Personal and Confidential Diplomacy of the Big Three


  • Gheorghe Ștefan Danubius University of Galati


secret; communization; character diplomatic; democracy; superiority


The three Great Powers, U.K., U.S.A. and U.S.S.R., as main supporters of the war against the Axis forces, were very much different from each other in terms of interests, ideology and governance system. The Anglo-Soviet agreement for reciprocal assistance (July 1941) and especially the Atlantic Charter (August 1941), through which England and USA declared their mutual political objectives, accelerated the official conclusion of the United Nations Declaration (January 1, 1942, Washington) signed by twenty-six states which committed to collaboration only, while separate peace treaties with the aggressor had to be excluded. This war alliance, as its own members perceived it, was not based on trust, but on necessity; it did not result from “a deep feeling of mutually shared values or similar interests, but on the counteraction against one single enemy:” The need for timing during the war and the postwar objectives would often prove to be a challenge for the alliance. As it was only natural, the Big Three tried to avoid as much as possible the dismantling of the frail alliance in order to further fulfill the purposes which had determined them to enter the war: defeating the Axis, establishing new principles for the international order, peaceful coexistence, etc.

Author Biography

Gheorghe Ștefan, Danubius University of Galati

Associate Professor, PhD


Abdrew, C. & Gordievski, Oleg, (1994). K.G.B. Secret History. Brasov: ALL.
Blond, Georges (1992). Agony of the Reich. Craiova: Gecom.
Bresinski, Zbigniew (1999). Great Chessboard. American supremacy and its geostrategic imperatives. Bucharest: Encyclopedic Universe.
Burchill, Scott et al (2008). Theories of International Relations. Iasi: European Institute.
Buzan, Barry (2009). Little Richard, International Systems in World History. Iasi: Polirom.
Buzatu, Gh. (1995). The Secret History of the Second World War. Bucharest: Scientific and Encyclopedic.
Carpinschi, Anton & Mărgărit, Diana (2001). International Organizations. Iasi: Polirom.
Churchill, Winston (1996). World War II - Memoirs, vol II. Bucharest: Saeculum.
de Lunay, Jacques (1993). Psychology and Sexuality in the Great Sea. Tamil Nadu: Venus.
Duculescu, V. (1986). Hypostases of Diplomacy. Bucharest.
Durosselle, Jean-Baptiste (2006). History of International Relations, vol. 1-2. Bucharest Social and Political Sciences Publishing House.
Fontaine, Andre (1992). Cold War History. Bucharest: Ed. Militara.
Hatchet, D. D. & Springfield, G. G. (1991). Yalta, agreements for 50 years. Bucharest: Excelsior.
Hlihor, Constantin (2005). Geopolitics and Geostrategy in the Analysis of Contemporary International Relations. Bucharest “Carol I” National Defense University Publishing House.
Johnson, Paul (2003). A History of the Modern World. 1920-2000. Bucharest: Humanitas.
Judt, Tony (2008). Postwar Europe. A history of Europe after 1945. Iasi: Polirom.
Kissinger Henry (2002). Diplomacy. Bucharest: ALLFA.
Kolodziej, Edward A. (2007). Security and International Relations. Iasi: Polirom.
Lloyd, C. Gardner (1996). Spheres of Influence. Bucharest: Elite.
Miroiu, Andrei & Ungureanu, Radu-Sebastian (2006). Handbook of International Relations. Iasi: Polirom.
Mourre, M. (1978). Dictinnaire encyclopedique d’Histoire/ Encyclopedic Dictionary of History, vol 7. Paris: Bardas Publishing House.
Parish, David (2002). Encyclopedia of the Cold War. Bucharest Univers Enciclopedic Publishing House.
Pierre, Milza & Berstein, Serge (1998). History of the 20th Century, vol 1-3. Bucharest: ALLFA.
Roth, Francois (2007). Inventing Europe. Iasi: European Institute Publishing House.
Tudor, I. Panait. The Cold War 11 crises 24 characters. History Files, no. 6/197.




How to Cite

Ștefan, G. (2022). Personal and Confidential Diplomacy of the Big Three: Array. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Relationes Internationales, 14(2). Retrieved from