Public Sector Leadership in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Theoretical Framework-Based Approach to Enhance Service Delivery

Authors

  • Mantikoane Lelosa Statistics South Africa
  • Mankolo Xaverine Lethoko University of Limpopo, Turfloop Graduate School of Leadership

Abstract

Objectives: This paper provides a theoretical framework and conceptual literature review of organisational leadership in the 4th Industrial Revolution (4IR), especially in Public sector institutions in South Africa. Prior work: Agility, adoptability and adaptability in leadership have never been this important globally, coupled with many changes in this digital era. This is the main reason people, especially leadership, have to invest and embrace technology; otherwise they will perish as they would not be part of the world today. This means that organisational processes and systems have to be driven by astute leadership and a skilled workforce, to foster innovations in the business-operating model. Approach: The paper is conceptual in nature and is based on literature review of relevant articles in the field. This paper delves into the nuances of public sector leadership, shedding light on how leaders can effectively navigate the intricate intersections of technological advancements, societal expectations, and governance imperatives in the context of the 4IR. Implications: It is critical that the current workforce in the working environment, especially the public sector, is re-skilled and trained in relevant coursers or careers appropriate in the 4IR. The theoretical frameworks which are applicable to this paper include the following: Task Technology Fit; Technology Acceptance Model and Information System Success Model. Value: As the work moves to 5IR and South African public servants also have to upskill themselves so that they can be able to apply 5IR skills and competencies in order to enhance service delivery in South Africa.

References

Abdulkareem, A. K., & Ramli, R. M. (2021). Evaluating the Performance of E-government: Does Citizens’ Access to ICT Matter. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science, 29(3), 1507-1534.

Alyoussef, I. Y. (2023). Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: The role of task- technology fit with the information systems success model. Heliyon, 9, 1-19.

Alyoussef, I. Y., & Omer, M. A. O. (2023). Investigating Student Satisfaction and Adoption of Technology-Enhanced Learning to Improve Educational Outcomes in Saudi Higher Education. Sustainability, 15(19).

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.

Charan, R., Drotter, S., & Noel, J. L. (2011). The Leadership Pipeline: How to Build the Leadership Powered Company. Jossey-Bass.

Davos, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum.

Ghislieri, C., Emanuel, F., Molino, M., Cortese, C. G., & Colombo, L. (2017). New technologies smart, or harm work-family boundaries management? Gender differences in conflict and enrichment using the JD-R theory. Psychology, 8, 1070.

Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213-236.

Harlie, M., Hairul, H., Rajiani, I., & Abbas, E. W. (2019). Managing information systems by integrating the information systems success model and the unified theory of acceptance and usage of technology. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 20(1), 192-201.

Howard, M., & Rose, J. (2018). Refining and Extending Task–Technology Fit Theory: Creation of Two Task–Technology Fit Scales and Empirical Clarification of the Construct. Information & Management. 56, 10.

Humble, J., & Farley, D. (2010). Continuous Delivery: Reliable Software Releases through Build, Test, and Deployment Automation. Pearson Education.

Jarbandham, D. B. (2017). Principles for Public Sector Leadership in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Administratio Publica, 25(4), 60-76.

Mathieson, K., & Keil, M. (1998). Beyond the interface: Ease of use and task/technology fit. Information and Management, 34(4), 221-230.

Nidumolu, S. R., Subramani, M., & Aldrich, C. (2001). Organizational and Technological antecedents of Knowledge Sharing. Management Science, 47(12), 1611-1623.

Nusantara, B. (2017). Gartner hype cycle: the development of company in adopting advance technology in 4.0 era. Binus University.

Putri, G. A., Widagdo, A. K., & Setiawan, D. (2023). Analysis of financial technology acceptance of peer to peer lending (P2P lending) using extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1), 1-12.

Raelin, J. (2016). Imagine there are no leaders: Reframing leadership as collaborative agency. Leadership, 12(2), 131-158.

Raelin, J. A. (Ed.). (2016). Leadership-as-practice: Theory and application. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Rigby, D. K., Sutherland, J., & Takeuchi, H. (2017). Embracing Agile: How to Master the Process That’s Transforming Management. Harvard Business Review, 94(5), 40-50.

Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Crown Business.

Schwaber, K., & Sutherland, J. (2017). The definitive guide to scrum: The rules of the game. https://www.scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide/v2017/2017-Scrum-Guide-US.pdf

Siegel, D., Acharya, P., & Sivo, S. (2017). Extending the technology acceptance model to improve usage & decrease resistance toward a new technology by faculty in higher education. Journal of Technology Studies, 43(2), 58-69.

South Africa Department of Communications and Digital Technologies. (2020). National Digital and Future Skills Strategy. Government printers.

South Africa Department of National Treasury. (2021). Minister Tito Mboweni Budget Speech. Unpublished.

Statistics South Africa (Stats SA). (2020). Strategic plan. Unpublished document.

Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution: how the technology behind Bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. Penguin Publishers.

Topol, E. J. (2019). Deep Medicine: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Healthcare Human Again. Basic Books.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.

World Economic Forum. (2016). Leadership in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Its time for an upgrade. World Economic Forum.

World Economic Forum. (2018). Realizing the Potential of Blockchain: A Multistakeholder Approach to the Stewardship of Blockchain and Cryptocurrencies. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Realizing_Potential_Blockchain.pdf

World Economic Forum. (2018). The Future of Jobs Report 2018.

World Economic Forum. (2019). The 4 types of leader who will thrive in the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Publishers.

Zaleznik, A. (2004). Managers and leaders: Are they Different? Havard Business Review Magazine. Pearson.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19

How to Cite

Lelosa, M., & Lethoko, M. X. (2025). Public Sector Leadership in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Theoretical Framework-Based Approach to Enhance Service Delivery. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Administratio, 17(1), 286–306. Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDA/article/view/2883

Issue

Section

Articles