The Impact of Fundamental Pedagogical Paradigms on the Development of Action Research
Keywords:
scientific knowledge, research paradigm, pedagogical paradigms, educational research paradigms, action research paradigmAbstract
This study aims to clarify the epistemological status of action research within the context of evolving pedagogical paradigms, to describe the domains through which these paradigms influence its development, and to formulate scientific conclusions regarding the importance of valuing fundamental pedagogical paradigms in educational inquiry. Prior Work: The analysis builds on established definitions of paradigms as systems of fundamental beliefs guiding research, particularly those formulated by Guba and Lincoln (1994), who conceptualize paradigms as interpretive frameworks. It also extends the tridimensional model proposed by Pretorius (2024), which integrates ontological, epistemological, and axiological dimensions into a cohesive understanding of research orientations. Approach: A theoretical and comparative analysis was conducted to synthesize prevailing pedagogical paradigms and examine their influence on the conceptual and methodological structure of action research. Three dominant paradigmatic approaches were identified: the functional, the constructivist, and the transdisciplinary, each shaping how educational problems are framed and addressed. Results: The study provides a theoretical synthesis that elucidates how these paradigmatic orientations inform the structuring of action research. It demonstrates that each approach defines specific strategies for inquiry, interpretation, and knowledge production in pedagogical contexts. Implications: Findings underscore the necessity of aligning action research with clear epistemological, axiological, and methodological foundations. A systematic understanding of research paradigms enhances the coherence and scientific legitimacy of pedagogical inquiry. Value: The study offers a conceptual framework that serves as a gnoseological matrix, capable of guiding all stages of action research from problem definition to dissemination, thus contributing to the advancement of scientific knowledge in education.
References
Allemang, B., Sitter, K., & Dimitropoulos, G. (2021). Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient‐oriented research. Health Expectations, 24(6), 1517–1525.
Bhinder, N. (2023). Challenges of experimental research in education. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 1(1).
Castrillo, C. J. H. (2024). Paradigma positivista. Boletín Científico de las Ciencias Económico Administrativas del ICEA, 12(24), 29–32.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. 6th Ed. Routledge.
Constantino, T. (2008). Constructivism. In Given, L. M. (Ed.). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. 1–2, 116–118. SAGE Publications.
Cristea, S. (2014). Paradigms in education/pedagogy. DIDACTICA PRO Magazine of Educational Theory and Practice, 87(5–6), 93–100.
Cristea, S., Cojocaru-Borozan, M., Sadovei, L., & Papuc, L. (2016). Theory and praxiology of pedagogical research. Didactics and Pedagogy Publishing House.
Croucher, S. M., & Cronn-Mills, D. (2014). Understanding communication research methods: A theoretical and practical approach. Taylor & Francis.
Given, L. M. (Ed.). (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Vols. 1–2. SAGE Publications.
Kelly, L. M., & Cordeiro, M. (2020). Three principles of pragmatism for research on organizational processes. Methodological Innovations, 13(2).
Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26–41.
Maksimović, J., & Evtimov, J. (2023). Positivism and post-positivism as the basis of quantitative research in pedagogy. Research in Pedagogy, 13(1), 208–218.
Omodan, B. I. (2024). Research paradigms and their methodological alignment in social sciences: A practical guide for researchers. Taylor & Francis.
Park, Y. S., Konge, L., & Artino Jr, A. R. (2020). The positivism paradigm of research. Academic Medicine, 95(5), 690–694.
Pretorius, L. (2024). Demystifying research paradigms: Navigating ontology, epistemology, and axiology in research. The Qualitative Report, 29(10), 2698–2715.
Scotland, J. (2012). Exploring the philosophical underpinnings of research: Relating ontology and epistemology to the methodology and methods of the scientific, interpretive, and critical research paradigms. English Language Teaching, 5(9), 9–16.
Ţvircun, V., & Callo, T. (2017). Modern Trends in Pedagogical Research in the Republic of Moldova. Journal of Science, Innovation, Culture and Art Akademos, 44(1), 135–141.
Zaidi, Z., & Larsen, D. (2018). Commentary: Paradigms, axiology, and praxeology in medical education research. Academic Medicine, 93(11S), S1–S7.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Didactica Danubiensis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
