The Potential Risks for the Ecological and Social Security in the Danube Region and their Overcoming in the Context of the New European Agenda
Keywords:
risk; ecological security; social security; risk prevention; cross-border projectsAbstract
Objectives: The aim of this paper is to interpret some risks for the ecological and social security in the Danube region, such us: risks of fire in the forest areas, risks of floods, risks for the natural and cultural heritage, risk of economic and social disproportions in the cross-border areas, etc. Another aim of the study is to discuss the possible solution of risk coping within the frames of the new European agenda for the green transition and carbon-free economies. Prior Work: Theoretical and experimental research of the authors in the field. Approach: Secondary data analysis and overview of cross-border projects and their results focused on the risk overcoming in the Bulgarian-Romanian cross-border region along the Danube river. Results: There is sufficient European funding (Interreg VA Romania-Bulgaria program, Interreg Danube program, Horizon Europe), providing favourable conditions for risk overcoming in the Danube region. It is necessary to increase the capacity of the human resources in the region (public administrations, businesses, NGOs), to elaborate common strategic documents for the cross-border regions and to use the research and innovation potential of the universities within the region in benefit of the economic and social prosperity. Implications: The paper can stimulate a larger discussion in the scientific circles about the necessity of joint research on the new risks and their overcoming. Value: The study will contribute to the interdisciplinary interpretation of the risks in the contemporary societies and will outline the value of the cross-border projects with European funding for risk prevention and management.
References
Beck U. 2001. La société du risque, Sur la voie d'une autre modernité (trad. de l'allemand par Laure Bernardi, préface de Bruno Latour). Paris, Aubier. Première édition: Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne (1986).
Blom, Ph. 2017 Was auf dem Spiel steht.
Daykin, Ch. 2004. Financial governance and risk management of social security. International Social Security Association. Technical Report 15.
Ewald F. 1996. Histoire de l'État-providence. Paris, Grasset et Fasquelle/Le Livre de Poche.
Giddens A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. Stanford, Stanford University Press.
Giddens A. 1994. Les Conséquences de la modernité. Paris, L'Harmattan.
Jackson, T. 2016. Prosperity without Growth - Foundations for the economy of tomorrow.
Mitchell, R. 2018. International Environmental Agreements Database Project. 2002-2020. https://iea.uoregon.edu/treaty-text/3925 Accessed June 2022
The Global Risk Report 2020 https://reports.weforum.org/global-risks-report-2020/ Accessed June 2022
WBGU German Advisory Council on Global Change. 2020. Rethinking Land in the Anthropocene: from Separation to Integration.
http://ses.ens-lyon.fr/articles/sociologie-du-risque-et-crises-sanitaires-un-eclairage-sur-la-pandemie-du-coronavirus (Accessed October 2021)
https://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?338711/The-Danube-River-and-its-Delta-well-known-but-threatened-by-multiple-pressures Accessed June 2022
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/society/20180703STO07129/eu-responses-to-climate-change Accessed June 2022
https://climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu/countries-regions/transnational-regions/danube Accessed June 2022
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Krasimir Koev, Ana Popova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The author fully assumes the content originality and the holograph signature makes him responsible in case of trial.