Procedural Aspects and Effects of Termination of Criminal Proceedings

Authors

  • Artur Airapetean University of European Studies of Moldova

Keywords:

termination of criminal proceedings; removal from criminal prosecution; termination order; appeal period; judicial review

Abstract

This analysis addresses the mechanism for completing criminal prosecution through the order to cease or remove from prosecution, a procedural act that must meet strict motivation conditions according to Art. 285 of the CPP RM. The procedure for issuing this act involves a rigorous verification of the legal grounds, ensuring the transition from the investigation phase to the extinguishing phase of the criminal action under hierarchical and judicial control. The main effect of the cessation of the process is the extinguishing one, which enshrines the principle of ne bis in idem and prevents a new prosecution for the same act, thus guaranteeing the security of legal relations. At the same time, the order produces immediate effects on the coercive measures, imposing the revocation of all preventive and precautionary restrictions previously applied. From a rehabilitative perspective, removal from criminal prosecution on grounds that exclude guilt offers the person the legitimate right to repair the damage caused by the judicial error. In conclusion, procedural rigor in issuing these solutions is essential to prevent arbitrariness and to ensure real access to justice through the right to appeal provided for in Art. 313 of the CPC RM.

Author Biography

Artur Airapetean, University of European Studies of Moldova

Associate Professor, PhD

References

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova, Decision no. 11 of 25 March 2021 for the review of the constitutionality of some provisions of Art. 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Moldova.

Corneliu Bîrsan, European Convention on Human Rights. Commentary on Articles, Ed. C.H. Beck, 2010 (on the right to an effective remedy against dismissal decisions).

Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Moldova: No. 122-XV of March 14, 2003. In: Official Gazette of the Republic of Moldova, 2003, No. 104-110/447, pp. 4-208.

ECHR case law, Beian v. Romania case (no. 1), on the importance of unifying judicial practice for legal certainty.

ECHR case law, Guja v. Moldova case, on the need for predictability of criminal procedure rules.

ECHR case law, Okkali v. Turkey case (Application no. 52067/99), Judgment of 17 October 2006. (Establishes that excessive leniency and lack of rigor in the application of sanctions violate the positive obligations of the state).

ECHR jurisprudence, Zolotukhin v. Russia (application no. 14939/03), concerning the principle of ne bis in idem in the case of final decisions to terminate.

Gheorghe Mateuț, Criminal Procedure. General Part, Ed. Universul Juridic, Bucharest, 2019.

Igor Dolea, Criminal Procedural Law, Ed. Cartier, Chișinău, 2016.

Nicolae Volonciu, Treaty on Criminal Procedure, Paideia Publishing House, Bucharest (on the fate of precautionary measures after the end of the trial).

Published

2025-12-19

How to Cite

Airapetean, A. (2025). Procedural Aspects and Effects of Termination of Criminal Proceedings. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Administratio, 17(1). Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDA/article/view/3886

Issue

Section

Articles