Innovation in School Performance Assessment: The Digital Portfolio as a Tool for Enhancing Achievement and Success in Education
Keywords:
digital portfolios; school performance; assessment innovation; educational technology; student engagementAbstract
This article examines the impact of digital portfolios on school performance assessment, aiming to improve educational outcomes through innovative evaluation methods. As the demand for adaptable skills grows in a competitive job market, this research is crucial for developing assessment strategies that capture a comprehensive view of student competencies beyond traditional testing. Drawing on previous research that emphasizes the role of digital technologies in education (Prensky, 2001; Mishra & Koehler, 2006) and the need for assessments aligned with learning objectives (Wiggins, 1998), this study focuses on digital portfolios as a tool for comprehensive evaluation. A mixed-methods approach was used, combining qualitative analyses of digital portfolio use with quantitative data on student performance. Methods included case studies, educator surveys, and student interviews. The study found that digital portfolios enhance student outcomes by providing a more detailed skills assessment, promoting self-directed learning, and increasing engagement. They offer flexibility for personalized evaluation and continuous feedback, which leads to improved academic performance and motivation. This research demonstrates the effectiveness of digital portfolios in providing a holistic view of student learning and suggests their potential to transform educational assessment to better meet the evolving needs of students in a digital era.
References
*** (2004). Education for All: The Dakar Framework for Action. UNESCO.
Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J.-C. (1977). Reproduction: Studies in sociology of education. Sage.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage.
Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. Basic Books.
Brookhart, S. M. (2017). How to give effective feedback to your students. ASCD.
Coleman, J. S. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. US Government Printing Office.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology,
(Supplement), S95-S120.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
Feinstein, L. (2003). Inequality in education and social mobility. Sociology, Vol. 37(3), pp. 453-473.
Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J. U. (1986). Black students’ school success: Coping with the burden of acting
white. Urban Review, Vol. 18(3), pp. 176-206.
Hallam, S. (2010). The psychology of classroom learning: Students’ perspectives. Sage.
Halpern, D. F. (2012). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Psychology Press.
Hanushek, E. A. & Woessmann, L. (2008). The role of school quality in economic growth. In Hanushek,
E. A., & Woessmann, L. (Eds.), Education productivity: A review of the evidence, pp. 3-47. Stanford
University Press.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement.
Routledge.
Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for
teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, Vol. 108(6), pp. 1017-1054.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon, Vol. 9(5), pp. 1-6.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon &
Schuster.
Stiggins, R. J. (2001). Student-involved assessment for learning. Prentice Hall.
Wiggins, G. P. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student
performance. Jossey-Bass.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-regulated learning: The nature of self-regulated learning and the
effective teaching of self-regulated learning strategies. In Zimmerman B. J. & Schunk D. H. (Eds.),
Self-regulated learning and academic achievement, pp. 1-14. Springer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Didactica Danubiensis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
