The Methodology of Pedagogical Action Research in Higher Education
Keywords:
qualitative, quantitative, and mixed research methods, research design, PedAR methodological frameworkAbstract
Objectives: This study examines pedagogical action research (PedAR) methodology in higher education contexts, seeking to establish its operational definition while emphasizing both its pedagogical significance and the indispensable role of methodological adaptability in evidence-based educational inquiry. Prior Work: The investigation builds upon established educational research scholarship and PedAR’s epistemological traditions, while engaging with current discussions concerning methodological rigor. It specifically analyzes how structured professional training experiences can be effectively institutionalized within academic practice. Approach: The study conducts a theoretical analysis of how pedagogical action research (PedAR) literature conceptualizes qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method approaches in higher education research. A critical review methodology underpins the development of a unified conceptual framework for PedAR. Results: The research proposes a reconceptualized PedAR model featuring systematic data triangulation, iterative analytical cycles, and hermeneutic interpretation. These components facilitate reflective academic practice and enable context-responsive refinement of pedagogical strategies across institutional environments. Implications: The findings provide actionable approaches for incorporating PedAR into faculty development programs and institutional research policies, empowering academic leaders and educators to foster enduring research-informed cultures. Value: Through its integrative and context-sensitive PedAR model, this study both consolidates the methodology’s foundations and validates its dual utility as a scholarly research approach and pedagogical enhancement tool in higher education.
References
Asamoah, M. K. (2014). Re-examination of the limitations associated with correlational research. Journal of Educational Research and Reviews, 2(4), 45–52.
Ben Kei, D., & Harland, T. (2017). A step-by-step guide to the research process. Taylor & Francis.
Bielska, J. (2011). The experimental method in action research. In D. Gabryś-Barker (Ed.), Action research in teacher development: An overview of research methodology, pp. 85–121. Katowice.
Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.
Bryman, A. (2008). Of methods and methodology. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 3(2), 159–168.
Bushnaq, T., & Borozan, M. (2021). Theoretical suggestions for using qualitative methods in pedagogical research. In Cultura cercetării pedagogice: Provocări şi tendinţe contemporane/The Culture of Pedagogical Research: Contemporary Challenges and Trends, Vol. 2, pp. 78–96. Tiraspol State University Printing House.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (2003). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. Routledge.
Chandra Kumar, S., & Vivek, R. (2023). A critical review of the mixed method application and its criticism. Social Work and Education, 10(2), 242–253.
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques. Wiley.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Crowther, D., & Lancaster, D. (2012). Research methods. Taylor & Francis.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed). Sage Publications.
Dillon, J., & Wals, A. E. J. (2006). On the danger of blurring methods, methodologies and ideologies in environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 12(3–4), 549–558.
Efron, S. E., & Ravid, R. (2019). Action research in education: A practical guide (2nd ed). Guilford Publications.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th Ed). Pearson Education.
Given, L. M. (Ed.). (2008). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Vol. 1–2. Sage Publications.
Graff, J. C. (2014). Mixed methods research. In Evidence-based practice: An integrative approach to research, administration, and practice, pp. 45–64.
Harvey, O., Regmi, P. R., Mahato, P., Adhikari, S. D., Dhital, R., & Van Teijlingen, E. (2023). Methods or methodology: Terms that are too often confused. Journal of Education and Research, 13(2), 94–105.
Ivankova, N. (2015). Mixed methods applications in action research: From methods to community action. Sage Publications.
James, A., Hedges, L. V., Waring, M., & Coe, R. (2012). Research methods and methodologies in education. Sage Publications.
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2016). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage Publications.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed, pp. 559–603. Sage.
Lapan, S. D., Quartaroli, M. T., & Riemer, F. J. (2012). Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and design (1st ed). John Wiley & Sons.
Lau, F. (2017). Methods for correlational studies. In Handbook of eHealth evaluation: An evidence-based approach. University of Victoria. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK481614/.
Leavy, P. (2014). The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
LeJeune, M. (2010). Teacher work sample methodology as a frame for action research. In P. Pelton (Ed.), Action research for teacher candidates, pp. 135–155. Rowman & Littlefield Education.
Llego, M. A. (n.d.). Action research: Designing causal-comparative studies for assessing educational situations in the Philippine context. https://www.teacherph.com.
Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2010). Methods in educational research: From theory to practice. John Wiley & Sons.
Loeb, S., Dynarski, S., McFarland, D., Morris, P., Reardon, S., & Reber, S. (2017). Descriptive analysis in education: A guide for researchers. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage Publications.
Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 23–48.
Nagpal, D., Kornerup, I., & Gibson, M. P. (2021). Mixed-method research: A basic understanding. CODS-Journal of Dentistry, 12(1), 11–16.
Norton, L. S. (2018). What does doing pedagogical action research mean in the current higher education context? In Action research in teaching and learning, pp. 1–15. Routledge.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48–63.
Rahman, M. S. (2016). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “testing and assessment” research: A literature review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102–112.
Risku, H., Hirvonen, M., Rogl, R., & Milošević, J. (2022). Ethnographic research. In The Routledge handbook of translation and methodology, pp. 324–339. Routledge.
Singh, A. (2021). An introduction to experimental and exploratory research. SSRN.
Styhre, A., & Sundgren, M. (2005). Action research as experimentation. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 18, 53–65.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage.
Unimrkt. (2023). An expert’s guide to successful quantitative descriptive research. https://www.unimrkt.com.
Vincett, J. (2024). What is action ethnography? Reconsidering our intentions for impact in ethnographic practice. Journal of Organizational Ethnography.
Vu, T. T. N. (2021). Understanding validity and reliability from qualitative and quantitative research traditions. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 37(3).
Waring, M. (2021). Finding your theoretical position. In Research methods and methodologies in education. Sage Publications.
Wertz, F. J., Charmaz, K., McMullen, L., Josselson, R., Anderson, R., & McSpadden, E. (2011). Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry. Guilford Press.
Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Didactica Danubiensis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
