The Digitalisation of Integrated Reporting and Its Benefits for Corporate Governance: Evidence from Romania

Authors

  • Loredana Maria Clim (Moga) University of Craiova

Abstract

The acceleration of digitalization processes has generated significant transformations in corporate reporting practices and in the functioning of governance mechanisms. In this context, integrated reporting, supported by digital solutions, has become an increasingly frequent tool to improve the transparency and quality of information used in decision-making processes. This study analyses the relationship between the digitalization of integrated reporting and corporate governance within companies in Romania, with a focus on the role of organizational transparency in explaining this relationship. The research adopts a quantitative approach, based on data collected through a standardized questionnaire applied to a sample of 210 companies in Romania. The measurement instruments are built on scales validated in international literature, and the data analysis is performed through structural equation modeling, an appropriate method for investigating the complex relationships between the analysed variables. The results indicate the existence of a positive relationship between the digitalization of integrated reporting and organizational transparency, as well as a favourable influence on the quality of corporate governance. The analysis shows that organizational transparency is a middleman in the relationship between digitalization of integrated reporting and corporate governance. This means that digitalization has an effect on how information is combined and used in management processes. From a theoretical perspective, the study contributes to the literature on integrated reporting and corporate governance by clarifying the information mechanisms associated with digitalization in an emerging economy context. From a practical perspective, the results provide relevant benchmarks for managers and decision-makers interested in strengthening organizational transparency and accountability.

References

Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017, October). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: Establishing the framework conditions. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030–1051.

Barth, M. E., Cahan, S. F., Chen, L., & Venter, E. R. (2017, October). The economic consequences associated with integrated report quality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 62, 43–64.

Bushman, R. M., Piotroski, J. D., & Smith, A. J. (2004, May). What determines corporate transparency? Journal of Accounting Research, 42(2), 207–252.

Cokins, G., Oncioiu, I., Türkeș, M. C., Topor, D. I., Căpușneanu, S., Paștiu, C. A., Deliu, D., & Solovăstru, A. N. (2020, August). Intention to use accounting platforms in Romania: A quantitative study on sustainability and social influence. Sustainability, 12(15), 6127.

de Villiers, C., Rinaldi, L., & Unerman, J. (2014, September). Integrated reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1042–1067.

Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2010). One report: Integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy. Wiley.

Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2018). The Nordic model: An analysis of leading practices in ESG disclosure. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 30(1), 34–45.

Fornasari, T., & Traversi, M. (2024, January). The impact of the CSRD and the ESRS on non-financial disclosure. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, 1, 117–133.

Galera-Zarco, C. (2022). Unleashing the potential of digital twin in offering green services. IET Conference Proceedings, pp. 158–161.

Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001, September). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 405–440.

International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2013). The International Integrated Reporting Framework.

Morioka, S. N., & de Carvalho, M. M. (2016, November). A systematic literature review towards a conceptual framework for integrating sustainability performance into business. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 134–146.

Narula, R., Rao, P., Kumar, S., & Paltrinieri, A. (2024, March). ESG investing and firm performance: Retrospections of past and reflections of future. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32, 1096–1121.

Oncioiu, I., Popescu, D. M., Aviana, A. E., Șerban, A., Rotaru, F., Petrescu, M., & Marin-Pantelescu, A. (2020, September). The role of environmental, social, and governance disclosure in financial transparency. Sustainability, 12(17), 6757.

Oprean-Stan, C., Oncioiu, I., Iuga, I. C., & Stan, S. (2020, October). Impact of sustainability reporting and inadequate management of ESG factors on corporate performance and sustainable growth. Sustainability, 12(20), 8536.

Qian, C., Gao, X., & Tsang, A. (2015, September). Corporate philanthropy, ownership type and financial transparency. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 851–867.

Stubbs, W., & Higgins, C. (2014, September). Integrated reporting and internal mechanisms of change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1068–1089.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-27

How to Cite

Clim (Moga), L. M. (2026). The Digitalisation of Integrated Reporting and Its Benefits for Corporate Governance: Evidence from Romania. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Œconomica, 22(1), 25–41. Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDOE/article/view/3727

Issue

Section

Articles