A Dual Perspective on Experiential Learning and Psychological Intervention in Prison: Formative and Clinical Insights
Abstract
This article explores the psychological challenges encountered in a maximum-security prison setting and highlights psychological interventions through a dual-perspective analysis that combines the experiential learning of a psychology intern with the clinical expertise of a supervising psychologist. The study examines the dynamics of mental health in detention and underscores the role of psychological interventions in managing suicide risk, hunger strikes, and severe psychiatric disorders. While existing literature recognizes the importance of psychological assessment and intervention in carceral settings, few studies merge educational practice with clinical analysis. This paper addresses that gap by presenting a locally grounded, twofold perspective linking professional development with practical insights. The methodology included direct observation, case reflection, and structured supervisory discussions. Clinical situations were jointly analyzed to identify effective strategies and extract professional learning outcomes. Emphasis was placed on reflective practice, integrating field experiences with theoretical frameworks. The analysis revealed recurrent challenges such as heightened inmate stress, communication barriers, and a high incidence of suicidal behaviors. Interventions focused on emotional stabilization, treatment adherence, and adaptive functioning. For the intern, this practicum fostered professional empathy, ethical awareness, and critical thinking skills. Findings highlight the importance of integrating formative training with clinical supervision in preparing future psychologists and call for specialized training in crisis intervention and interdisciplinary collaboration in correctional facilities.
References
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Routledge.
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2011). The Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) model: Does adding the Good Lives Model contribute to effective crime prevention? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(7), 735–755.
Beaudry, G., Yu, R., Långström, N., & Fazel, S. (2021). Effectiveness of interventions in prison to reduce recidivism after release: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 8(9), 759–773.
Chasciar, D. R., Radu, D., Bălășoiu, M., & Dumitrescu, A. (2025). Determinante ale reintegrării sociale post-penitenciare în România/Determinants of post-penitentiary social reintegration in Romania. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1484889.
Council of Europe. (2023). European prison rules. Council of Europe Publishing. https://rm.coe.int/09000016809ee581.
Crînguș, C.-M., & Le, T. K. D. (2023). Profil psihologic al deținuților din penitenciarele din România/A psychological profile of prisoners in Romanian correctional facilities. Anthropological Researches and Studies, 13(1), 122–139.
Fazel, S., Wolf, A., Geddes, J. R., & Hayes, A. J. (2025). Bridging assessment and treatment for repeat suicidality in prison. BMJ Mental Health, 28(1), e301280.
Haney, C. (2018). The psychological impact of incarceration: Implications for post-prison adjustment. American Psychologist, 73(3), 388–404.
Kjærvik, S. L., Grøndahl, P., Mykletun, A., & Rypdal, K. (2024). A meta-analytic review of anger management activities in correctional settings. Clinical Psychology Review, 104, 102326.
Klapow, M. C., Jennings, R., Alvarez, P., Li, W., & Thompson, J. (2025). The effectiveness of positive psychology-based interventions in prisons: A meta-analysis. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1–16.
Konrad, N., Daigle, M. S., Daniel, A. E., Dear, G. E., Frottier, P., Hayes, L. M., Kerkhof, A., Liebling, A., & Sarchiapone, M. (2007). Preventing suicide in prisons, part I: Recommendations from the International Association for Suicide Prevention Task Force on Suicide in Prisons. Crisis, 28(3), 113–121.
Lipsey, M. W., Landenberger, N. A., & Wilson, S. J. (2007). Effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for criminal offenders. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 3(6).
Meijers, J., Harte, J. M., Meynen, G., & Cuijpers, P. (2023). Impulsivity interventions for offenders: A meta-review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 70, 101795.
Pedrola-Pons, A., García-Molina, P., Martínez-Sánchez, C., & Ruiz-Pérez, M. (2024). Efficiency of psychological interventions in the prevention of suicidal and self-injurious behaviours in prison: A systematic review. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 89, 101922.
Popa, E. (2019). Rolul programelor psihosociale derulate în penitenciare/The role of psychosocial programs carried out in penitentiaries. New Trends in Psychology, 1(2), 34–48. https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/NTP/article/view/81/363.
Saxena, K., Miller, J., Huang, L., & Becker, R. (2024). Understanding the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy on offenders. Journal of Correctional Psychology, 15(4), 231–245.
Slade, K., Andrews, M., Patel, R., & Wong, T. (2025). Suicide prevention following conviction within the criminal justice system: A combined initiative trial. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 16, 1501647.
Smith, A., Jordan, L., Rahman, S., & Clarke, T. (2024). Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural approaches in criminal justice: An updated systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 20(5), e1425.
Ward, T., & Brown, M. (2021). Moral repair and offender rehabilitation: A strengths-based approach. Psychology, Crime & Law, 27(6), 539–557.
World Health Organization. (2007). Preventing suicide in jails and prisons. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43678.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ecaterina Popa, Brigitte Popa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The author fully assumes the content originality and the holograph signature makes him responsible in case of trial.