Degree at the University of South Africa. Pretoria: UNISA.
Ijeoma, E.O.C. (2011). Structural provisions for establishing and managing monitoring and evaluation units in government departments. Journal of Public Administration, 46(4), pp. 1288-1308.
International Federation of Accountants (2013). Good governance in the public sector – consultation draft for an international framework. The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy. http://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/Good-Governance-in-the-Public-Sector.pdf. 31 January 2017.
Jacobsen, D.I. (2006). The Relationship between Politics and Administration: The Importance of Contingency Factors, Formal Structure, Democracy, and Time. An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 19(2), pp. 303-323.
Madonsela, S. (2019). Critical Reflections on State Capture in South Africa. Insight on Africa, 11(1), pp. 113-130.
Kabonga, I. (2019). Principles and Practice of Monitoring and Evaluation: A Paraphernalia for Effective Development. Africanus: Journal of Development Studies, 48(2), pp. 1-11.
Madue, S.M. (2014). Finger-pointing and second-guessing: executive versus legislative oversight. Journal of Public Administration, 49 (3), pp. 860-875.
Mafunisa, M.J. & Sebola, M.P. (2014). Safegaurding ethics in the Public Sector. In Moeti K (ed). Public Finance Fundamentals. Juta: Pretoria.
Manyak, T.G. & Katono, I.W. (2010). Decentralization and conflict in Uganda: governance adrift. African Studies Quarterly, 11(4), pp. 1-24.
Mudzamba, M. & Sibanda, M. (2012). Monitoring customer-focused quality service delivery in local government: conceptual issues and perspectives for consideration. Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review (APSDPR), 1(1), pp. 1-20.
Mwangi, J.K.; Nyang’wara, B.M. & Kulet, J.L.O. (2015). Factors affecting the effectiveness of monitoring of constituency development fund projects in Kenya: a case of Laikipia West Constituency. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(1), pp. 74-87.
Ndou, S.D. (2016). State and civil society relations perspectives for good governance: propositions for the Africa agenda 2063 aspirations. Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives, 1(1), pp. 28-44.
Nkuna, N.W. & Sebola, M.P. (2012). Public Administration theoretical discourse in South Africa and the developmental local government: A need to go beyond modern thinking. Journal of Public Administration, 47(1), pp. 69-88.
Peters, B.G. & Pierre, J. (2012). The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration. SAGE Publications: London.
Sebola, M. (2009). Affirmative Action Policy: The Administrative Efficiency and Socio-Cultural Impact on the South African Society. Journal of Public Administration, 44(4), pp. 1102-1113.
Sebola, M.P. (2018). The South African Public Service and the Ethical Problematiques: The Discipline and the Practice Talking Different Tongues. African Journal of Public Affairs, 10(4), pp. 57-67.
Sebola, M.P. & Tsheola, J.P. (2020). Editorial Perspective: Public Administration, Governance, Democratic Societal Power Relations and Sustainability visions. Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives, 5(2), pp. 1-14.
Shaw, J. (2010). Revitalising the Politics-Administration Dichotomy: The Political Intrusion in the Democratic Governance in Taiwan.
Silima, T. (2016). Good governance and conflict resolution in Africa. Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives, 1(1), pp. 1-14.
Svara, J.H. (1985). Dichotomy and Duality Reconceptualizing the Relationship between Policy and Administration in Council-Manager Cities. North Carolina State University.
Tahmasebi, R. & Mahdi, S.M. (2011). Politics-Administration Dichotomy: A Century Debate.
Thornhill, C. (2006). The Domain of Public Administration. Journal of Public Administration, 41(4.1), pp. 793-806.
Van Vuuren, H. (2014). South Africa: democracy, corruption and conflict management. Democracy Works Conference Paper 2014. http://democracy.cde.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/democracy-works-south-africa-conference-paper-democracy-corruption-and-conflict-management-by-hennie-van-vuuren-pdf-.pdf. 30 January 2017.
Published
2021-10-26
Section
Articles