Theoretical Aspects on the Cognitive Dimensions in the Personality of the Pathological Gambler

  • Florian Viorel Miu Danubius University of Galați
Keywords: pathological gambler; behavior; cognitive distortions

Abstract

Ambling is a socially accepted form of entertainment, a way to spend part of free time, a
way to have a financial surplus, but which can turn over time into a destructive form that occupies the
entire psycho-social sphere of individual. The cognitive theory is a prominent approach, even dominant
in understanding human behavior. It is based on the idea that mental processes play a decisive role in
the processes of thinking, emotions and behavior. Regarding pathological gambling, cognitivist theory
supports that pathological gamblers are guided by irrational, incorrect, or false beliefs about chance,
probability, and random events. Classical cognitivist research suggests that the pathological player has
difficulty applying the principle of event independence and random results when there is a financial
incentive involved.

Author Biography

Florian Viorel Miu, Danubius University of Galați

PhD in progress, Faculty of Communication and International Relations, Specialization Psychology

References

Blaszczynski, A. & Silove, D. (1995). Cognitive and behavioral therapies for pathological gambling.
Journal of Gambling Studies, 11(2), pp. 195-220.
Ladouceur, R.; Sylvain, C.; Letarte, H.; Giroux, I. & Jacques, C. (1998). Cognitive treatment of
pathological gamblers. Behavior research and therapy, 36(12), pp. 1111-1119.
Clark, L. (2014). Disordered gambling: The evolving concept of behavioral addiction. Annals of the
New York Academy of Sciences, 1327(1), pp. 46–61.
Toneatto, T. (1999). Cognitive psychopathology of problem gambling. Substance Use & Misuse, 34,
pp. 1593– 1604.
Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of personality and social psychology, 32(2), p.
311.
Lawrence, AJ.; Astley-Jones F. & Gray N (2009). Gambling near-misses enhance motivation to gamble
and recruit win-related brain circuitry. Neuron 61(3), pp. 481–490.
Fortune, E. E. & Goodie, A. S. (2012). Cognitive distortions as a component and treatment focus of
pathological gambling: a review. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26(2), p. 298.
Oei, T. P. & Gordon, L. M. (2008). Psychosocial factors related to gambling abstinence and relapse in
members of gamblers anonymous. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(1), pp. 91–105.
Joukhador, J.; Blaszczynski, A. & Maccallum, F. (2004). Superstitious beliefs in gambling among
problem and non-problem gamblers: Preliminary data. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(2), pp. 171-
180.
Spada, M. M.; Giustina, L.; Rolandi, S.; Fernie, B. A. & Caselli, G. (2015). Profiling metacognition in
gambling disorder. Behavioral and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 43(5), pp. 614-622.
Field, M. & Cox, W. M. (2008). Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: A review of its development,
causes and consequences. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 97, pp. 1-20.
Cleeremans, A.; Timmermans, B. & Pasquali, A. (2007). Consciousness and metarepresentation: A
computational sketch. Neural Networks, 20, pp. 1032–1039.
Published
2020-11-23
Section
Articles