Public Procurement Corruption and Corporate Scandals in Limpopo Province, South Africa: A Content Analysis Perspective
Public procurement processes are riddled with corruption and scandals; in some instances, such corrupt activities are difficult to detect. Thus, this article report on the study that was conducted in Limpopo Province, South Africa on public procurement corruption. The aim of the study was to identify forms and determinants of public procurement corruption that were common in the province and to develop intervention strategies that would combat the scourge of corruption. The study adopted a qualitative content analysis approach to collect and analyze data. The computer-assisted software analysis package-NVivo 11 pro™- was used to analyze data. Data was collected from the analysis of 5 journal articles and 40 newspaper articles from Sowetan Newspapers and Polokwane Observer. The study adopted a 4-year longitudinal study analysis, from 1st of January 2013 until the 31st of December 2016. The method employed the word count, word cloud, and word tree queries. Concepts and terms such as fraud and bribery were some of the concepts probed to arrive at conclusions. The study concluded that political interference, officials’ tendencies of contravening rules and regulations caused public procurement corruption. The study further employed the principal agency theory to recommend that there should be a rotation of officials and transparency in procurement processes.
Callendar, G. & Mathews, D. (2000). “Government Purchasing: An Evolving Profession?” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 12(2), 272-290.
Cavanagh S. (1997) Content analysis: concepts, methods and applications. Nurse Researcher 4, 5–16.
Department of Public Service and Administration. (2003). Country corruption assessment report, DPSA, Pretoria, South Africa.
De Sousa, L. (2006), “European Anti-Corruption Agencies: Protecting Community’s Financial Interests in a Knowledge-based, Innovative and Integrated Manner,” Final Report, OLAF, Lisbon.
Eyaa, S. & Oluka, P. (2011). Explaining non- compliance in public procurement in Uganda. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(11).
Fjeldstad, O. (2003), “Fighting Fiscal Corruption: Lessons from the Tanzania Revenue Authority,” Public Administration and Development 23, pp. 165-175.
Flick, U. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research. London, UK: Sage.
Gordhan, P. (2014), Budget speech, National Treasury, Cape Town. Government Printers.
Health, J. & Norman, W. (2004). Stakeholder theory, corporate governance and public management. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 247-265.
Karjalainen, K., Katariina, K. & Erik, M. V. R. (2009). On-Compliant Work Behaviour in Purchasing: An Exploration of Reasons behind Maverick Buying. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 245–261.
Klitgaard, R., Maclean-Abaroa, R. & Lindsey Parris, H., (2000), Corrupt cities: A practical guide to cure and prevention, Institute for Contemporary Studies & World Bank Institute, Pretoria.
Kynga¨s H. & Vanhanen L. (1999) Content analysis (Finnish). Hoitotiede 11, 3–12.
Lloyd, R. E., and McCue, C. P. (2004) What Is Public Procurement? Definitional Problems and Implications, International Public Procurement Conference Proceedings, Volume 3.
Madumo, S.O. (2012). ‘The promotion of developmental local government to facilitate a developmental state’, Administratio Publica 20(3), 40–54.
Mafunisa, M. J. (2007). Corruption and Service Delivery in the Public Service: The case of Limpopo Province. Journal of Public Administration. 42 (3): 260-270.
Marshall C. & Rossman G.B. (1995) Designing Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, London.
Mayring, P. (2008). Qualitative Inhalt-analyse – Grundlagen und Techniken (Qualitative content analysis), Beltz Verlag, Weinheim.
Mentzer, J. T., Stank, T. P. & Esper, T. L. (2008). Supply chain management and its relationship to logistics. Marketing, Production, and Operations Management. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1), 31-46.
Moeti, K. (Ed.). (2014). Public finance fundamentals, 2nd edn. Juta, Cape Town.
Reddy, P.S., Naidoo, P. & Pillay, P., 2005, ‘Local democracy and developmental local government in South Africa beyond the first decade: Quo vadis?’ Africanus 35(2), 40–52.
Mubangizi, J. (2020). Corruption in SA: The Politics, the Law and all the Shenanigens in between. City Press.
(Access date: 3 May 2021)
News 24. (2011). Five Limpopo Departments under Administration.
(Access date: 8 April 2021)
Roodhooft, F. & Abbeele, A. V. D. (2006). Public procurement of consulting services Evidence and comparison with private companies. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(5), 490-512.
Rosmawati H. and Norbahiyah O. (2013) Combating Fraud in Public Procurement: A Never Ending Story, Global Trends in Financial Crimes in the New Economies: The 5th International Conference on Financial Criminology (ICFC) 2013, pp. 199-205.
Ruhiiga, T.M (2009) Costing the impact of corruption on service delivery in South Africa: An exploratory overview. Journal of Public Administration, 44 (4): 1090 1101.
Sandelowski M. (1995) Qualitative analysis: what it is and how to begin? Research in Nursing & Health 18, 371–375.
Seuring, S., & Gold, S. (2012). Conducting content-analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 544-555.
Soliman, H & Cable, S. (2011). Sinking under the weight of corruption: Neoliberal reform, political accountability and justice. Current Sociology, 59(6) 735–753.
Soreide, T. (2002). ‘Corruption in public procurement; Causes, consequences and cures. Chr. Michelsen Institute South Africa. Department: Public Service and Administration. 2002. Business Survey on Corruption – Research Report.
Thornhill, C. (2006) ‘Effective municipal government and administration as preconditions for efficient service delivery’, Journal of Public Administration, Conference proceedings September, 317–332.
UNODC. (2020). The Doha Declaration: Promoting a Culture of Lawfulness. Investigation of Corruption.
(Access date: 17 March 2021)
Copyright (c) 2021 Maria Kanjere, Aaron Koto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The author fully assumes the content originality and the holograph signature makes him responsible in case of trial.