The Confluence of Biological, Rational and Unconscious Substrates: The Witness Metaphor in the Etiology of Power

Authors

  • Alina Necșulescu UNSTPB

Keywords:

power; relations of domination; ethology; psychoanalysis; analytic philosophy

Abstract

To comprehend the intricate power relations that shape intrapsychic and interindividual levels, a multifaceted approach is imperative, as these relations have been extensively contemplated and researched, yet they cannot be confined within a single theoretical framework. Consequently, no single field of enquiry possesses the capacity to comprehensively articulate a phenomenon and its attendant implications. With all these insights from these broad domains in mind, this article proposes the addition of a fourth scenario to Ivan Chase’s categorisation, which can also become an intrapsychic metaphor as an attitude towards self and a crucial function in shaping identity.  The primary objective of this article is not to delineate a predetermined form of power, but rather to elucidate its developmental processes, its etiology, and the manifold external and internal factors that contribute to its manifestation. In this regard, it can be conceptualised as a narrative rather than a mere noun or verb.

References

Adler, A. (1935). The Science of Living. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Alizade, A. (1995). Constructing and Deconstructing Woman’s Power. Oxfordshire: Routledge.

Allen, A. (1999). The Power of Feminist Theory: Domination, Resistance, Solidarity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Aron, R. (1986). Eseuri despre teoria violenței. Bucharest: Editura Politică.

Barry, B. (1991). Democracy and Power. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Broom, M. (2002). A unified model of dominance hierarchy formation and maintenance. Animal Behaviour, 64(1), 77–86.

Broucek, F. J. (1982). Shame and its relationship to early narcissistic developments. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 63, 369-378.

Brown, J. L. (1975). The Evolution of Behavior. New York: Norton.

Butler, J. (1997). The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Chase, I. (1974). Models of hierarchy formation in animal societies. Behavioral Science, 19, 374–382.

Chase, I. (1980). Social process and hierarchy formation in small groups: A comparative perspective. American Sociological Review, 45(6), 905–924.

Coseriu, E. (2022). Interdisciplinarity and Language. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Communicatio, 16(3) (Special issue), 12-39.

Coseriu, E. (2022). Semantics and Methodology. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Communicatio, 16(3) (Special issue). Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDC/article/view/2247.

Flathman, R. (2003). Freedom and Its Conditions: Discipline, Autonomy and Resistance. London: Routledge.

Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin.

Foucault, M. (2000). Power, Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Vol. 3. New York: The New Press.

Foucault, M. (2000). The ethics of the concern for self as a practice of freedom. In M. Foucault, Essential Works 1954–1984, Vol. 1: Ethics. London: Penguin.

French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The Bases of Social Power. In D. P. Cartwright, A. Arbor (eds.) Studies in Social Power. MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

Freud, S. (1914). On Narcissism: An Introduction. Read & Co. Great Essays.

Freud, S. (1915). Thoughts for the Times on War and Death. Read & Co. Great Essays.

Freud, S. (1919). A Child Is Being Beaten. A Contribution to the Study of the Origin of Sexual Perversions. Read & Co. Great Essays.

Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and Its Discontents. Read & Co. Great Essays.

Freud, S. (1950 [1985]). Project for a Scientific Psychology. Read & Co. Great Essays

Fromm, E. (2010). On Disobedience. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

Hallinan, M. J. (1974). The structure of positive sentiment. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Hamilton, L. (2013). Freedom is Power: Liberty through Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hockenberry, S. L. (1995). Dyadic Violence, Shame, And Narcissism. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 31, 301.

Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1971). Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Comparative Group Studies, 2, 107-124.

Hook, D. (2010). Foucault, psychology and the analytics of power. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Horney, K. (1945). Our inner conflicts. New York: Norton.

Laplanche, J. (1989). New Foundations for Psychoanalysis (trad. David Macey). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Lewis, H. B. (1987). Shame and the narcissistic personality. In D. L. Nathanson (Ed.), The many faces of shame, pp. 93-132. New York: Guilford Press.

Lukes, S. (1978). Power and Authority. In T. Bottomore & R. Nisbet (Eds.), A History of Sociological Analysis. London: Heinemann.

Lukes, S. (1986). Power. New York: New York University Press.

Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A Radical View (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

McGrew, W. C. (1972). An Ethological Study of Children’s Behavior. New York: Academic Press.

Missakian, E. (1976). Dominance Hierarchies in Preschool Children. Child Development, 47(1), 304–309.

Morrison, A. P. (1989). Shame: The underside of narcissism. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

Morriss, P. (2002). Power: A Philosophical Analysis (2nd ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Munteanu, C. (2022). Text as a symbol. Towards a hermeneutics of recognition. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Communicatio, 16(3), 111-123.

O’Leary, J., & Wright, F. (1986). Shame and gender issues in pathological narcissism. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 3(4), 327-339.

Oliver, K. (2001). Witnessing: Beyond Recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Peräkylä, A., & Stevanovic, M. (2012). Deontic authority in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(3), 297–321.

Russell, B. (1938). Power: A New Social Analysis. London: Allen and Unwin.

Savin-Williams, R. C. (1977; 1979; 1980). Dominance hierarchies in groups of adolescents. Developmental Psychology.

Strayer, F. F., & Strayer, J. (1976). An ethological study of social behaviour among preschool children. Child Development, 47(4), 980–989.

Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.

Weber, M. (1964). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press.

Weber, M. (1992). Basic Concepts in Sociology. New York: Citadel.

Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Winnicott, D. W. (1965). Maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development. New York: International Universities Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Necșulescu, A. (2024). The Confluence of Biological, Rational and Unconscious Substrates: The Witness Metaphor in the Etiology of Power. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Communicatio, 18(2), 24–41. Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDC/article/view/3376

Issue

Section

Sensus et Interpretatio