Specific Features of Linguistic Argumentation in Political Discourse

Authors

  • Galina Oleinikova Izmail State University for Humanities

Keywords:

argumentation; political discourse; political linguistics; emotional impact

Abstract

The scientific interest in argumentation in political discourse is due not only to the increasing role of politics and politicians in the world and their being in the media spotlight, but also to the emergence and development of a number of new disciplines, such as Image Studies, PR management, Political Psychology and others. The relevance of our work is that, at the present stage of development, Political Linguistics is considered to be one of the fastest growing areas of Linguistics. It deals with the study of ‘political communication’, that is speech activities which aimed at promoting certain ideas, creating emotional impact, in order to encourage people to adopt certain political ideas, decisions and actions. Politics, in fact, is a kind of linguistic activity in which language is used to exercise power. The ability to influence the addressee and manipulate human consciousness through language is increasingly becoming of interest to researchers engaged in discourse analysis, political science and linguistic studies.

Author Biography

Galina Oleinikova, Izmail State University for Humanities

PhD in Philology, Associate Professor of the Faculty of Foreign Languages

References

Belova, Alla (2003). Linguistic aspects of argument. Kyiv, p. 300.

Kwon W.; Clarke I. & Wodak R. (2014). Micro-level discursive strategies for constructing shared views around

strategic issues in team meetings. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 51, pp. 265-290.

Wodak, R. (2004). Preface: The power of language in political discourse. Journal of Language and Politics,

pp. 381-383.

Zaitseva, M. (2002) Argumentation as a linguistic element in polemics. Types of arguments. Culture of the

peoples of the Black Sea region, Vol. 32, pp. 336-338.

Кондратенко, Н. В. (2007). Український політичний дискурс: Текстуалізація реальності: Монографія.

Одеса: Чорномор’я, 156 с.

Петрик В. М.; Присяжнюк М. М.; Компанцева Л. Ф.; Скулиш Є. Д.; Бойко О. Д. & Остроухов В. В.

(2011). Сугестивні технології маніпулятивного впливу: навч. посібник . 2-ге вид. К.: ЗАТ ВІПОЛ, 248 с.

Приходько, Г. І. (2000). Контекстуальна зумовленість аргументативних оцінних висловлювань в

діалогічному дискурс. Вісник КДЛУ: Серія «Філологія», КДЛУ, 304 с.

Шевченко, Л. І.; Дергач, Д. В. & Сизонов, Д. Ю. (2014). Медіалінгвістика: словник термінів та понять.

Київ: ВПЦ «Київський університет». 380 с.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-01

How to Cite

Oleinikova, G. (2024). Specific Features of Linguistic Argumentation in Political Discourse. Journal of Danubian Studies and Research, 14(1), 87–92. Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/JDSR/article/view/2838

Issue

Section

Danubian Economy and Legislation