Mediation as a “Negotiated Justice”

Authors

  • Mariana-Alina Stefanoaia College of Legal Advisers Suceava

Keywords:

mediation; negotiation; resolution; voluntary procedure

Abstract

Mediation is a structured process, in which a neutral and impartial third party, who has no
decision-making power regarding the resulting solution, assists the parties in finding their own solutions
to resolve the dispute. Mediation is based on the trust that the parties place in the mediator, as a person
capable of facilitating negotiations between them and supporting them in resolving the conflict, by
obtaining a mutually convenient, efficient and sustainable solution. The classical resolution of the
conflict by referring it to the judicial authorities (police, prosecutor's office, justice) often does not
satisfy the interests of the parties, because it is a solution based on the winner-loser concept. Instead,
resolving the conflict through mediation is the fruit of the meeting of the will of the parties. No one
comes to impose their solution, therefore, the parties are the only ones in a position to decide. The role
of the mediator is to facilitate the creation of a communication corridor between the parties, through
which they can become aware of the best solution to the conflict between them. The mediation activity
is performed equally for all persons, regardless of race, color, nationality, ethnic origin, language,
religion, sex, opinion, political affiliation, wealth or social origin. The parties, individuals or legal
entities, can resort to mediation without appealing to the judicial or arbitral bodies that will be relieved
of numerous cases having as their object the settlement of misunderstandings between the parties. In
conclusion, mediation, in a complex society and with different types of conflicts, represents the way
outside the judicial system to the efficient, cheap and fast resolution of disputes.

Author Biography

Mariana-Alina Stefanoaia, College of Legal Advisers Suceava

Legal adviser

References

Arnold, J. A. (2000). Mediator insight: Disputants' perceptions of third parties knowledge and its effects

on mediated negotiation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11, 4.

Arnold, J.A. & O'Conner, K. M. (1999). Ombudspersons or peer? The effect of third-party expertise

and recommendations on negotiations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 5.

Baruch Bush, R. A. & Ganong Pope, S. (2004). Transformative Mediation. Changing the Quality of

Family Conflict Interaction, in Jay Folberg, Ann L. Milne, Peter Salem (eds.). Divorce and Family

Mediation. Models, Techniques, and Applications. New York, London: The Guilford Press.

Boncu, Șt. (2006). Negotiation and Mediation. Psychological Perspectives. Iasi: European Institute,.

Bush Baruch, R. A. & Folger, J. P. (2005). The Promise of Mediation: The transformative approach to

conflict. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Carnevale, P.J. & Conlon, D.E. (1988). Time pressure and strategic choice in mediation. Organizational

Behavior and Human Decisions Processes, 42.

Carnevale, P.J. & Pegnetter, R. (1985). The selection of mediation tactics in public-sector disputes: A

contigency analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 41.

Conlon, D.E. & Fasolo, P.M. (1990). Influence of speed of third-party intervention and outcome on

negotiator and constituent fairness judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 13, 4.

Cremin, H. (2007). Peer Mediation. Berkshire: Open University Press.

Dipankar, S. (2005). Information Society as if Communication mattered: The Indian state revisited, in

Bernard Bel, Jan Brouwer, Biswajit Das, Vibodh Parthasarathi, Guy Poitevin (ed.). Communication

Processes, vol. 1 - Media and Mediation. London: Sage, New Delhi, Thousand Oaks.

Grossberg, L., Wartella, E. & Whitney D.C. (1998). Media Making: Mass Media in a Popular Culture.

Sage: Thousand Oaks.

Guillaume-Hofnung, M. (1995). La Médiation, “Que sais-je?”/Mediation. What do I know?. 4e édition,

Paris: PUF.

Lande, J. (2000). Toward more sophisticated mediation theory. Journal of Dispute Resolution, no. 2.

Mayer, B. (2004). Facilitative Mediation, in Jay Folberg, Ann L. Milne, Peter Salem (eds.). Divorce

and Family Mediation. Models, Techniques, and Applications. New York, London: The Guilford Press.

Meierding, N. R. (2004). Managing the Communication Process in Mediation, in Jay Folberg, Ann L.

Milne, Peter Salem (eds.), Divorce and Family Mediation. Models, Techniques, and Applications, New

York, London: The Guilford Press.

Moore, C.M. (1994), Why do we mediate?, in J. P. Folger, T. S. Jones (eds.). New directions in

mediation: Communication research and perspectives. California: Sage.

Randolph Lowry, L. (2004). Evaluative Mediation, in Jay Folberg, Ann L. Milne, Peter Salem (eds.),

Divorce and Family Mediation. Models, Techniques, and Applications. New York, London: The

Guilford Press.

Richbell, D. (2008). Mediation of Construction Disputes. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Risckin, L. L. (1996). Understanding mediators' orientations, strategies and techniques: A grid for the

perplexed. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, no. 1.

Riskin, L. (1994). Mediator orientations, strategies, techniques. Alternatives, no. 12.

Thompson, L. & Kim, P. H. (2000). How the quality of third parties' settlement solutions is affected by

the relationship between negotiators. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 1.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-09

How to Cite

Stefanoaia, M.-A. (2023). Mediation as a “Negotiated Justice”. Journal of Danubian Studies and Research, 12(1). Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/JDSR/article/view/2147

Issue

Section

Danubian Economy and Legislation