Impact of Ideological Bias on Intelligence Analysis

Authors

  • Mircea Mocanu

Keywords:

Intelligence analysis, epistemic value, psychological determinants, ideological bias, cognitive function.

Abstract

This paper intends to explore the consequences of considering that Intelligence support is a communication process between the analyst and the decision-maker. This is important when working to identify ways to improve the quality of intelligence analysis. There are multiple studies on communication process and general analysis to build upon, but there are few interdisciplinary approaches between psychology and intelligence theory. Current approach uses a systemic view of the intelligence cycle as open system and applies psychological concepts and security/analytical requirements. Observation of intelligence failures and intelligence analysis experience, as methods employed in systemic logic, lead to relevant conclusions regarding the main factors to be considered for improving intelligence analysis. Main results of this approach point to the importance of understanding the psychological determinants of the key participants in Intelligence support. The implications of controlling the factors able to corrupt intelligence analysis have practical value for the work of researchers and practitioners in intelligence. This approach opens avenues for better understanding analytical errors and for identifying ways to preserve the quality of Intelligence support, at both individual and institutional levels. Conclusions of such research may extend to the quality of public debates in the media.

References

Dicţionarul Explicativ al Limbii Române – DEX. (1984). Bucureşti: Editura Academiei.

Heuer, R. J. Jr. (1999). Psychology of Intelligence Analysis. Center for the Studies of Intelligence, CIA, US.

Hybels, S., & Richard, W. II. (1986). Communicating Effectively. New York: Random House.

Johnson, L. K. (coord.). (2007). Strategic Intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International.

Kant, I. (2009). Critica rațiunii pure/Critique of Pure Reason. Bucharest: Cogito Publishers.

Marrin, S. (2019). Analytic objectivity and science: evaluating the US Intelligence Community’s approach to applied epistemology. Intelligence and National Security, 35(3), 350-366.

Mocanu, M. (2012). Criteria for Establishing the Optimal Distance between Analyst and Decision-Maker. Revista Română de Studii de Intelligence, 8(12), 15-26. Bucureşti: Institutul de Studii de Intelligence al Academiei Naţionale de Informaţii „Mihai Viteazul”.

Mocanu, M. (2012). Particularities of Intelligence Warning as Communication Process. Bucharest: Direcţia Generală de Informaţii a Apărării.

Mocanu, M. (2013). Military Intelligence as Open System. Conferinţa Ştiinţifică Internaţională Strategii XXI, vol. 2, pp. 276-285. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii Naţionale De Apărare „Carol I”, Centrul de Studii Strategice de Apărare şi Securitate. Retrieved from: https://cssas.unap.ro/ro/pdf_carti/conferinta_2013_vol_2.pdf.

Moore, D. (2011). Sensemaking. A Structure for an Intelligence Revolution. Clift Series on the Intelligence Profession. Washington DC: National Defense Intelligence College.

Omand, D. (2010). Securing the State. London: Hurst&Co.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-17

How to Cite

Mocanu, M. (2025). Impact of Ideological Bias on Intelligence Analysis. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Relationes Internationales, 18(1), 7–29. Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDRI/article/view/3440

Issue

Section

Articles