Enhancing Organisational Performance Through Public-Private Partnerships: The Case of the National System of Innovation in South Africa
Abstract
Prior work: Although businesses worldwide are underpinned by networking and fostering strategic partnerships, South African organisations such as the NSI have not fully exploited public-private partnerships (PPPs) to improve their performance, maximise impact and customer value. Objectives: This study will address this ‘knowledge gap’ by providing an in-depth understanding of issues and challenges experienced by organisations in the NSI when fostering PPPs and recommending strategies for improved performance and cohesion in the NSI. Approach: This qualitative study critically examined the role of PPPs in improving organisational performance. Purposive non-probability sampling was used to select and interview 30 participants in the Gauteng Province of South Africa. A thematic analysis software called Delve was used to organise the qualitative data and generate codes and themes, and a thematic map was used to depict patterns and relationships graphically. Results: Limited funding, policy restrictions, systematic fragmentation, internal incompetence, and organisational competence emerged as factors hindering the formation of partnerships. PPPs are likely to be successful if they are formed between organisations that have complementary visions and values. The study’s findings also demonstrate that internal competence is critical to the success of PPPs. Implications: The proposed framework could improve the NSI’s performance in achieving national goals such as economic growth, job creation, and the attraction of investment. Value: A PPP framework was developed to assist National System of Innovation (NSI) organisations in enhancing performance.
References
Alexander, R. (2021). Assessing the Ability of the National Innovation System of South Africa to Facilitate the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg. https://www.uj.ac.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/sarchi-wp-2021-8b-alexander-september.pdf
Arimoro, A., & Elgujja, A. (2021). Raising private finance for public infrastructure in Sub-Saharan Africa: Exploring Infrastructure Mutual Funds and Islamic Finance. Journal of Islamic Economic and Business Studies, 7(1), 18-26.
Atkinson, R. (2020). Understanding the U.S. National Innovation System, 2020. Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. https://www2.itif.org/2020-us-innovation-system.pdf
Badgett, K. (2016). School-business partnerships: Understanding business perspectives. School Community Journal, 26(2), 83-95.
Bass, K. (2018). Organizational reputation: For public organizations. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=publicsectormedialiteracy
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. American Psychological.
Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391-1412. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
Compassion Capital Fund National Resource Center. (2015). Partnerships: Frameworks for Working Together. https://uwm.edu/mcwp/wp-content/uploads/sites/337/2015/11/Partnerships_Frameworks-for-Working-Together.pdf
Department of Science and Technology. (2019). White paper on science, technology and innovation. Government Gazette, 41909.
Dumpere, J., Qamar, M., Allam, H., & Malik, S. (2023). The impact of innovation on economic growth, foreign direct investment, and self-employment: a global perspective. Economies, 11(7), 180.
FCDO. (2021). Global Health: Due Diligence guide for external partners. https://www.ukaidmatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Due-diligence-requirements-applicant-guidelines.pdf
Feng, W., Zhao, L., & Chen, Y. (2022). Research on collaborative innovation mode of enterprise group from the perspective of comprehensive innovation management. Sustainability, 14(9), 4-11.
Flores-Amador, J. (2014). Systems of innovation and the adoption of biotechnologies: The case of Mexico. International Journal of Biotechnology, 13(1-3), 120-136.
Huberts, L. W. (2018). Integrity: What it is and Why it is Important. Public Integrity, S18-S32.
Jakeman, M. (2023). A deeper understanding: Building trust in Business Partnerships. https://impact.economist.com/perspectives/sites/default/files/a_deeper_understanding_-building_trust_in_business_relationships_paper.pdf
Manzini, S. (2012). The national system of innovation concept: An ontological review and critique. South African Journal of Science, 9(10), 2-6.
Masero, R. (2023). Evaluating the effectiveness of skills transfer in the workplace. Training industry. https://trainingindustry.com/articles/measurement-and-analytics/evaluating-the-effectiveness-of-skills-transfer-in-the-workplace-part-2/
Mashwama, N., Thwala, W. D., & Aigbavboa, C. (2018). The role of public-private partnership in improving service delivery in South Africa. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nokulunga-Mashwama-2/publication/339282036_CHALLENGES_FACED_BY_PUBLIC-PRIVATE_PARTNERSHIP_IN_IMPROVING_SERVICE_DELIVERY/links/612537d21e95fe241af58f4c/CHALLENGES-FACED-BY-PUBLIC-PRIVATE-PARTNERSHIP-IN-IMPROVING-SERVICE-DELIVERY.pdf
Mentari, S., Zahroh, F., & Ermayda, R. (2019). Effectiveness of the Board of Commissioners Role: Review of Resources Dependence Theory. In 3rd International Conference on Accounting.
Morton, S., Bandara, D., Robinson, E. M., & Carr, P. (2012). In the 21st Century, what is an acceptable response rate? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 36(2), 106-108.
National Advisory Council on Innovation. (2019). Framework for the Science Technology Decadal Plan: Raising to the challenge. https://www.naci.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/FRAMEWORK-FOR-THE-DEVELOPMENT-OF-THE-SCIENCE-TECHNOLOGY-AND-INNOVATION-DECADAL-PLAN_FINAL.pdf
Palo, O. M., Kivijärvi, M., & Aromaa, E. (2017). Challenges in academic commercialisation: a case study of the scientists’ experiences. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 8(1-2), 23-30.
Radu, M. (2015). Political stability-a condition for sustainable growth in Romania? Procedia Economics and Finance, 30, 751-754.
Razwinani, M., Tshikovhi, N., & Motaung, K. S. (2024). Benefits and Challenges of Research Commercialisation in South Africa: A Systemic Review. African Journal of Inter/Multidisciplinary Studies, 6(1), 1-10.
Samanta, R. P. (2021). Inductive Approach: Its Pros & Cons. Scholars International Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 4(11), 351-353.
Santhosh, M. (2021). Significance of Performance Management Activities in Improving Employees’ Skills and Abilities: A Study on Selected It Industries. Iconic Research and Engineering Journal, 4(7), 55-59.
Smilevski, C., Smilevski, G., Galovska, B., & Gjorgjievski, I. (2021). Mapping Organizational Learning Practices in Organizations in North Macedonia. Knowledge-International Journal, 47(1), 16-22.
Uludag, B. K. (2013). Due diligence. Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Berna-Kirkulak-Uludag/publication/303929142_Due_Diligence/links/61ec9d5edafcdb25fd459ac3/Due-Diligence.pdf
USDT. (2012). Risk assessment for public-private partnerships: A primer. Innovate programme delivery. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/pdfs/p3/p3_risk_assessment_primer_122612.pdf
Wang, L., Zhou, L., Xiong, Y., & Yan, D. (2019). Effect of Promotion Pressure and financial burden on Investment in public-private partnership infrastructure projects in China. Asian‐Pacific Economic Literature, 33(2), 128-142.
Wulandari, M. (2024). The Impact of Government Capital Expenditure Effectiveness Including Public-Private Partnership Involvement on Economic Growth: Evidence in Indonesia. Master’s thesis.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Christopher Motloi, Krishna Kistan Govender

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The author fully assumes the content originality and the holograph signature makes him responsible in case of trial.
