From Bureaucracy to Black Box: Revolutionizing Natural Justice and Due Process in Administrative Law

Authors

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Justicem, Due Process, Administrative Law, Algorithmic Decision-Making, Departmental Inquiries, Legal Frameworks

Abstract

Natural justice, rooted in English common law, embodies fairness in procedural justice and is foundational to Administrative law (Aslam, 2020). The growing use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) (Rosenberg, 2023) in administrative decision-making raises serious concerns about upholding fundamental legal principles like Natural Justice, derived from the Latin word “jus natural,” and is not codified, it is closely tied to common law (Mirani, 2022) and Due Process of law, first appeared as a substitute for Magna Carta’s “the law of the land” in a 1354 (Library of Congress, 2014) statute of King Edward III .Often described as “black boxes,” AI systems lack transparency, creating risks for fairness and accountability in decisions may impacting individuals’ rights. This study explores how AI-powered administrative systems can be designed to uphold these principles, ensuring just outcomes and legal transparency. The research critically examines the intersection of AI technology and administrative law, focusing on the opacity of AI’s decision-making processes. The goal is to identify strategies that ensure AI systems in administrative contexts not only align with Natural Justice (right to fair hearings and impartiality) and Due Process (right to a fair procedure) but also maintain public trust in the legal system. Using a qualitative research approach, the study employs doctrinal legal analysis and case studies to review AI frameworks in areas such as departmental inquiries and appeal in departmental inquiries. The analysis compares AI implementations across various jurisdictions, identifying gaps in transparency and accountability. Key findings indicate that without explainability, oversight, and human intervention, AI systems may breach legal principles. The study suggests solutions like Explainable AI (XAI), human-in-the-loop systems, and robust accountability frameworks to align AI with legal safeguards. While AI offers efficiency in administrative decision-making, adherence to fairness and justice principles is critical. The research supports a balanced approach where AI complements, rather than replaces, human decision-making, preserving Natural Justice and Due Process in an automated legal landscape.

Author Biography

Junaid Sattar Butt, Advocate High Court, Member AJK BAR COUNCIL,  2nd Floor Old Courts Plaza, Muzafarabad, Azad Kashmir, PAKISTAN

Junaid Sattar Butt is a legal and research professional with extensive expertise in international and comparative law, digitalization, human rights, and sustainability. Currently an Advocate at the High Court under the AJK Bar Council, Mr. Butt has over four years of experience in legal research, court assistance, and legal research. His academic background includes an LL.M. from the University of Lahore, specializing in International & Comparative Laws, Bachelor of Laws, specializing in Local & International Laws, with an M.A. in Political Science from the University of the Punjab and MBA Finance from Virtual University of Pakistan, specializing in economy, banking & financial regulations. Mr. Butt’s research interests encompass digital transformation in administrative processes, AI and governance, human rights protection, international arbitration, EU Laws, GDPR, Technology Laws and sustainability governance. He has published extensively on these topics, including comparative studies of GDPR and EU AI Act regulations, the role of AI in public administration, and digital currencies' regulatory frameworks. He is also dedicated to advancing human rights through research on international standards such as the Nelson Mandela Rules and comparative analyses of prisoner treatment. Through his work, Mr. Butt seeks to contribute to developing equitable governance structures that promote economic justice and uphold human rights.

References

*** (2005). May v. Ferndale Institution, case number 30083, report [2005] 3 S.C.R. 809, neutral citation 2005 SCC 82. Supreme Court of Canada. Retrieved from https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/2265/index.do, date: November 11, 2024.

*** (2013). The Wednesbury Principle. LawTeacher. Retrieved from https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/constitutional-law/scope-of-the-wednesbury-principle-constitutional-law-essay.php?vref=1, date: September 13, 2024.

*** (2013, November 21). Bonham’s Case. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/event/Bonhams-Case, date: September 03, 2024.

*** (2014). Magna Carta: Muse and Mentor - Due Process of Law. Library of Congress. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/magna-carta-muse-and-mentor/due-process-of-law.html#:~:text=The%20phrase%20%E2%80%9Cdue%20process%20of,the%20liberty%20of%20the%20subject, date: September 03, 2024.

*** (2014). Magna Carta: Muse and Mentor - Due Process of Law. Library of Congress. Retrieved September 03, 2024, from https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/magna-carta-muse-and-mentor/due-process-of-law.html#:~:text=The%20phrase%20%E2%80%9Cdue%20process%20of,the%20liberty%20of%20the%20subject, date: September 03, 2024.

*** (2017). Houston Federation of Teachers v. Houston Independent School District, Civil action H-14-1189. Casetext, part of Thomson Reuters. Retrieved from https://casetext.com/case/hous-fedn-of-teachers-v-hous-indep-sch-dist, date: November 11, 2024.

*** (2017). State v. Loomis: Wisconsin Supreme Court requires warning before use of algorithmic risk assessments in sentencing. Harvard Law Review, 130(5). Retrieved from https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-130/state-v-loomis/, date: November 11, 2024.

*** (2018, April 6). Slaughterhouse Cases. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/event/Slaughterhouse-Cases, date: September 03, 2024.

*** (2022). 17-10657 - Cahoo et al. v. SAS Analytics Inc. et al. GovInfo. Retrieved from https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-mied-2_17-cv-10657/summary, date: November 11, 2024.

*** (2022). Substantive due process. Scholarly Community Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/31494, date: November 11, 2024.

*** (2023). Muhammad Iqbal v. Zayad, Civil Appeal No. 11 of 2023. Retrieved from https://courtingthelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/DOC-20230413-WA0052..pdf, date: November 12, 2024.

*** (2023). Sterling v. Feek, No. 3:22-cv-05250. Casetext, part of Thomson Reuters. Retrieved from https://casetext.com/case/sterling-v-feek-2/, date: November 11, 2024.

*** (2024). Canadian administrative law - The prerogative writs, WET 219 - Applied water law. Okanagan College Library. Retrieved from https://libguides.okanagan.bc.ca/c.php?g=708598&p=5234363, date: September 30, 2024.

*** (2024). Due process. Cornell Law School. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/due_process#:~:text=The%20Fifth%20Amendment%20says%20to,legal%20obligation%20of%20all%20states, date: September 03, 2024.

*** (2024, August 26). AI in the courtroom: Colombian Constitutional Court’s landmark ruling cites UNESCO’s AI tools. UNESCO. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-courtroom-colombian-constitutional-courts-landmark-ruling-cites-unescos-ai-tools, date: November 12, 2024.

*** (2024, October 18). Miranda v. Arizona. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/event/Miranda-v-Arizona, date: September 03, 2024.

Al-Ansi, A. M. & Al-Ansi, A. (2023). An overview of artificial intelligence (AI) in 6G: Types, advantages, challenges and recent applications. Buletin Ilmiah Sarjana Teknik Elektro, 5(1), 67-75. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368364309_An_Overview_of_Artificial_Intelligence_AI_in_6G_Types_Advantages_Challenges_and_Recent_Applications, date: September 23, 2024.

Ashburner, H. (2022). The relevance of procedural fairness and practical injustice to materiality as an element of jurisdictional error. AIAL Forum, 104. Retrieved from https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AIAdminLawF/2022/5.pdf, date: September 13, 2024.

Aslam, M. A. (2020). Principles of Natural Justice in the Light of Administrative Law. Legal Service India. Retrieved from https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-1659-principles-of-natural-justice-in-the-light-of-administrative-law.html, date: September 01, 2024.

Bansal, A. K. (2021, Sep 27). The Rule of Natural Justice. Retrieved from https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/administrative-law/the-rule-of-natural-justice-administrative-law-essay.php?vref=1, date: September 12, 2024.

Bose, A. (2020, May 13). Principle of Natural Justice: Reasoned Decision. LexLife India. Retrieved from https://lexlife.in/2020/05/13/principle-of-natural-justice-reasoned-decision/, date: September 07, 2024.

Butt, J. (2023a). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the Efficiency of Administrative Decision Making Including Ethical & Legal Considerations and Comparative Study about Countries Already Incorporated AI for Administrative Decisions. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, 19(3), 7-25. Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDJ/article/view/2560, date: September 20, 2024.

Butt, J. (2023b). The Role of Bureaucracy in Europe for Promoting Democracy, Equality, Good Governance and Social Justice. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Administratio, 15(1), 7-20. Retrieved September 20, 2024, from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDA/article/view/2585, date: September 20, 2024.

Butt, J. S. (2024a). The impact of digitalization (AI) on administrative decision-making processes and access to justice– A Nordic perspective. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, 20(1), 22-42. Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDJ/article/view/2712, date: September 23, 2024.

Butt, J. S. (2024b). Data, privacy, and the law: Safeguarding rights in the new millennium. EIRP Proceedings, 19(1). Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDJ/article/view/2712, date: September 23, 2024.

Carelli, D. & Peters, B. G. (2024). Autonomy by Decree: How Administrative Law Shapes Bureaucratic Autonomy in Four Administrative Traditions. Administration & Society, 56(5), 683-703.

Cowan, J. G., Kuttner, T. S., Parrott, Z., & McIntosh, A. (2020, October 30). Administrative Law in Canada. The Canadian Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/administrative-law, date: September 05, 2024.

Daly, P. (2024, April 19). Responsive reasons in administrative law: The traditional position. Administrative Law Matters. Retrieved from https://www.administrativelawmatters.com/blog/2024/04/19/responsive-reasons-in-administrative-law-the-traditional-position/, date: September 03, 2024.

Desai, K. R. & Chakraborty, S. (2021). Understanding the principles of natural justice. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 8(7), 466-491. Retrieved from https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2107691.pdf, date: September 12, 2024.

Dissanayake, A. & Goonesinghe, S. (2021). Principles of natural justice, their relevance and importance to doctors. Ceylon Medical Journal, 66(2), 59-62.

Garg, K. (2021, July 22). Ensuring fairness in administrative action. Law School Policy Review. Retrieved from https://lawschoolpolicyreview.com/2021/07/22/ensuring-fairness-in-administrative-action/, date: September 13, 2024.

Garg, P. (2020). Principles of Natural Justice: Administrative Law. Scribd. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/474687871/Administrative-law, date: September 05, 2024.

Hughes, O. E. (1998). The Traditional Model of Public Administration. Public Management and Administration. London: Palgrave.

Kingsbury, B. (2009). The Concept of “Law” in Global Administrative Law. European Journal of International Law, 20(1), 23-57.

Li, D. G. (2022). Due process in removal proceedings after Thuraissigiam. Stanford Law Review, 74, 793-824. Retrieved from https://review.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2022/04/Li-74-Stan.-L.-Rev.-793.pdf, date: November 11, 2024.

Maheshwari, P. (2020, June 6). Natural Justice in Departmental Inquiry. SSRN. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3620940, date: September 05, 2024.

Mensah, R. O. (2022). The relevance of natural justice in the decision-making processes of public bodies and officials in Ghana. International Journal of Law and Society, 5(4), 371-377.

Metych, M. (2024, September 28). Miranda warning. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Miranda-warning, date: October 01, 2024.

Mirani, S. (2022, December 1). Natural Justice. Manupatra. Retrieved from https://articles.manupatra.com/article-details/Natural-Justice, date: September 01, 2024.

Mirani, S. (2022, December 1). Natural justice. Manupatra. Retrieved from https://articles.manupatra.com/article-details/Natural-Justice, date: September 14, 2024.

Munir, B., Mahmood, A. K., & Sohail, M. (2020). Principles of Administrative Discretion: A Case Study of Pakistan. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 4(III), 1023-1035. Retrieved from https://pssr.org.pk/issues/v4/3/principles-of-administrative-discretion-a-case-study-of-pakistan.pdf, date: September 05, 2024.

Pradhan, P. K., Raj, S., Satapathy, S., & Agrawal, S. (2024). Judicial review of administrative actions: An in-depth analysis of flaws in Indian administrative law. International Journal of Advanced Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 10(1), 727-743. Retrieved from https://ijariie.com/AdminUploadPdf/Judicial_Review_of_Administrative_Actions__An_In_depth_Analysis_of_Flaws_in_Indian_Administrative_Law_ijariie22467.pdf, date: September 30, 2024.

Rosenberg, S. (2023, November 23). All the AI terms you need to know. Axios. Retrieved from https://www.axios.com/2023/11/23/ai-artificial-intelligence-terms-definitions-list, date: September 01, 2024.

Sethi, H. (2021, July 6). International norms on fair hearing: The case of US, UK and India. Modern Diplomacy. Retrieved from https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2021/07/06/international-norms-on-fair-hearing-the-case-of-us-uk-and-india/, date: November 01, 2024.

Sharma, A. (2020, June 19). An overview of principle of natural justice in context to administrative law. YLCube. Retrieved from https://ylcube.com/c/blogs/overview-principle-natural-justice-context-administrative-law/, date: September 05, 2024.

Smentkowski, B. P. (2024, October 29). Thurgood Marshall. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/biography/Thurgood-Marshall, date: November 01, 2024.

Suksi, M. (2020, May 22). Administrative due process when using automated decision-making in public administration. Artificial Intelligence and Law.

Suksi, M. (2021). Administrative due process when using automated decision-making in public administration: some notes from a Finnish perspective. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 29, 87-110.

Wolswinkel, J. (2022). Artificial intelligence and administrative law. Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/documents/22298481/0/CDCJ%282022%2931E+-+FINAL+6.pdf/4cb20e4b-3da9-d4d4-2da0-65c11cd16116?t=1670943260563, date: September 20, 2024.

Zuckerman, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence in the administration of justice. In A. Higgins (Ed.), The civil procedure rules at 20. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-20

How to Cite

Butt, J. S. (2024). From Bureaucracy to Black Box: Revolutionizing Natural Justice and Due Process in Administrative Law. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Administratio, 16(1), 7–47. Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDA/article/view/3120

Issue

Section

Articles