A Review of the Right to Freedom and Safety. Understanding the Reasonable Suspicion
Keywords:
legislation, jurisprudence, deprivation of liberty, arrest warrantAbstract
The most common violations found by the Court were those associated with the violation
of Article 5, paragraph 3, namely a lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention during the
criminal proceedings. Another problem that arises in the cases against Moldova detention without
reasonable suspicion. The existence of a reasonable suspicion that the person committed the crime
stipulated in the criminal law is a „sine qua non” of her arrest and detention.
References
Grosu, V. et. alli. (2014). Studiu de compatibilitate. Cod de procedură penală al Republicii Moldova.
Arest şi măsurile preventive şi privative de libertate. Compatibilitatea cu prevederile articolului 5 din
Convenţia Europeană a drepturilor omului şi jurisprudenţa relevantă a Curţii Europene a
Drepturilor Omului/Compatibility study. Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Moldova.
Arrest and preventive and custodial measures. Compatibility with the provisions of Article 5 of the
European Convention on Human Rights and the relevant case law of the European Court of Human
Rights. Chişinău: Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Moldova.
Rotaru, V. (2012). Societatea şi justiţia penală. Ghid pentru jurnalişti şi activiştii din domeniul
drepturilor omului/ Society and criminal justice. A guide for journalists and human rights activists.
Chişinău: Ed. Cartier.
Macovei, M. (2003). Libertatea şi siguranţa persoanei. Ghid privind punerea în aplicare a articolului
5 al Convenţiei Europene pentru Drepturile Omului/ Freedom and security of the person. Guide on
the implementation of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Bucharest: R.M.
Dreptmd.Web page. Retrieved from https://dreptmd.wordpress.com/legalitatea-arestarii-preventivein-
jurisprudenta-cedo/.
Arest şi măsurile preventive şi privative de libertate. Compatibilitatea cu prevederile articolului 5 din
Convenţia Europeană a drepturilor omului şi jurisprudenţa relevantă a Curţii Europene a
Drepturilor Omului/Compatibility study. Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Moldova.
Arrest and preventive and custodial measures. Compatibility with the provisions of Article 5 of the
European Convention on Human Rights and the relevant case law of the European Court of Human
Rights. Chişinău: Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Moldova.
Rotaru, V. (2012). Societatea şi justiţia penală. Ghid pentru jurnalişti şi activiştii din domeniul
drepturilor omului/ Society and criminal justice. A guide for journalists and human rights activists.
Chişinău: Ed. Cartier.
Macovei, M. (2003). Libertatea şi siguranţa persoanei. Ghid privind punerea în aplicare a articolului
5 al Convenţiei Europene pentru Drepturile Omului/ Freedom and security of the person. Guide on
the implementation of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Bucharest: R.M.
Dreptmd.Web page. Retrieved from https://dreptmd.wordpress.com/legalitatea-arestarii-preventivein-
jurisprudenta-cedo/.
Downloads
Published
2021-04-08
How to Cite
Pantea, A. (2021). A Review of the Right to Freedom and Safety. Understanding the Reasonable Suspicion: Array. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, 16(3). Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDJ/article/view/966
Issue
Section
Studies and Articles
License
The author fully assumes the content originality and the holograph signature makes him responsible in case of trial.
