Hybrid Security in the Post-Modern Era: Challenges and Responses in International Relations
Keywords:
governance; hybrid warfare; hybrid security; resilience; proxy actorsAbstract
The contemporary international system faces a diversity of security threats, in the context of an international dynamic that is in continuous change. Moreover, we can note the existence of economic interdependence, multipolarity and the acceleration of technological progress. Thus, the international society faces complex security challenges, including hybrid threats, the escalation of cyber conflicts, the intensification of geopolitical competition and the increase in vulnerabilities associated with climate crises and social instability. The transitional space between peace and war has expanded, transforming into a zone of unconventional conflict, characterized by threats such as propaganda, cyberattacks and disinformation. The asymmetric practices adopted by certain states generate an intensification of concerns at the international level, determining an acute need for cooperation between actors, in order to build a common front against hybrid threats.
The concept of hybrid security has developed as a specific response to the postmodern era, aiming to combat conventional and unconventional attacks in a highly interconnected international system. This research aims to analyse, through a multidisciplinary approach, the reactions of the international community to such challenges, as well as the main instruments developed by leading global actors, such as the European Union and NATO, in managing them. The study also identifies and examines the main types of hybrid threats, approached through the lens of classical theories of international relations.
Finally, the paper discusses aspects related to global governance in the context of a multipolar world and explores possible responses, both from a theoretical and applied perspective, to the stated security challenges. This approach contributes to a deeper understanding of the adaptation and resilience mechanisms of the international system in the face of new forms of hybrid conflict.
References
Abdyraeva, C. (2020). The Use of Cyberspace in the Context of Hybrid warfare: Means, Challenges and Trends. Working Paper no. 107. Wien: Austrian Institute for International Affairs.
Ardemagni, E. (2024, April). Historical perspective and the terminology issue: defining post 2011 hybrid security actors. Doha: Arab Center for Research & Policy Studies.
Banasik, M. (2016). A changing security paradigm. New roles for new actors - the Russian approach. Connections: The Quarterly Journal, 15(4), 31-43.
COI Strategy and Defense (n.d.). Hybrid CoE. Retrieved from https://www.hybridcoe.fi/coi-strategy-and-defence/, date: 25.11.2024.
Collier, J. (2017). Proxy actors in the cyber domain: implications for state strategy. St. Antony’s International Review, 13(1).
Conceptul strategic al NATO 2022/NATO Strategic Concept 2022 (2022). Retrieved from https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/6/pdf/290622-strategic-concept-ro.pdf, date: 25.11.2024.
Countering hybrid threats (2016). North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. Retrieved from https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_156338.htm?selectedLocale=en, date: 24.11.2024.
Directive on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union (NIS2 Directive) (n.d.). European Commission. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/nis2-directive, date: 28.11.2024.
Filipec, O. (2019). Hybrid warfare: between realism, liberalism and constructivism. Central European Journal of Politics, 5(2).
Geri, M. (2024). Understanding Russian Hybrid Warfare against Europe in the energy sector and in the future “energy-resouces-climate” security nexus. Journal of Strategic Security, 17(3).
Hartmann, U. (2017, September). The Evolution of the Hybrid Threat, and Resilience as a Countermeasure. Research Paper 139. NATO Defense College.
Johnson, R., Kitzen, M., & Sweijs, T. (2021). The conduct of war in the 21st century. Kinetic, connected and synthetic. New York: Routledge.
Kanwal, G. (2018). Hybrid Warfare: The Changing Character of Conflict. New Delhi: Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, Pentagon Press.
Locked Shields (n.d.). The NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence. Retrieved from https://ccdcoe.org/locked-shields/, date: 26.11.2024;
Moravscik, A. (1992). Liberalism and international relations theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Center for European Studies, Harvard University.
Morgenthau, H. (1973). Politics among nations. The struggle for power and peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Murray, W. & Mansoor, P. (2012). Hybrid warfare. Fighting complex opponents from the ancient world to the present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
NATO Response Force (n.d.). North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. Retrieved from https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_49755.htm, date: 26.11.2024.
Nye, J. (1990). Soft power. Foreign Policy, 80.
Questions and Answers about the East StratCom Task Force (n.d.). European Union External Action - The Diplomatic Service of the European Union. Retrieved from https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/questions-and-answers-about-east-stratcom-task-force_en, date: 28.11.2024.
Raugh, D. (2016). Is the hybrid threat a true threat? Journal of Strategic Security, 9(2).
Reichborn-Kjennerud, E. & Cullen, P. (2016). What is Hybrid Warfare? NUPI Policy Brief, 1. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.
Timeline - Packages of sanctions against Russia since February 2022 (2024). European Council - Council of the European Union. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/sanctions-against-russia/timeline-packages-sanctions-since-february-2022/, date: 29.11.2024.
von Clausewitz, C. (2017). On war. Augsburg: Jazzybee Verlag.
Wales Summit Declaration (2014). Retrieved from https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_112964.htm?mode=pressrelease, date: 24.11.2024.
Warsaw Summit Declaration (2014). Retrieved from https://www.nato.int/cps/de/natohq/official_texts_133169.htm, date: 24.11.2024.
Wendt, A. (1995). Constructing International Politics. International Security, 20(1).
Wither, J. (2016). Making sense of hybrid warfare. Connections: The Quarterly Journal, 15(2).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Andreea-Loredana Tudor
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The author fully assumes the content originality and the holograph signature makes him responsible in case of trial.