Pedagogical Action Research as a Framework for Linguistic and Intercultural Innovation in University Education
Keywords:
pedagogical action research; linguistic and intercultural innovation; higher education; reflective teaching; axiological reflectionAbstract
The paper examines pedagogical action research as a methodological and conceptual framework for fostering linguistic and intercultural innovation in higher education. In the context of increasing cultural diversity and the globalization of academic environments, action research enables educators to systematically reflect on their teaching practices, adapt pedagogical strategies, and respond to learners’ diverse linguistic, cultural, and axiological needs. The study highlights how iterative cycles of planning, action, observation, and reflection support the development of communicative and intercultural competences, learner autonomy, and reflective engagement in academic learning contexts. Emphasis is placed on the integration of collaborative learning, guided reflection, and context-sensitive pedagogical interventions that promote meaningful academic interaction in intercultural settings. The paper argues that pedagogical action research contributes to bridging theory and practice by empowering educators as reflective practitioners and learners as active participants in the educational process. The conclusions underscore the value of action research in enhancing the quality of higher education and in cultivating an inclusive academic culture that supports intercultural dialogue and value-oriented learning within university environments.
References
Antoci, D. (2025a). The value dimension of educational language: From theory to practice. In L. Șoitu & G. Haja (Eds.), Language of education: Proceedings of the Conference “Dialogues on Education” (2nd ed.) (pp. 117–122). Iași: Editura Universității „Al. I. Cuza”.
Antoci, D. (2025b). Shaping value orientations through the fusion of technology and pedagogical action research. Didactica Danubiensis, 5(1), 225–235.
Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00463.x
Byram, M. (2000). Assessing intercultural competence in language teaching. Sprogforum, 18, 8–13.
Council of Europe. (2018). Reference framework of competences for democratic culture. Council of Europe.
Cucoș, C. (2000). Educația: Dimensiuni culturale și interculturale [Education: Cultural and intercultural dimensions]. Iași: Polirom.
Dimitriu, A., & Antoci, D. (2025). English for employability: Pragmatic communication skills in vocational education and training. Analele Universității din Craiova, Seria Psihologie-Pedagogie, 47(1), 358–372. https://doi.org/10.52846/AUCPP.2025.1.27
Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Bristol: Open University Press.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Didactica Danubiensis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
