Assessments on the Conditions of Persons Who have the Legal Right to Caretaking
Abstract
The legal maintenance obligation is one of the "well established" institutions in family law, in addition to the vast regulation, it also enjoys a multitude of opinions formulated by the doctrine and the courts, national and not only. However, it cannot be ignored that certain aspects are not fully clarified: the criteria for determining the state of need of the creditor of the maintenance obligation, the delimitation between this and the state of strict necessity, the meaning of the phrase "continuing studies" by the child who has become an adult, the meaning of the notion of the creditor's assets from which he can support himself and, last but not least, the delimitation between the creditor's inability to support himself from his work and the existence of a state of need as a result of his fault. In our analysis, we started from the provisions of the current Civil Code, trying to suggest solutions for the issues raised, with the help of established doctrine and decisions and rulings from judicial practice, some even before the entry into force of the indicated normative act.
References
Bîrsan, C. (2013). Drept civil. Drepturile reale principale/ Civil law. The main real rights. Bucharest: Hamangiu.
Bodoaşcă, T., Drăghici, A. & Puie, I. (2012). Dreptul familiei/Family law. Bucharest: Universul Juridic.
Hageanu, C.C. (2012). Dreptul familiei şi actele de stare civilă/Family law and civil status documents. Bucharest: Hamangiu.
Costache, M. (2017). Few Considerations on the Maintenance Obligation in the Romanian Civil Law. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, 2, pp. 136-146.
Drăghici, A. & Duminică, R. (2014). Obligația legală de întreținere/ Legal caretaking obligation. Bucharest: Universul Juridic
Filipescu, I.P. & Filipescu A. I. (2006). Tratat de dreptul familiei/ Treaty on family law. Bucharest: Universul Juridic.
Florian, E. (2018). Dreptul familiei. Căsătoria. Regimuri matrimoniale. Filiația/ Family law. The marriage. Matrimonial regimes. Parentage. Bucharest: C.H. Beck.
Lupaşcu, D. & Crăciunescu, C.M. (2012). Dreptul familiei/Family Law. Bucharest: Universul Juridic.
Stoica, V. (2013). Drept civil. Drepturile reale principale/ Civil law. The main real rights. Bucharest: C.H. Beck.
***(1997). Hotărârea Mellacher c. Austriei, în Jurisprudenţa Curţii Europene a Drepturilor Omului/ The judgment of Mellacher v. Austria, in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, by V. Berger, Bucharest: Editura Institutului Român pentru Drepturile Omului, pp. 499-501.
Hotărârea Muller v. Austria din 16 decembrie 1974/ The judgment of Mellacher v. Austria of 15 December, Decisions et rapports de Commission europeenne des droits de l’homme/ Decisions and reports of the European Commission of Human Rights nr. 1, Strasbourg, p. 46.
Hotărârea Pressos Compania Naviera şi alţii c. Belgiei din 20 noiembrie 1995/Judgment Pressos Compania Naviera and others v. Belgium of November 20, 1995, in Publications de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme. Série A. Arrêts et décisions/ Publications of the European Court of Human Rights. Series A. Judgments and decisions, nr. 332, parag. 31.
Decizia Comisiei pentru Drepturile Omului din 27 februarie 1995 în cauza Dello Preite c. Italiei/ Decision of the Human Rights Commission of 27 February 1995 in the case of Dello Preite v. Italy, in Decisions et rapports de Commission europeenne des droits de l’homme nr. 80, Strasbourg, p. 14
Decizia Comisiei pentru Drepturile Omului din 9 septembrie 1998 în cauza Lenzing AG c. Marii Britanii/ Decision of the Commission on Human Rights of 9 September 1998 in the case of Lenzing AG v. Great Britain, Decisions et rapports de Commission europeenne des droits de l’homme nr. 81, Strasbourg/ Decisions and reports of the European Commission of Human Rights nr. 81, Strasbourg, p.123.
High Court of Cassation and Justice, civil section, decision no. 3799/2004, available at https://legeaz.net/spete-civil-iccj-2004/decizia-3799-2004.
The Supreme Court, civil section, decision no. 859/1958, în Culegere de decizii ale Tribunalului Suprem pe anul 1958/ Collection of decisions of the Supreme Court for the year 1958. (1959). Bucharest: Editura Științifică, p. 216.
Bucharest Court of Appeal, 4th civil section, decision no. 2073/2000, in D. Tiţian, A. Constantin, Cîrstea, M. (2008). Codul familiei adnotat/ Annotated family code, Bucharest: Hamangiu, p. 284.
Iași Court, civil section 1, decision no. 189/2015, available at https://www.avocatura.com/speta/25824/pensie-intretinere-tribunalul-iasi.html#ixzz6tz19De42.
Hunedoara County Court, civil decision no. 169/1980, in Revista română de drept/Romanian Law Journal nr. 9/1980, p. 59.
Maramureș Court, decision no. 339/A/2019, available at https://www.jurisprudenta.com/jurisprudenta/speta-15f6yj6m/.
Maramureș Court, decision no. 425/A/2019, available at https://www.jurisprudenta.com/jurisprudenta/speta-15n9kg7f/.
Galati Court, civil sentence no. 4590/2018, available at https://www.jurisprudenta.com/jurisprudenta/speta-165nb7xl/.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Alina-Elena Iliescu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The author fully assumes the content originality and the holograph signature makes him responsible in case of trial.
