Regulation of Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Lilian Gumbo University of South Africa
  • Nicholaas Booyse University of South Africa

Keywords:

Risk based regulation; artificial intelligence ethics; innovation; machine learning

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to examine the different approaches used to regulate artificial intelligence through a systematic and bibliometric analysis of the literature.

Prior Work: Governments and industry concur that there is an urgent need for artificial intelligence (AI) regulation. The European Union, the United States of America and China have already pioneered in the regulation of AI with different regulatory approaches. However, there remains no clearly defined method of how AI can be regulated comprehensively.

Approach: A total of 38 articles published between 2019-2024 extracted from the Scopus and Clarivate Web of Science databases were selected for analysis following the PRISMA protocol. The review combined bibliometric and systematic review.

Results: The study established risk-based, management-based, rights-based, systemic market safety, tort liability, single unified law and ethics as major approaches used to regulate AI. Economic and political concerns remains barriers to effective regulation as governments and jurisdictions aim to become centers of innovation.

Implications: A universal and unified regulation of AI which extends from ethical standards enforced by professional bodies to actual enforceable law is required to avoid law lacunas.

Value: Major AI regulatory approaches were examined, and trends and gaps in the regulation of AI literature were identified.

References

Albakjaji, M. & Almarzouqi, R. (2024). The Dilemma of the Copyrights of Artificial Intelligence: The Case of Saudi Arabia Regulations. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development (IJSKD), 16(1), 1-15.

Brown, R. & Truby, J. (2022). Mending Lacunas in the EU’s GDPR and Proposed Artificial Intelligence Regulation. European Studies, 9(1), 61-90.

Chamberlain, J. (2023). The risk-based approach of the European Union’s proposed artificial intelligence regulation: Some comments from a tort law perspective. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 14(1), 1-13.

Chia, H. (2019). In machines we trust: Are robo-advisers more trustworthy than human financial advisers? Law, Technology and Humans, 1, 129-141.

Coglianese, C. & Crum, C. R. (2024). Taking Training Seriously: Human Guidance and Management-Based Regulation of Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/html/2402.08466v2.

Finocchiaro, G. (2024). The regulation of artificial intelligence. AI & SOCIETY, 39(4), 1961-1968.

Giansanti, D. (2022, September). The Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Digital Radiology in the scientific literature: a narrative review of reviews. Healthcare, 10(10), 1824).

Ibrahim, S. M., Alshraideh, M. A., Leiner, M., Aldajani, I. M., & Ouarda, B. (2024). Artificial intelligence ethics: ethical consideration and regulations from theory to practice. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 13(3), 3703-3714.

Kamewor, F. T., Kwateng, K. O., & Mensah, J. (2024). Green logistics practices: A bibliometric and systematic methodological review and future research opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 476.

Khisamova, Z. I., Begishev, I. R., & Gaifutdinov, R. R. (2019). On methods to legal regulation of artificial intelligence in the world. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9(1), 5159-5162.

Lee, J. (2020). Access to finance for artificial intelligence regulation in the financial services industry. European Business Organization Law Review, 21(4), 731-757.

Li, Y. (2023). Dilemmas and Breakthroughs in the Legal Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Based on Deep Learning Models. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1).

Lim, E., Park, H., & Kim, B. (2022, May). Review of the Validity and Rationality of Artificial Intelligence Regulation: Application of the EU’s AI Regulation Bill to Accidents Caused by Artificial Intelligence. The International FLAIRS Conference Proceedings, 35.

Lupo, G. (2023). Risky artificial intelligence: The role of incidents in the path to AI regulation. Law, Technology and Humans, 5(1), 133-152.

Meszaros, J., Minari, J., & Huys, I. (2022). The future regulation of artificial intelligence systems in healthcare services and medical research in the European Union. Frontiers in Genetics, 13.

Mishina, N. V., Shikula, I. R., & Afanasyeva, S. A. (2020). Features of legal regulation of artificial intelligence as a guarantee of sustainable development of society. E3S Web of Conferences, 208.

Park, H. & Kwon, H. Y. (2023, May). Analysis of Artificial Intelligence regulations for trustworthiness. The International FLAIRS Conference Proceedings, 36.

Paul, R. (2024). European artificial intelligence “trusted throughout the world”: Risk‐based regulation and the fashioning of a competitive common AI market. Regulation & Governance, 18(4), 1065-1082.

Pecchia, L., Maccaro, A., Matarrese, M. A., Folkvord, F., & Fico, G. (2024). Artificial Intelligence, data protection and medical device regulations: squaring the circle with a historical perspective in Europe. Health and Technology, 1-8.

Penteado, B. E., Fornazin, M., Castro, L., & Rachid, R. (2022, June). The Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: An Exploratory Study. Proceedings of the 2022 Computers and People Research Conference, 1-5.

Ploug, T. & Holm, S. (2023). The right to a second opinion on Artificial Intelligence diagnosis—Remedying the inadequacy of a risk‐based regulation. Bioethics, 37(3), 303-311.

Ruschemeier, H. (2023). AI as a challenge for legal regulation–the scope of application of the artificial intelligence act proposal. ERA Forum, 23, 361-376.

Schedl, M., Gómez, E., & Lex, E. (2022, July). Retrieval and recommendation systems at the crossroads of artificial intelligence, ethics, and regulation. Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 3420-3424.

Valenzuela-Fernández, L. A., Ocaña-Fernández, Y. J., Sánchez, M. A. F., Apaza, Y. C. L., Zubieta-Romero, E., & Uribe-Hernández, Y. C. (2023). Law and Artificial Intelligence: Possibilities and Regulations on the Road to the Consummation of the Digital Verdict. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(6), 1202.

Vasilevskaya, L. Y. & Poduzova, E. B. (2022). “Artificial Intelligence” Technologies in the Mechanism of Contractual Regulation in the Russian Federation. Kutafin Law Review, 9(2), 343-354.

Zoellick, J. C., Drexler, H., & Drexler, K. (2024). Artificial intelligence in melanoma diagnosis: Three scenarios, shifts in competencies, need for regulation, and reconciling dissent between humans and AI. TATuP-Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice, 33(1), 48-54.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-28

How to Cite

Gumbo, L., & Booyse, N. (2025). Regulation of Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Literature Review. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Œconomica, 21(1), 33–47. Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDOE/article/view/3190

Issue

Section

Articles