Study On The Relationship Between Audit Quality Perception And Corporate Governance


  • Aura Oana Mustatea "Valahia" University from Targoviste
  • Carmen Mihaela Bulau "Valahia" University from Targoviste
  • Lucian Cosmin Badalau "Valahia" University from Targoviste


The purpose of this study is to assess how the different elements of the audit process contribute to corporate governance. The sample comprises 124 firms, chosen using convenience sampling. The respondents are risk management specialists and internal auditors. To analyze the data, a structural equation model is employed. The results demonstrate a direct and positive correlation between the components of the audit process and the perception of corporate governance quality. These findings underscore the importance for organizations to adopt diverse practices that effectively allocate resources to enhance the quality of the audit process.


Aldamen, H., Duncan, K., Kelly, S., McNamara, R. & Nagel, S. (2012). Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis. Accounting and Finance, vol. 52(4), pp. 971-1000.

Arena, M., Azzone, G. (2009). Identifying organizational drivers of internal audit effectiveness. International Journal of Auditing, vol. 13(1), pp. 43-60.

Association of Certified Chartered Accountants (ACCA, UK) (2015). Audit and Assurance: Specific considerations.

Carcello, J.V., Hermanson, D.R, Ye, Z. (2011). Corporate Governance Research in Accounting and Auditing: Insights, Practice Implications, and Future Research Directions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, vol. 30(3), pp. 1-31.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). L. Erlbaum Associates.

DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford University Press

Gartland, D. J. (2017). The importance of Audit Planning. Journal of Accountancy, September Issue.

Hair, J. F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Pearson.

IA CoP (2014). Risk Assessment in Audit Planning. A Guide for Auditors On How Best To assess risks when planning audit work.

IIA - Institute of Internal Auditors (2015). International Professional Practices Framework

Kaplan, S., Mauldin, E. (2008). Auditor-audit committee interactions prior to the filing of audited financial statements. Accounting Horizons, vol. 22(2), pp. 241-264.

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.

Knechel, W.R., Vanstraelen, A. (2007). The relationship between auditor tenure and audit quality implied by going concern opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, vol. 26(1), pp. 113-131.

Malaescu, I. Sutton, SG. (2015). The reliance of external auditors on internal audit's use of continuous audit. Journal of information systems, vol. 29 (1), pp. 95-114. American Accounting Association.

Nunnally, J. C., Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill

Smith, J. L. (2011). Investors' Perceptions of Audit Quality: Effects of Regulatory Change. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, vol. 31 (1), pp. 17-38, Available at SSRN:

Trotman, A. J. and K. R. Duncan. 2018. Internal audit quality: Insights from audit committee members, senior management, and internal auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, vol. 37(4), pp. 235-259.

Zakari, M. A. (2013). Does audit evidence type effects on quality of auditor’s opinion? Corporate Ownership and Control, vol. 11(1-2), pp. 96-106. DOI: 10.22495/cocv11i1conf2p1

Zhang, Y., Zhou, J., Zhou, N. (2007). Audit committee quality, auditor independence, and internal control weaknesses. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, vol. 26(3), pp. 300-327.



How to Cite

Mustatea, A. O., Bulau, C. M., & Badalau, L. C. (2024). Study On The Relationship Between Audit Quality Perception And Corporate Governance. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Œconomica, 20(2). Retrieved from



Business Administration and Business Economics