The Multifunctional Content of the Human Right to the Environment

Authors

  • Mihaela Aghenitei Dunarea de Jos University of Galati

Abstract

If the protection of the environment inevitably entails the attainment of fundamental freedoms, such as, for example, the right to property or the restriction of certain easements or the restriction of the right to move in certain protected areas, it ends up, as we have shown, to broaden other concerns. The right to the environment was initially closely linked to the right to health and the right to life; this later translated into the assertion of a right to better living and working conditions such as occupational health and safety and the development of the right to rest and recreation. But environmental law is the bearer of fundamental rights, such as the right to information and participation, decision-making, the right to association, and, thus, the strengthening of the social and collective function of existing rights. Law is the mass of duties both for the state and public authorities and for the individual. Environmental protection may be the reason for the increased participation of citizens in public life and the democratization of all procedures.

References

Antoniu, George (2004). Noul Cod penal, Codul penal anterior/ The new Criminal Code, the previous Criminal Code. Bucharest: All Beck.

Caballero, M. (2005). Regional security in Southeast Asia: Beyond the ASEAN way. The Philippines: Flipside Digital Content Company Inc.

Cans, C. (1995). Grande et petite histoire des principes generaux du droit de l’environnement dans la loi du 2 fevrier 1995/ Big and small history of the general principles of environmental law in the law of February 2, 1995. Revue juridique de l’environnement/ Environmental legal journal, no. 2.

Colocotroni, Zoe (1980). Commonvealth of Puerto Rico, Aug. 12, 10 E.L.R. 20.286.

Despax, M. (1980). Droit de l’Environnement/ Environmental Law. Paris: Ed. TEC.

Dusca, Anca Ileana (2014). Dreptul mediului/ Environmental law. Bucharest: Universul Juridic.

Duţu, M. (2000). Dreptul mediului, Tratat/ Environmental law, Treaty, vol I, Bucharest: Editura Economică.

Eliescu, M. (1972). Răspunderea civilă delictuală/ Civil liability. Bucharest: Editura Academiei.

Giroud, D. (1974). La reparation du dommage ecologique/ Repairing ecological damage. Paris: L.G.D.J.

Kamto, M. (1996). Droit de l'environnement en Afrique/Environmental Law in Africa. Paris: Edicef AUPELF.

Kiss, A.Ch. &. Lambrechts, Cl. (1976). Les procedures d’etudes d’impact en droit compare/ Impact study procedures in comparative law. R.S.E., no. 3-4.

Klemm, C. de; Martin, G.; Prieur, M. & Untermeier, J. (1989). Les qualifications des éléments de l'environnement/ Qualifications of environmental elements. Ecologie et la loi/Ecology and the law. Paris: Edition l'Harmattan.

Lamarque, J. (1975). Droit de la protection de la nature et de l environnement/ Law on the protection of nature and the environment. Paris: Librairie generale de droit et de jurisprudence (L.G.D.J.).

Lascoumes, P. (1995). Des agents un peu epars/Little scattered agents. Le Courrier de l’Environnement/The Environment Courier, April, p.8.

Lepage, C. (1995). Les grands principes tels que les decline la Loi Barnier sont a revoir/The main principles such as the Barnier Law need to be reviewed. Le Courrier de l’Environnement/The Environmental Courier, March.

Martin, G. (1988). Le repression du prejudice ecologique/ Repairing ecological damage. Colloque de Brest, “Biens- environnements/ Brest conference, “Goods-environments”.

Nanefang, G. N. (2002). Le principe de precaution dans le contexte du Protocol de Cartagena/The precautionary principle in the context of the Cartagena Protocol. Les cahiers du Droit/Law notebooks, vol. 43 no.1, March.

Negruț, G., & Stancu, A. (2012). Negotiated Justice from the perspective of the Criminal Procedure Code. Agora International Journal of Juridical Sciences, no 2.

Pireu, Raport III (1992). Le dommage ecologique en droit communautaire et compare/Ecological damage in Community and comparative law. Economica.

Prieur, M. (1991). Droit de l’Environnement/ Environmental Law. Paris: Ed. Dalloz.

Prieur, M. (2003). Le droit de l’homme a l’environement - rapport national a la reunion de UE/ The human right to the environment - national report to the EU meeting, 15 - 20 April, Ankara.

Raymond-Gouilloud, M. (1989). Du droit de detruire. Essai sur le droit de l’environnement/ The right to destroy. Environmental Law Essay, P.U.F.

Stancu, A. (2014). Protection of the Right to Life of the Person by Internal and International Legal Instruments. The 8th edition of the International Conference Education and Creativity for a Knowledge-Based Society. Bucharest 20-22 Nov. 2014.

Uliescu, M. (1993). La responsabilité pour le dommage écologique/The Responsibility for ecological damage. Revue Internationale de Droit Compare/ International Journal of Comparative Law, no. 2, Paris.

Uliescu, M. (1994). La responsabilite civile pour les activites dangereuses dans le cadre du Conseil de l’Europe/ Civil liability for dangerous activities within the framework of the Council of Europe. Revue internationale de droit compare/International Journal of Comparative Law.

Zaman, Gh. (1999). Concept, strategii, metode/Concept, strategy, method. Opinia Națională/National Opinion, no. 253.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-31

How to Cite

Aghenitei, M. (2023). The Multifunctional Content of the Human Right to the Environment. Journal of Danubian Studies and Research, 13(1), 117–140. Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/JDSR/article/view/2573

Issue

Section

Danubian Economy and Legislation